• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m on fully on team Fuck AI.

    but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

    Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

      It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Trumps reactions was probably something along the lines of “shut up stupid piggy, you are stupid and fake, also ugly. I am going to call you pig intelligence from now on.”

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s not too bad honestly. It wouldn’t tell me how to center a div, which it stated was out of the scope of its purpose.

    I asked it a citizenship question and it did a good job linking resources to find that question, which is honestly an issue with our current government websites.

    The best feature seems to be that it will just tell you it doesn’t know instead of making up some bullshit.

    Not something I would call “Super Intelligent”, but good enough for the purpose it was given.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m convinved the whole “Super intelligent” thing is just to give him a response whenever asked about AI. He doesn’t understand it nor it’s risks, he just knows the people bribing him care a LOT about it. In recent interviews whenever someone asks him about AI he just talks about the “”“”“rebrand”“”“”" to SI.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.

    That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It’s such a cringe term :D

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is why I’ll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to “save us” but we already know the answer. We just don’t care. We’re not going to listen to AI if we don’t listen to ourselves.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.

      There is no reason to trust AI’s reasoning on what could “save us” even if it offered one.

        • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m not sure if there is some subtext being lost, but if your point is that we should trust AI with how to ‘save us’, then why aren’t you following it right now? It’s perfectly happy to offer an answer and it will even sound very convincing. But there is no reason to think it actually has the correct answer, or even knows what the problem is.

          • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            No, my point is that even if the AI was 100% correct and gave humanity the best advice to solve all of our problems, we still wouldn’t follow it. Because we don’t want to. We live in a society that’s broken on purpose, and a lot of people want to keep it that way, and have convinced a great many people to support things against humanity’s own interest.

            • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              If an AI was provably 100% correct then I guarantee you people would listen to it.

              People seek for god & other higher powers for much less reasonable logic than “a machine that is always correct no matter what”.

              The reality is AI as it’s known today (generative stochastic models) can not ever reach “100% correct”, by definition of being a generative stochastic model. So you’re essentially discussing a fantasy computer that we are not close to every having IRL -> It’s not relevant.

              • Prime@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                Disagree. The AI will say things like taxing the rich more or preserve nature etc. Society won’t listen to that, or more precisely won’t follow this advice, because the deciders do not like this idea.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          what humans have written

          a highly curated selection that panders to the views of the AI’s sponsors

          • Peacepath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            We are not yet at the point LLM are so dependent on advertising and “partnerships” that they are totally biased in favor of specific brands… not yet…

            Take a time to anticipate how the actual state will soon be regreted…

            • tetris11@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Im just hoping that the LLMs that are trained to push views that are at odds with reality struggle with basic reasoning, making them inferior models to LLMs trained on a more diverse worldview. I hope.

              • Peacepath@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                My guess is we will see some less convenient models, that gives better result but a “weird” way ; and far more very convenient models, easy to use, but that generate advertisings as a result (maybe even with promo codes!)…

                Remember how internet search have evolved, how youtube has became, how everything went when finance guys decided it was time for harvest…

                Now look at this new field, see how they grow it… what are the odds their plan is to harvest it at some point?

      • SHY_TUCKER@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s not true. For less than $15k and a high electricity bill, you can train and run very powerful AI models yourself, today. And you have broad choices of which open weight model to run. And it’s easy to switch them out. No “they” in the mix at all

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago
          1. 99% of people do not have 15k to spend on AI

          2. nor do they have extra money to pay high electricity bills NOR pay for good information feeds to feed the model

          3. for now. “They” are just beginning the legislative process. In 20 years what will the landscape lookblike? What kinds of blocks, filters, gov reporting will be mandated?

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            If in 20 years time having a graphics card is illegal, y’all might as well go ahead and collectively commit sudoku as a nation.

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Between phones, tablets, and data centers the age of mass market affordable PC parts is fading.

              Hope it rebounds but idk.

        • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m keen on local models but prices are getting out of hand. I insured my workstation recently for more than twice what I built it for, because it’d cost that to rebuild it with identical parts.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            My graphics card, which I bought used, is now worth more than the entire rest of my computer was new. This is nuts!

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m sure this was done in a financially responsible and small government way, right republicans?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I like the suggestion that they would include top secret documents in its training data. Although I wouldn’t be surprised from this administration.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    They locked it down pretty hard to answer only government questions

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      At least AI hasn’t raped kids.

      Yes it has made child porn of them, but that’s because sick fucks asked it to.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This would be funnier if any of them had an ounce of self-awareness and shame. As it is- those that should really take a lesson from this, won’t.