Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I’d love to know what NASA has planned for it.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I guess we can put to rest the idea that the US government has successfully reverse engineered UFOs. Because if they had, there would be absolutely no need to do this if we could fly anywhere in the world in minutes or seconds and invisibly.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    They want a jet that works. It’s not NASA’s SR-71, the SR-71 was made by Lockheed.

    F35s are chronically grounded with software issues. They want a plane that works.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s fun speculation to assume this is for military reasons but remember nasa s a civilian agency. Perhaps it’s connected to their research on supersonic and hypersonic flights

    • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Or someone as NASA got a fun project greenlit. They threw it into the budget for the lulz, and it didn’t get cut. 😆

      You’re most likely correct. They need a really fast plane to test sonic boom dampening at Mach 3+ speeds, and they can’t build a specialty plane yet.

  • Unsealed9041@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Its going to be the most basic grift possible, they’re going to read your credit card numbers.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    They fired all the people who knew how to build shit and now they are desperately sending a bunch of newbies to “reverse engineer” the plane and try to figure out how it works. /s

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I mean, it’s not that old of an airframe. I’m only middle aged and I saw the last time it flew in 1991. My dad just retired from the FAA a couple years ago and when he was in the military he maintained the flight suits for the SR71 and U2 programs.

        The original engineers may have passed, but the crew and engineers responsible for the huge amount of maintenance for the airframe are still around and probably have more functional knowledge about the airframe than the designers.

            • HelloDingo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Sorry, I’m terrible about seeing my notifications. Yep, we were at Beale between 94 & 98, but overseas before and after that.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                No worries, same here. We were there from 96-00, there’s a good chance we’ve run into each other before! There’s an even better chance that our fathers worked together in some capacity, it was a relatively tiny base and the U2 program was pretty small.

                I think Beale was one of my favorite bases I’ve ever lived on, I used to go hiking in the foot hills basically everyday during summer. I feel like it was small and remote enough where you could get into a lot of shit as a kid without ever really getting in any trouble.

                By chance did you guys ever go to one of the Christmas parties in the old skunk works building?

                • HelloDingo@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Not me personally, we lived off-base and I was only about 12 when we left-- but my folks probably did for sure!

                  Funnily enough, I’ve been helping them clean out their kitchen so they can have it redone and the sheer volume of old squadron/hangar dance/etc mugs they have absolutely beggars belief. I’d bet there’s one or two in the hoard that corresponds to one of the dances you’re thinking of.

        • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Manufacturing and design knowledge is mostly lost and rediscovered every few decades by the US. On one project or the other

        • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Only a few more years before the mesothelioma takes the last of the maintenance crew, that thing was genuinely filled nose to tail (proverbially, it was actually full of fuel) with asbestos

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Based on their work on the X-59, I wonder if they just want to collect sensor data on its sonic boom characteristics, and feed that into a model for sonic booms.

      They don’t need to be able to build something in order to be able to learn something from that thing in operation.

      • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        So Space Cowboys 2, except

        • Everybody passes the physicals just fine, but all decide to quit instead of going through the onboarding process
        • The young punk bad guys in the movie are secretly trying to get an LLM to redesign it, but can’t because the Blackbird was a skunkworks program and some key principal either never got written down or DOGE cut the funding to restore the microfiche with the details so all the details got destroyed
      • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah but what everyone forgets is that knowledge can be relearned if you do it right.

        And the issue of Fogbank was eventually solved by having modern day scientist study the problem (it was something like contamination of boron being used to make the fogbank material.)

        The SR71 could be manufactured today if we wanted to. It wasn’t built with some magical spells that are forever lost to history. There are more people alive now that know how to machine titanium than there were when they built them originally. Its just a matter of investment in the labor and tooling to make them again, which probably isn’t worth it which is why they’ll keep flying the remaining planes.

