• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly? I would love to take a 2-day trip to London on an airship. That sounds like a great adventure. You’re not on a ship, so you don’t get seasick, and you’re not on a plane, so there’s plenty of room to move around.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have a few flight hours at the controls of a Cessna-152 (never did took it all the way to an Amateur Pilot License because it’s a pretty expensive hobby, at least in Europe) and still remember just how bad the first few flights were until I got used to it: in a small plane you feel every little shitty-shit updraft/downdraft/windshear caused by the most stupid of things (say, the wind hitting the boundary of a forest or the asphalt of a car park heated by the sun more than the surrounding area).

        Lets just say I was green in more ways than one in those first couple of flights.

        It didn’t help that the arfield where I did my training was near enough a major international airport and we weren’t allowed to go above 3000 feet unless quite far way from the airfield, because of the Terminal Approach Ways for landings and takeoffs in that airport.

        Granted, the bigger the aircraft the less the “up and down and wiggle it all around” feeling of flying is, but it’s still quite surprising just how bad the damn thing is on a perfectly normal day if you’re only 1 km or less from the ground.

    • Hank@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you take a look at the cabin? Seems in line with something like a private jet.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, if they actually manage to run a passenger line for a little while I’ll try to go for a ride on it - you know, just to see it before they go bankrupt.

      But that’s the thing, it’s only attractive as an “adventure” or publicity stunt (I can see a short-lived market for “influencers”), kind of like taking passenger rail in the US - it’s fun to ride the train when you can afford multiple days of travel time. The difference is, freight rail is practical, useful and economically viable and pays the maintenance cost of the rail lines. This gasbag won’t ever be useful in that sense, and it won’t ever have value as a regular commuter vehicle.

      The only practical use I can see for this is if you need to stay in the air over a particular area for an extended time - maybe an observation platform? but you could just put cameras on a smaller, cheaper balloon…

      None of the proposed use cases make sense.

      Another important niche could be responding to natural disasters like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and hurricanes.

      This is a farcical pipe dream. How would it respond? It can’t carry enough weight to be useful, and a helicopter would be faster and more flexible for delivering medical personnel or extracting victims. If there’s one thing you want in emergency response, it’s speed. And you certainly wouldn’t take this thing anywhere near a recently erupted volcano or a hurricane because the air currents would be crazy hazardous for a lighter-than-air vehicle.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could make all those arguments about cruise ships, yet they still exist. At least this will be more environmentally friendly

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, and I could see some equivalent to a cruise line possibly, but that’s really it… there’s no practical use for this, only tourist stuff.

          Also cruise ships are like floating hotels with hundreds of rooms, with giant shopping malls and resorts attached. You don’t get any of that on an airship because there isn’t enough space or carrying capacity.

        • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cruise ships are more about the amenities on board. Not sure how many amenities you could get on an airship because of the weight. So it would be a two days boring as hell trip and most people aren’t going to give up the vacay time to sit around and do nothing.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, so we need holodecks! Someone convince Bezos or Musk that they are feasible “in five years,” or “next year.”

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean… if you have some idea for creating the kind of matter/energy conversion technology needed for a holodeck you’d probably end up richer than both of them combined.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i bet they would milk the available space for every inch like they do on planes lol

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They won’t if they want to keep any benefit compared to airplanes

          • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s the benefit of a cruise ship when planes are so much faster?

            Its not always about purely practical concerns

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The benefit of a cruise ship is that you can fit a massive hotel, shopping mall, resort and maybe even theme park rides on it.