Executives are twice as likely as rank-and-file workers to trust AI over their own judgment, per a survey out Wednesday morning.

It’s a worrying development. Leaders are hired for their experience and knowledge.

Outsourcing that to AI raises the risk of making decisions that don’t line up with reality, which then reverberate across companies and beyond.

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    leaders are hired for their experience and knowledge

    Not because they’re Machiavellian wall-climbers?

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      In capitalism we distribute them to the shareholders. Or the AI’s shareholders. Often the same.

    • bold_omi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It is already doing their jobs. They need to be replaced with people selected from productive non-managerial roles at the workplace and replaced often.

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    You really can get far in management with charisma, ass-kissing, boundless optimism and ability to take credit on everything. None are really markers for smart or technically minded person, or even a moral one.

  • pootzapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Guys this is it, the window we’ve been waiting for! All we need to do is inject pro union pro consumer tax paying sentiment into ai and we’re golden!! Like when they hijacked Rick santonrum’s name in google search…we did it!

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Well that about wraps it up for anyone who still believed in the usefulness of executives.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Ai would certainly be cheaper, and much less emotionally unstable even given how completely fucked it is.

  • spacegoat@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Because in their heart of hearts they know that they are skillless and worthless

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    This means they should never use AI because they are uniquely vulnerable to AI disinformation and likely AI pyschosis.

    We need a new generation of CEO that can actually think for themselves, as bizarre as that sounds.

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          we just need a critical mass % of people willing to break the current system down, the rest can be dragged along, kicking and screaming all the way

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Whatever works at this point, but I think the best way to move forward is to convince the major stakeholders to change by presenting a new paradigm. Something they may not necessarily love, but are willing to accept.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I mean, have you seen the decisions they were making without it? Probably 50:50 on C-staff

    closer to the work, you have to trust the workers decisions quite a bit more.