So you mean to tell me they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture but chose not to because they knew people would pay for the shiny new toys.

There’s a chip crisis and SUDDENLY!!! We’re all able to use new technologies on old computer architectures…

Call it supply and demand but I think that’s fucked up nm which way you look at it.

I read that and then immediately thought to myself, so they just chose not to release upgrades for old architectures and speed released a shit load of new hardware they knew people would pay OTA for.

This whole time they could’ve actually been making old computers better than they are and make it so the consumer didn’t have to spend a fuck load on upgrades but waited till a chip shortage to do it…

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      If they make a mobo that’ll take at least 64gb of DDR3, and an architecture that’ll use it, I’m interested.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Plenty of old hardware still around for that. Might need to look at server boards if consumer boards didn’t support that much.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I did some digging and couldn’t find anything.

        If I’m recreating the youtube video in my mind, I think they’d gone shopping on the streets of Singapore… I did find articles saying China was building DDR3 boards, so maybe you could take a flight out there for the difference in RAM prices and come out even.

        • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Found a few on Aliexpress. Four ram slots, but up to 128GB for some. (unless the seller lied)

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        If someone made a board with like 8 slots for ddr3 and a socket for a decent cpu, it would sell like hotcakes. Basically free ram.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          They do, they’re called servers. Ddr3 era servers are basically worthless. We have some old ddr3 servers at work that I can’t even give away short of dealing with the “free” section of Marketplace or CL. I ain’t dealing with that again.

          • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I’ll take a few off your hands! The 20 year old HP Z600 I use as a server now could use a break 😭

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      For…40 years? Demand for older consumer CPUs has dropped to zero over a few years because the new ones are demonstrably more capable and basically the same price. That’s the whole idea behind Moore’s Law. There are niche applications where that hasn’t been true that were mostly filled by recycled hardware or single board computers. But in general people want the more capable device.

      There’s a whole conversation to be had about software bloat that that chain enabled but planned obsolescence it ain’t.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think they’re talking about planned obsolescence for the mobo / socket not the CPU. Yeah most people want the latest CPU but they don’t necessarily want a mobo upgrade too, but Intel will release a new socket so that you have to get the new mobo.

        If they just released an updated CPU on an old socket plenty of people would buy that but Intel chose not too to juice mobo sales.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Tube a tiny bit fair, many mobo upgrades were made because the new chips consumed much more power and new lines had to be added. That’s obviously not true for some time but up to 2000+ it was part of it all, together with dram upgrades.

          Today if feels like we’ve hit an “enough” level, even my phone could probably be my daily driver, cpu power/ram wise, or close to it.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think a really good ‘for instance’ of what we are talking about is the Pentium Overdrive released in the early-mid 90s. It was a Pentium class processor designed to fit the 486 (previous generation, also where the Pent part of Pentium came from) socket. They have never not been able to backport new instruction sets they just don’t and now we have even more evidence of that.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Since I was a wee lad, when the internet was just an idea, to this day, it’s the first time that “innovation” doesn’t go “higher, further, faster!” But the opposite…

    • BlueWhiteGreenDougFir@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t know about you, but I’ve gotten sadly accustomed to tech “innovation” being more about novel ways of squeezing money out of people way more often than “higher, further, faster” or anything that makes our lives easier, more interesting, or more enjoyable.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Hence i said “innovation”… It was rarely really an innovation. And the more recent, the more your description fits.

        Sadly so, I might add.

  • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture

    I’ve heard that it’s also possible to make consumer motherboards with ECC RAM and no built-in wifi as well, but surely someone would’ve tried that by now if is was technologically possible.

    Maybe the RISC-V RVA23 push will be able to figure it out.

      • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I wasn’t aware of any for consumer level chips. All I really want is a basic motherboard+processor with ECC RAM and solid electronics with good capacitors and power filters like the manufacturers seem to be doing for the high end gaming rigs, but without a lot of bells and whistles that need to be turned off as part of the “new computer” process.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          The CPU support itself is lacking. Board support for sockets which cover both consumer and commercial chipsets is common from SuperMicro.

  • toddestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    These are only “new” chips in a marketing sense.

    From a tech standpoint, they’re more or less the same chips that Intel was making for LGA1700 3-4 years ago refreshed with a new name and model number. They may have slight tweaks to the clocks and the core configs, but other than that there’s really nothing new about them. It’s the same silicon that Intel launched back in 2022.

    The only reason Intel is doing this is because LGA1700 supports DDR4 and that’s kept the demand for it alive with how expensive DDR5 is now.

    • DraconicSun@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Some of those chips have new configurations and power demands. There’s now a 8+12 that is 65w, and the substitute for the 14600K is a 8+8.

      I currently have a 13700K, but if one of those new CPUs have a 8+12 version that’s better than the 14700K and doesn’t turn into a literal furnace I’ll be interested in getting one.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The change in tdp doesn’t really change how the chip fundamentally acts. If you want a non furnace CPU then underclock it and power limit it. Maybe these new CPUs are 0.1% more power efficient as the manufacturing process has improved. But other than the core counts you can do the exact same thing with the existing chips.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I mean AMD has been able to reuse sockets for multiple generations of actual new cpus. Intel has just never done it that way.

  • ZeroPoke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Memory controllers used to be on the motherboards. So your motherboard would determine the type of RAM you used.

    As you may know the something called the chipset these days they used to be called south bridges and we had a north bridge. And the North bridge had things like Memory Controller and other IO stuff. South Bridge hasn’t changed much in terms of what it does. More IO.

    It’s basically like cache tiers. The closer you are to the CPU the faster you can be.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Got my hopes up I thought my haswell server was about to get an upgrade. I love that little 4690k.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    AI is causing human regression. That’s what this is.

    Is one thing to poison the minds of idiots, but this is technological regression.

    Things are getting bad.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      i would say it’s causing a capitalism growth spurt which is “too fast” for the owning class to really keep up, especially with more and more working class realizing capitalism is the problem, not ai, chips, socket types…

      i am hoping this growth will be what will cause its downfall.