Seems pretty clear Claude is winning this AI race


Anthropic’s valuation now hovers at around $1 trillion on Forge Global, a leading private marketplace exchange, its CEO Kelly Rodriques told Business Insider. OpenAI’s valuation on the platform is $880 billion, a slight uptick from its March funding round.

Since Anthropic and OpenAI are not yet public companies, the vast majority of investors are forced to buy via secondary markets, with existing stock in the companies sold by current or former employees or early investors. Neither company responded to a request for comment.

One Anthropic shareholder recently offered to unload shares at a $1.15 trillion valuation, according to Ken Sawyer, cofounder and managing partner at Saints Capital, a venture secondary firm.

A “very well known growth fund” offered to buy Anthropic shares at a $1.05 trillion valuation, Jesse Leimgruber, founder of OpenHome, posted on X this week.

“Absolutely wild,” he said.

Some interested buyers have gotten more creative, offering to sell their home in exchange for Anthropic shares at a valuation above $800 billion.

  • LazyCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    These AI companies are playing a huge game of musical chairs. When the music stops, most of them are going to left standing around with their dicks in their hand and wondering where all the money went. It’d be funny if it didn’t also mean the economy crashing for the rest of us.

    • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      what do you mean? at the moment Anthropic is profitable and desperate for more compute, they are crashing all the time from too much demand and have had to take away so many features from their plans due to crashing their servers from heavy demand:

      After speculation and frustration spread, Anthropic’s head of growth, Amol Avasare, took to social media to clarify that this was a “small test on ~2% of new prosumer signups.” As for the reasoning, he explained:

      When we launched Max a year ago, it didn’t include Claude Code, Cowork didn’t exist, and agents that run for hours weren’t a thing. Max was designed for heavy chat usage, that’s it.

      Since then, we bundled Claude Code into Max and it took off after Opus 4. Cowork landed.

      Long-running async agents are now everyday workflows. The way people actually use a Claude subscription has changed fundamentally. Engagement per subscriber is way up.

      We’ve made small adjustments along the way (weekly caps, tighter limits at peak), but usage has changed a lot and our current plans weren’t built for this.

      So we’re looking at different options to keep delivering a great experience for users.

      • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They are not making money on any monthly plan users except people paying for enterprise per token. The entire thing is built on the hope that businesses will continually spend huge amounts of money on it forever.

        • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          At the moment they have no reason to doubt that

          Mistral’s revenues soar over $400mn as Europe seeks AI independence

          https://www.ft.com/content/664249e7-e8d5-4425-b397-ad3ed590b305?syn-25a6b1a6=1

          And Mistral appears to be 6 months to a year behind Claude which in the AI race is a fucking eternity

          Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate has reached $14 billion, according to the company’s own announcement. The company says this figure has grown more than 10x annually for the past three years. That kind of growth from a company earning the bulk of its revenue from business customers, not consumer subscriptions, is unusual.

          The enterprise numbers tell a more specific story. Over 500 customers now spend at least $1 million per year on Claude, up from a dozen just two years ago. Customers spending more than $100,000 annually have grown sevenfold in the past 12 months. And eight of the Fortune 10 are now Claude customers. Axios noted that 1 in 5 businesses using Ramp now pay for Anthropic, up from 1 in 25 a year ago, and about 79% of OpenAI’s paying users also pay for Anthropic, suggesting the market isn’t zero-sum.

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmarkman/2026/02/13/anthropic-the-380-billion-powerhouse-hiding-in-plain-sight/

          The numbers are staggering

          At my workplace which is extremely tepid and slow moving, they initially rolled out Microsoft Copilot much to the hate of everyone who knows about AI

          The developers have been demanding Claude and they’re doing a very slow roll out of it which is amazing in itself, who would have thought they could roll out anything that isn’t Microsuck Dogshit Premium Pro 365

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    OpenAI is failing to monetize their model, is falling behind on Claude on benchmarks, can’t compete with Google on pricing/costs, is struggling to retain talent, and people don’t trust Sam Altman.

    Unless something major changes, it really seems like we’ve passed the peak of OpenAI’s trajectory and it’ll be mostly downhill from here.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Huh? They are the best quality delivered by any Commercial AI company. Are you confusing compainies who provide AI as their service with what the actual AI bubble is? The AI bubble is built off companies making promises of what they can provide using AI. They are the ones who cannot deliver. Anthropic is the best performing AI service on the market. They wont cause the AI bubble or its eventual burst. They aren’t valued by what their consumers arent able to provide. Anthropics valuation is based off its own intrinsic factors which is affected by the state of the bubble and again not the cause or blame.

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        What is Anthropic’s product useful for, if all of their downstream users are incapable of delivering a product using it?

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Some interested buyers have gotten more creative, offering to sell their home in exchange for Anthropic shares at a valuation above $800 billion.

    No way this could possibly go badly.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I love using Claude and not paying any money for it. I know I’m the product, but it just confirms that we’re in a massive bubble and these valuations are ridiculous. Not real money. “Trillion-dollar” is meaningless if it never touches the real economy.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Someone needs to develop a browser extension or something that replaces the microphones in pictures of AI CEO’s with bongs so they are more truthful representations of what the CEO is saying

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just look at the shoe company that decided to rebrand as an AI company and tripled their valuation.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s the dot com bubble all over again. Going to end the same way that one did as well, most of these companies are going to go bankrupt, a few will just eat the massive loss, and an even tinier handful will actually come out ahead. I’m betting the event that’s going to finally pop the bubble is when OpenAI is forced to file for bankruptcy in another year or so despite its ridiculous stock valuation.