• RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Would the planet be better off if everyone ran their own models locally and bypassed data centers? Seems like it would, but there may be other factors.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s probably the case that a data center is better at running an AI than a home PC, they’re crazily optimised. I also doubt it would be more cost effective, unless you were using the hardware all day.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yes and no, it’s hard to say.

      Individual things will always be less efficient than mass produced things.

      Food

      Factory produced items.

      Electric vs Gasoline cars.

      Local vs central models.

      But also, people might use it less frivolously if they are footing the bill directly. Plus, you will still need a data center somewhere in the chain to train the models, you cannot train models on local hardware. Not with any level of meaningful usefulness (AI hate it’s never useful blah blah aside).

      The main advantages of local AI are two things. First Privacy, which is huge. No stealing your prompts of tracking what you ask about for ads or potential abuse by fascist assholes etc. Second, it’s not edited or censored (with the right model). You can ask it whatever you want from Tianamen Square to making bombs, to naked pictures of your favorite celebrity etc. If this is good or not is debatable, but it’s one of the two main reasons local is better.

  • AmyAye@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I will never, pay for Open AI.

    I might, in some future, pay for Claude, but not OpenAI.

    But also very much probably not on Claude either.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      claude is just as bad, they are trying to get AI regulated so they will be the only ones charging people for thier services, they know the bubble is about to bust.

      • AmyAye@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think Claude is actually useful for things I need it to do sometimes while Open AI is very much not (coding). Open AI is often wrong in simple ways it should not be. Claude is really great at iterative building.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    In his defense, open weight models really fucked with his entire business model. Do you know how much more profitable Open AI and Anthropic would be if Meta had never released llama and then Chinese companies hadn’t fine-tuned llama and released their own models? What he’s saying makes no sense at all, but… it’s understandable for him to be biased on this… Because but for Meta, of all companies, there wouldn’t be open weighted models.

    It’s also something to remember whenever being annoyed with Meta.

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Literally the mentality of the English land-owning gentry enclosing the ancient commons and driving people off the land into dependency on them. It was bullshit then, and it’s bullshit now.

      It’s straight up kleptoparasite mentality.

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s been the central mentality of the owning class since the ability to individually own the means of production was conceived.

        • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          They won’t care about rent-seeking without their brains. There’s a simple solution to these problems, we just have to do it. It’s easy and fun, so I hear. I’m willing to be the first, I’ll accept those dirty hands

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It is the cyberfeudal lord’s wet dream. Can we skip the dark ages and go straight to the French Revolution?

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Uhh that’s exactly what they want. The French revolution was just more rich assholes taking control. In this case it was the merchant class. The Techbro class definitely wants to take control. Also, the majority of people beheaded in the French revolution were commoners.

    • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t know, they all pretty much suck at this point. Is there any single one out there that is actually advocating to help humanity?

  • redbrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This dude and Jared Kushner…they’ve got this face that just makes me want to punch the screen! I wonder why…

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Beware this guy.

    He wants to rule the world for serious.

    He’s probably moving more money than anybody else. He’s absolutely burning more money than anybody else.

    If nobody stops him, then it’s going to be bad times that we cannot imagine yet.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah trust the opinions of someone who can’t even use their true voice. … Elizabeth Holmes wanna be

  • VeryVito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Why not just skip the ram altogether and go ahead and just send all the money to one person, too? Having it all in one account seems way more practical than spreading cash out all over the country.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Technically we’re almost there. There are like a few dozen parasitic assholes who have all the money, and if you graph the average person’s wealth alongside theirs, it rounds to 0. You’d need a really tall chart for that first pixel-height bar to render at all.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    “But from a global allocation perspective, actually, it’s quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of [dynamic RAM] food sitting in their own computer pantry,” he added.

    Sounds a bit evil, like the kinda thing a cartoon villain would say. Doesn’t matter if it’s food or RAM, he wants what is yours. His continued existence is a personal and direct threat against you, your family, and their safety.

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      We should give him what ge wants, and help him shed his corporeal shell and go into the computer