MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown

Counterpoint

Don’t get me wrong. I love me a nuanced conversation about the intersections of sustainability and accessibility. If you want to, we can have that.

But this is a shitpost community. Posts here aren’t really expected to conform to reality, let alone provide exhaustive coverage of all cases. This stupid shitpost also neglects to consider folks who need to have fluids introduced intravenously and the plastic waste created by single use saline bags, or the material/lifetime of the cup in which a straw is used. This is a dumb meme about the choices that some people make with the options that they have. It is not an indictment against the people to which those options may not be available.

Agreed, and also makes it readily known that that is what you are doing.

The sneakier more user friendly way to implement it would be to require the second correct attempt only if the user has made an incorrect attempt since the last successful login.

It rejects the first [correct] login attempt (it’s worded poorly). It assumes that a brute force attacker will try any given password once and move on, while a human user will think they made a typo and try again. This works until the attacker realizes that it takes two attempts, in which case it merely doubles the attempts required to breach the account, and simply requiring an additional password character would be vastly more effective.

Check my spelling again.

Here’s a helpful mnemonic: “Jet Li got eczema from radiation poisoning”

Li - as in Jet Li
nu - as in nuculer radiation
x - as in eczema

Li-nu-x

edit: spacing

And the front of it.

Do you not?

I didn’t know it existed.

Where were you when you heard that the president was shot?

Where were you when you heard that the towers fell?

Where were you when you heard someone shout “Geht en mah bel-ley!” for the first time?

These are the questions that shaped generations.

admin1234!

BilboBaggins.png

Hol’Up!

You don’t have to be autistic to have a sensory preference, but autism is known to be associated with sensory sensitivity

Well, now that I’ve reviewed up the definition of detritus, not a whole lot.
😂 I would say that detritus is coarser and implies the sense being recognizeable as having been part of a larger whole.
I meant it in the sense of organic debris: leaf litter and such. I think of dirt as being finer and relatively uniform. Water + dirt = mud. Water + detritus = clean detritus.

What I meant was that worms sustain themselves on organic material, and, after they break it down, it is more incorporated in to the soil.

Theres is a whole other discussion to be had whether dirt ≈ soil…

Worms don’t eat dirt. They eat detritus and poop dirt.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/articles/coldplay-concert-kiss-cam-incident-055934019.html

Oh! The humidity!