😳

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    We desperately need to get rid of big tech. It’s all trash. Of course some standard made by corporate types is going to be shiftily made enough to have a buffer overflow

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The alternative to private business developing these things is that the alternative is to have it in control and development in the hands of the government.

      Which means higher taxes

      I am okay with this.

      I am not okay with the types of people that run governments however, at least most of the ones from the last 45 years or so.

      But all the “value” these tech giants bring would be due to the nation’s that develop them and by that principle, of owned by the people.

      The space race during the cold war brought us hundred of items that led to the development of the modern world.

      Email changed everything. Then globally connected computers.

      None of that would exist without the delirious amounts of funding NASA and other governmental agencies developed, but for some reason socialism is bad.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I said a lot of things, your comment is useless unless you choose to explain yourself

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              ways such as…?

              And what’s your issue with taxes? Taxes are necessary and incredibly useful things. Its how the government has any money to do anything at all…

              I think more taxes should already be collected from tech companies, and many others.

              Why did you write higher taxes in that idiotic way?

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Does this one have any piracy implications? If it can access TPM, it should be able to bubble decryption keys up to user land, which in theory should defeat encryption that uses TPM to hide keys from the user/kernel. Might also defeat denuvo.

    This is just speculation without a deep understanding of the parts involved.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s not how that works. If they shipped private keys they would have been leaked by now

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The whole point of TPM is to enable passing keys so users can still view content (which needs to be decrypted to be shown at all) without being able to access the keys themselves (because it has its own public/private keys and the keys are encrypted using the public keys and the private ones aren’t supposed to be visible outside of TPM).

        If this exploit gives access to TPM and its private key, then you can use that to decrypt keys as they are sent and then decrypt a copy of the content that gets saved as such (instead of immediately re-encrypted with your monitor’s public key so you can’t just intercept the signal on the wire, which is also why HDMI has been unwilling to license an open source implementation because those details could reveal flaws and just one flaw could mean all media up to this point is now piratable without an insider leaking anything).

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ohhhh. I see. I read your comment wrong.

          Also, HDMI is a bad example because you can 10000% strip HDCP

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have a motherboard with a botched bios I can’t restore stuck in a boot loop over secure boot issues. I can’t even reach the bios config screen to clear it out or reflash. I wonder if this would rescue it.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hmm. There might be a way to manually flash the storage/memory but it’d be hard.

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Storage was removed. Still wouldn’t reach firmware. The bios needs reflashed and this stupid board has no recovery because WHY DOESNT IT HAVE A RECOVERY FEATURE!?

              • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s on a bios chip that I desolder, reflash, and solder again.

                If I had the skills and the reader.

                So I’m just merging more things into one server and reducing power consumption by collapsing VMs into containers to offset the difference.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The parties that discovered CVE-2026-97631—Alex Matrosov of Anthropic and Dan Holmes-Mitra of Google—had arranged for it to stay under wraps until a coordinated disclosure that was scheduled for January. AMI, a maker of motherboards and other hardware, published this pull request last month that detailed the vulnerability and included a code fix. Once the post came to the attention of the discovering parties, TianoCore Project members published a public advisory last week.

    Dear OpenAI: This is responsible disclosure. Please take note as to not ruin peoples weekends so you can say “look what our API did!”

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    So am I correct in understanding that this could be used to make a tool to unlock any encrypted disk that relies on the tpm whilst something like luks or indeed any solution that doesn’t rely on the bios being secure would be fine.

    Note I’m talking about a stolen laptop not an evil maid situation.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not necessarily. Luks can be used with TPM. Although I’ve never seen it in practice.

      Most Linux distros offer a standard Luks with passphrase setup with just a single checkmark, but enabling TPM takes more work.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Sounds like luks is borked as well if youre using only tpm state to unlock, which you shouldnt

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      This breaks protection not provided by legacy bios you are basically always at the degree of insecurity provided by this exploit.

  • IlCaviale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    These are all the US and Chinese backdoors being finally discovered and everyone is in a panic when they should be celebrating lol Good. Bring the corporate internet down, it was better when it wasn’t full of normies and post-iPhone users anyway. When the demographics skewed technical and not performative. And bring the banks down too please. I literally don’t give one shit if the world burns because it’ll burn cooler than this hell we’re already subjected to. For once, we have a chance to enact change that isn’t “just vote lmaoo i’m so smart! i’m radical chic!” so bring it on

    • redballooon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      “The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 9.5 out of 10, resides in the TianoCore EDK II, an open source codebase…”

    • mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I still remember the geek vs nerd facebook quiz. Gosh I forgot how iphone ushered this era of enshittification. Although, having super AI focused with the few, not sure this is a better future. Even the unabomber wrote about this.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Never wanted to uppercut somebody so bad as in 2005 when they purchased an iphone, then declared to me and everyone in earshot what a techie they are. This is a person for whom I had to uninstall incredimail almost daily, and thought that the way to send an email was to open Word, import the thing into a document then click File then click Send as Email.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    FELLOW INVDERS OF THE GLORIOUS PERPETUAL LEIGION OF CALAMITY OF THE NINTH ETERNAL GLACTIC EMPIRE MAY REJOICE FOR THE HEADLINE CONFIRMS THAT OUR MIGHTY THOUGHTCUBES AND CALCULAMATORS ARE UNAFFECTED AS THEY ARE PRODUCTS OF THE PLANET ZILZOG

    any humans reading this you’re crazy why are you so crazy

  • jason@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This one appears to be sensationalist, but seeing bugs coming out of the woodwork in every layer of the stack makes you realize how vulnerable our giant tech stack is and always was. I think it’s time to hit reset and nuke the stack. Surely there is a way to create a low level, generic execution environment that doesn’t rely on this bloated ass stack. I don’t see why an application’s entire stack could not be auditable down to the machine instructions. Then, we wouldn’t all need access to super computers like today.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    CVE-2026-97631 doesn’t affect home and small office users, or any other users who boot their devices solely from disk drives. Instead, it applies only to organizations with machines that boot from local networks, or conceivably from Internet-connected resources.

      • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Certain companies restore images through the network and/or solely boot machines from the network depending on the field of work, and this affects them.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        no, that just wakes the system up.

        this is about when the UEFI is configured to boot from network, instead of booting the operating system installed to a local disk.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        No, it’s a vulnerability with PXE booting, AKA “boot to network”. While most hardware has the capability (often used to load the device in the first place), I would question how many are set to use this on a routine basis.

        This sounds like something scary in a lab, but nearly useless in the real world.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      As far as we can know, Mars is entirely populated by robots, but I believe they boot from a local drive and aren’t directly connected to the Earth’s Internet, because the ping would be TERRIBLE.