• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is. It’s not the preferred term for that stuff anymore. But anyone who’s been seeing that used as the abbreviation for all those years before they came up with CSAM is going to recognize it as that.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is nothing about consent in the definition of the term “pornography”. “CP” doesn’t imply thinking it is okay, and “CSAM” is for virtue-signaling losers who probably also correct “homeless” to “unhoused” because they think that’s the same thing as helping.

        • zikzak025@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I always just assumed CSAM was people trying to exclude illustrated kiddie porn from the definition since no sexual assault takes place.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the main issue is that CP kind of normalizes it and associates it with regular porn while CSAM makes it clear how bad it is.

          I do mostly agree that it doesn’t really matter much which is used and unhoused does annoy me a bit. It’s bothersome being corrected I guess but it’s nothing to get mad about either tbh.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Literally noone in the history of the world thinks that you can normalise child porn by calling it child porn. But some people, faced with the difficulty of making a real difference, seize in the only thing they feel they can control: other people’s language.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              The ones advocating for it are child protection agencies, not randos on the internet with no control.

              I found it annoying as well at first but it’s easy to get used too. I don’t see the harm in it.

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Because firstly, while they can talk how they like as long as it makes sense, they want to demonstrate how pure and holy they are by berating everyone not offering their edicts. And secondly because the literal meaning doesn’t cover everything they want to apply it to. Drawn child porn is not “child sexual assault material” but they still want to use the same term, because for them purity tests are more important than making sense.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Nobody is labeling lolicon stuff as csam.

                  I think you are looking too deep into it. All I know is that experts who have made it their life’s work catching predators want us to use CSAM and think it might have an effect, I’m not going to give people grief over using it.

                  • FishFace@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Nobody is labeling lolicon stuff as csam.

                    I see it most times this comes up.

                    I’m not going to give people grief over using it.

                    Sure. But I’m not going to take grief for not using it, nor omit an eye-rolling comment when someone else gets grief.

        • fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Boy I sure hope any porn I see was consensual, else it isn’t porn but an illegal rape video wtf.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I mean, yes that’s what it would be if it’s not consensual? Major self-report here, bud.

            • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Do you ever wonder if the porn actor filming with a smile, might secretly be a hostage, and you might be getting off to someone being raped?

              Well, I at least I don’t have to worry about that anymore.