

It is more useful to explain why something is wrong


It is more useful to explain why something is wrong


Approaching 2 years!
wtf is that card on the left


Yup. I’m watching my artform die in real time. Not only will my career no longer exist in the form I enjoy it, but the art form itself will die. Nobody is going to appreciate artisan code like they do other forms of art.


You’re misunderstanding the halting problem.


Well I didn’t expect that today
I’m not OP. You’re still doing it btw


You’re dodging the question


Yup. I used Gemini like a year before it took off back when Google first sent out testing invites, because I wanted to see what it could do. That’s very different from active use, but this survey would count me as a regular user.
Although since Google shows me an AI summary whenever I search now, maybe I count as an active one anyways… along with everyone else who uses Google.


Not op but I do with the google AI summary if I’m not able to reasonably verify its truthfulness against my own knowledge.


They’re making an exception to put it into index funds more quickly than is ordinarily allowed, so a lot of normal people might end up holding it too…
If you don’t have an issue with something being both a poison and a tool then how does your original response make sense?


deleted by creator
They certainly know how they taste
Yes. My point is that it being a tool does not prevent it from being a poison. Your argument is flawed.
Womp womp
Poison is also a tool though
Commenting is just failed writers posting comments written by failed writers. I write comments and judge writers of failed comments by writers. Comments.