- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
How many R’s are in strawberry?
No… you haven’t.
AI is Wack
I’ll believe him when he tears off his skin suit.
This guy has completely lost the plot. I don’t think it’s possible to be even more disconnected from reality.
>You think you’ve achieved AGI
>I know you haven’tWe are not the same
if agi then why still jobs?
Fun fact: if true AGI were a thing, those AI programs would be people and not paying them for their work would be slavery.
If I was a NVDA investor, I’d be worried. This clown is doing nothing but gaslighting and lying these days.
But you’re wrong, you’re all wrong!
“my chatbot told me so!”
Started lying at the second word, then.
These fuckers will claim whatever nonsense to keep themselves relevant enough to take on more debt before they collapse.
Looking at their history they were always able to create markets for their GPUs and AI has been obviously incredible for them. There will be the next hot thing after AI and they’ll try to have that, too. The alternatives to CUDA are not there yet, ROCm is still lacking and fiddly. I see a lot of things happening but NVIDIA collapsing for whatever reason is not part of that.
I agree, they start to sound desperate to keep their current momentum going. I think the bubble will burst soon. Things look solid until they’re not.
The Turing thing again, how good a system is at mimicking a human? Like, lot’s of dog owners could swear; the dog is smarter than a cat. But dogs are only better at reading their human.
I’ll believe him, if he let’s the LLM do his job.
Cats may be able to read their human just as well or better, but as they don’t give a shit, there’s no feedback to base anything on.
His can we take this idiot seriously; slop DLSS, tgen telling us we are wrong about this (the buddy telling me what I prefer), then we achieved AGI…
How low can he falls?
Oh yes we have achieved AGI! But what we really need is Artificial General Super Intelligence! Just another trillion and it will be useful bro!
LLMs aren’t AI, let alone AGI.
They’re fucking prediction engines with extra functions.
The best description I’ve ever heard of LLMs is “a blurry jpeg of the internet”. From the perspective of data compression and retrieval, they’re impressive… but they’re still a blurry jpeg. The image doesn’t change, you can only zoom in on different parts of it and apply extra filters, and there’s nothing you can truly do about the compression artifacts (what we call “hallucinations”). It can’t think, it can’t learn, it just is, and that’s all it will ever be.
So are we. Your definition of AI also seems off. It’s a field of computer science dealing with seemingly cognitive algorithms. Basically everything that is not rule based programming. I work in AI production since over ten years. It is absolutely valid and necessary to hate AI, but not to deny technical functionality. Also the other answer to your comment: of course training a neural network is a form of learning. Wether it is by reinforcement or by training data. There are many applications of ML since many years before LLMs, it makes no sense to deny that it exists.
What’s your psychology background?
I get that you’re trolling but I don’t understand where you’re coming from. Why psychology?
It’s an industrial sized prediction engine. And when you apply that to bioscience, it predicts things that saves lives.
