• TwentySeven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    There are seven continents.

    Eurasia, Africa, America, Antarctica, Australia, Greenland and Zealandia.

    Change my mind.

  • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Europe is actually more a collection of large islands that have temporarily decided to exist as a unified land mass because Africa and Asia are squeezing it from both sides (geologically speaking)

    • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Geologically speaking India and surroundings are also not Asia but a separate continent running into Asia creating the Himalayas

        • Klear@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Continent is an arbitrary division not consistently backed by any actual geological features.

                • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I’d appreciate if you could answer the question. Do you perhaps have another geologic feature to propose? If you want to use large landmasses, then islands don’t belong to any continents at all. If you don’t set a minimum size, then there are far too many continents to remember. So what is it?

  • irate944@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Iirc we have the ancient greeks to thank for the current distinction. They named Europe the region north of greece, and Asia the region west of Anatolia, and then eventually decided that their actual boundary should be the middle of the black sea

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m pretty sure China calling itself “central county” probably plays some role as well.

      • irate944@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        That would be eventually. But back then, Europe and Asia weren’t continents, they were names of undetermined regions that were north or east of them respectively.

        I don’t know when or who decided “you know what? This whole region? It’s a continent, and let’s call it Europe” (maybe the Romans? Or even the Greeks?).

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    s/

    Disgusting Kazhaqstan-centric world view. smh

    How dare you?! Obviously [other point on sphere] is the superior point of reference.

    /s

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      As a Russian, I’m always bewildered why everyone else seems to refer to Europe and Asia as separate continents. Like, y’all blind or something? Look at the map!

      And if you think it’s about geology or something, nuh-uh. It’s just a random convention coming from ancient perceptions, and it is heavily wrong. Eurasia is a single continent, and always has been.

      • scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Basically the idea was that the mountains caused Europe to develop mostly separately from Asia.

        Tbh I always thought it was silly too. Continents have always been more vibes based than anything and unless we’re reverse engineering Victorian race science I don’t think there’s a compelling argument.

  • eta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Now I want a version from Europe’s perspective where China would be something like Eastern Eastern Eastern Europe

  • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Asia was named such by the Europeans, meaning something like ‘the land of the sunrise’ and thus referencing its Eastern position relative to Europe.

    Etymonline cites a possible Akkadian origin for ‘europe’ meaning ‘to go down, set’, which would mirror the origin for the word ‘asia’.

    In other words, Europe and Asia might literally mean ‘the western and eastern bit,’ making perfect sense.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      c. 1300, from Latin Asia, from Greek Asia, speculated to be from Akkadian asu “to go out, to rise,” in reference to the sun, thus “the land of the sunrise.” Used by the early Greeks of what later was known as Asia Minor; by Pliny of the whole continent.

      https://www.etymonline.com/word/Asia

      • blibla@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        whereas europe means … wide face xd

        Often explained as “broad face,” from eurys “wide” (see eury-) + ops “face,” literally “eye” (from PIE root *okw- “to see”). But also traditionally linked with Europa, Phoenician princess in Greek mythology. Klein (citing Heinrich Lewy) suggests a possible Semitic origin in Akkad. erebu “to go down, set” (in reference to the sun) which would parallel occident. Another suggestion along those lines is Phoenician 'ereb “evening,” hence “west.”

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Thus reaulting in Eurasia being the setting and rising land, which is fitting because the sun certainly does do both things there from what I hear (I’ve only been to North America according to the tectonicists in this thread)

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The best European invention was the Suez canal, preventing people from realising that Africa is also the same landmass.

    I propose we dig a similar canal from the north of Russia to the Black sea to unambiguously become a continent. Some would argue Caspian sea is more appropriate, but come on: Connecting the Black sea to the White sea? That’s poetic.

    This plan would cost trillions, benefit no one and have devastating consequences for millions of people. I will not be answering questions.