No fucking way this was decided by an engineer instead of a manager

Customers shouldn’t need to be concerned because the company going down should not brick your PHYSICAL PRODUCTS

And yet, here we are

You are fascinating.

Here we see the average internet debatebro. They do not possess the necessary skills to participate in a discussion, so they instead attempt to use derogatory language to place themselves above their perceived opponents, where they are free to continue their delusions of grandeur.

Boomerism is not a mental illness they just don’t understand computers

Most people are capable of doing quite a lot on their own, even in subjects they are not “100 percent versed in”

And in turn people are allowed to suggest solutions for your complaints

Such as?

Bad meme usage

I mean props for escaping but you’re still giving advice you would clearly not follow

I do not understand how “vote for the better option” could possibly not be the correct move. If you want to change the candidates we have in the general election, no strategy for voting within the general election will change that; you would need to vote in the primaries to get the legitimately good candidates into the general. This is once again voting for the best option. If you have another theory I would love to hear how you expect it to work.

If I were in charge I’d ban every last Trump voter from ever voting again. It’s only immoral if you’re incorrect ™.

Ok go ahead

Ooh that’s a good one

Nobody else needs to see for it to look good to you :)

Bruh

Because it will show you the error with your argument: Your approach to pronouncing acronyms is likely not consistent with the method you’re describing here.

I dare you to try this with every other acronym

If the debt grows faster than your investment I don’t see how squirreling away some money is smart. The amount your investment “builds up” will be less than the amount it will have saved you if you paid off your debt.

You cannot meaningfully invest without at least a few hundred spare dollars. Expecting a multi-hundred-percent increase is not realistic.