Offsides is the most bullshit rule ever invented. “You’re behind all our defenders!!!” Yeah no shit that’s because I’m trying to SCORE
Offsides is the most bullshit rule ever invented. “You’re behind all our defenders!!!” Yeah no shit that’s because I’m trying to SCORE


“This is to help ensure the users are aware of and prepared to deal with typos.”
“Ok, replacing all characters…”
There should be a “no unedited images” rule
This is ragebait lmao
The water consumption thing is such a meme. Power consumption? Yup. Waste heat? We got that. Pollution? I don’t know but I can take a guess!
Water? Eh. Barely.


Check out dearrow: https://dearrow.ajay.app/
I would unironically rather have someone in office who honestly and openly wants to kill people oj an individual level than someone who pretends they don’t while implementing policies that slaughter millions


If these restrictions are significant, please seek therapy


Exactly what I was thinking. Those NASA guys must be pretty smart


Probably it’s supposed to demonstrate that it’s a liquid


Nothing can beat real organic stupidity


I don’t think this is true. People are out here having straight up AI psychosis. Do you really think there aren’t fools who believe their computer is actually thinking like a human?


What are the odds this was AI related vs some underpaid intern


Ideally people who say that aren’t misled into believing their computer is thinking in the same way that a human is


I agree it’s unnecessary to point out. Using anthropomorphising shorthand to talk about technology is extremely common, and AI is no different; saying an AI is “thinking” or whatever is fine. But there is a difference between using that language as shorthand, and actually holding misconceptions about what is really happening. So saying that it’s fine for someone to be misled and use that language is different than just saying the language makes sense to use.


Having an inaccurate view about something so fundamental to the topic leads you to predict reality incorrectly and make bad decisions


lmfao based


I wouldn’t call this an “experiment” exactly, there wasn’t a proper hypothesis. They also mentioned they hoped to find out what LLMs think about when they’re not being prompted, which shows such a fundamental lack of knowledge that it frankly disqualifies any of their opinions on the subject.
Yet*