        One of the worse internet “I’m smart” thoughts is that “we’ve lost the ability to make insert outdated item because all that talent is dead.” Ok, so retrain new talent like every generation has to do anyways and maybe next time don’t pinch pennies and shutdown the factory with all these gods of manufacturing, instead bring in apprentices and have them learn from these masters.

        But what about the profit margins and the shareholders?!?!? PE firms can’t milk successful companies to death for $$$$ if they actually invest in talent.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Absolutely, and although they did re-invent Fogbank, it took almost 100 millions, makes me wonder what would it cost to keep the knowledge from disappearing in the first place

          • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Nothing about producing nuclear weapons, let alone miniaturized thermo-nuclear devices optimized to get the most efficient reaction during detonation is cheap. And the knowledge wasn’t necessarily lost, that is impossible to determine since we’re dealing with highly classified secrets regarding the construction of a nuclear weapon.

            It’s possible that while making fogbank they merely got a contaminated batch of boron. Let’s say, for example, you find your grandma’s recipe for apple pie. But when your mother tastes it she says it’s a little off. You then eventually realize that you used apples that weren’t ripe yet, or that grandma used apples that were beginning to get soft. Thats not really the same as “lost knowledge” it’s more an experience gap.

            Clickbait always makes these things sound like we’ve lost this information and now we’re screwed because it can never be relearned and no one knows anything oh no doom and gloom. Truth is lots of knowledge, through-out history, has been “lost” and then “rediscovered” primarily because this info becomes less valued/important and eventually someone needs it again so they rediscover it. Happened alot with mathematical theories and concepts, like calculus.

            No one wants to lose knowledge but no one wants to pay to keep it alive the proper way (master/apprentice system that ensures these tricks of the trade are continually passed on) so we favor a system where specialized experts (scientists) are called in to solve these issues and rediscover the tricks of the trade using the scientific process. Either way you pay for the knowledge but we wanted to save money and shutter a bunch of cold-war era defense companies when the cold-war ended. The consequences of that are when you want to resume making nuclear weapons of the quality America demands you have to hire those scientists to figure out all the pesky details like fogbank.

  • Kintarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Mysterious, won’t say why, what are they hiding the shocking truth they aren’t telling you….

  • Miller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    A famous popstar paid people to smuggle live chickens into his hotel room every night. He paid other people to smuggle them back out.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Probably because the Pedo-in-Chief saw it in a movie. I swear that’s how he gets some of his stupid fucking ideas-- like the reopening of Alcatraz. You can’t tell me that moron didn’t just finish watching The Rock (nic Cage movie) when he decided that.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I mean it flew in operations up until 1990 and its last actual flight was in 1999.

      We can’t really build stuff like that anymore. The people who designed it had an intuitive grasp for aeronautics. You can’t teach intuition to a computer.

      I mean that’s just a silly claim, the HTV-2 drone has literally gone mach 20, which is nearly 10 times faster than the SR71. Plus the SR72 project is currently in development with aims to be nearly twice as fast as the SR71.

    • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yes, we can build such stuff these days. There is no shortage of engineers in the USA, there is a shortage of employers willing to pay well.

      There is no shortage of experienced machinist, in fact we have far more advanced manufacturing capabilities than we did in the 1950’s. We just have a smaller industrial footprint than we did in the 1950’s but there are plenty of companies that can machine titanium (in fact there are more machinist nowadays that know how to machine titanium because its more common than it was in the 1950’s.)

      The shortage is in investors willing to invest in talented labor and the tooling to make the aircraft. The idea that we “lost” these skills is a general misunderstanding of how things work and reddit-tier click-bait “i’m smart” type headlines.

      Yes, we can build a lunar lander even thought all the guys who built the original are dead. It would be a better lander than the originals. Yes, we can build rocket engines as good or better than the F1’s on the Saturn V. In fact SpaceX developed engine technology that far surpasses the F1’s for their boosters and just because they didn’t make 5 gigantic ones (opting for 33 smaller units) doesn’t mean they aren’t a better platform. The Saturn V couldn’t land it’s booster to be reused later on.