• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    these boys need their mother’s to whoop their asses and their dads to whip them into shape.

    “oh boys will be boys”

    no. boys will be whatever you let them be, and if you let them be perverted pieces of shit they grow up to be perverted pieces of shit.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I guarantee most of these schools protect the bullies and punish the victims. Like if a girl being harassed broke the glasses, she would get expelled. The world is the way it is because people enable and worship bullies across the board.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      Schools don’t care about bullying or sexual harassment as long as it doesn’t look bad on them. If it can be swept under the rug, they will ignore it.

      At least that is my experience from schools in the UK.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This. My friend in HS went to guidance multiple times to complain about being bullied by another classmate. After the 2nd or 3rd time requesting thy switch his class, they decided to resolve the issue by forcing them to be partners for an assignment in class. He complained again, and was told to deal with it. One day my friend finally cracked and broke the bully’s nose because he had enough and clearly the school was only willing to make this worse, so they called the police on my friend. It’s pretty insane how some things get dealt with sometimes.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        I wish they called the police when I stood up for myself. It was sexual harassment/assault but I didn’t know that at the time, I just knew I didn’t like it so used violence. He stopped and ran off bleeding all over the place.

        Totally valid self defence from a legal perspective. But they only used the threat of calling the police and I was absolutely terrified so just shut down.

    • arararagi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In a different video, the same boy films another upset girl approaching him with a metal stool in her hands. An adult intervenes before anyone is hurt.

      Exactly, they always protect the bullies.

  • Monument@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People are being disgusting, using technology that was designed to be stealthy on purpose by others for disgusting reasons (to normalize allowing ever greater data collection by tech companies - no surprise the privacy protections are trivially easy to defeat), and are posting videos online for a reason - that they get satisfaction from it.

    I guess I don’t care if this makes me sound old or callous, but we need to bully these people. Make the people who post and share these videos embarrassed. Tell them they look like stupid losers who can’t get dates or talk to people. Make them feel bad for not being kind and socially connecting with others. Give them no community or understanding until they stop breaking the social contract.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      the only 3 usecases for these are:

      Assholes

      Perverts

      Blind people - sucks for them, because the first two are going to ruin it before it benefits anyone with disabilities

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What social contract? The kids wearing these can’t value something they’ve never known.

  • olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Here they’re not even allowing students to carry mobile phones inside of schools. How is this even allowed?

    • wittymyusername@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Here they’re not even allowing students to carry

      Thought for sure you were setting up an “Americans Love Guns” joke.

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hoooold up just a minute. How much do these glasses cost? Like hundreds right? What kind of teen boy has that much money to burn? I sure as fuck didn’t, and I worked. Their parents bought them, and these are kids, so it’s 100% blame on the parents here.

    • magnue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No different to mobile phones or iPods or PlayStations. Pair of meta raybans are arguably cheaper than those items now due to inflation.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even if the kids bought them it is still the parent’s responsibility to keep their kid from being an obnoxious pervert.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        That’s what really sucks about this.

        There’s no institutional backlash. (At least not yet. That could change.)

        We’re depending on parents who park these little shits in front of screens and expect to be left alone while their kids are radicalized.

        • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The alternative is having the rich parents be responsible for the children they breed and that will never happen so suck it up poors

    • Geologist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I had thousands as a teenager from around 15 years old working part time evening and weekends at barely above minimum wage.

      When you have no expenses from living at home, you can save everything (and in my case blow it all on electronics lol)

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      When I was 16 and started working, I quickly had enough money saved from working minimum wage, part time, to buy myself a car. It’s not impossible.

      Also, these may be kids/young adults, but they should all know right from wrong. Blame is absolutely on the students who use these too.

  • BlakeFox808@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The girls need to fight back with photos of them. Watch how fast they put a stop to it.

  • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    this article is stupid for another reason: go on youtube and look up camcorder footage of public high schools in the 90s.

    absolutely NOBODY is anxious about getting filmed, and nobody has bad intentions, and nobody would write an article about it.

    maybe things ARE worse but maybe the situation is more complex than meta glasses.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In the 90s we didn’t have kids recording things for clout and follows. Kids with camcorders were the alt or nerd crowd doing it for themselves or at most local cable access.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      In the 90s, camcorders were a relative novelty and nobody had any reason to be anxious about being filmed because there was no way to easily share video with millions of strange people maliciously for clout. If you were caught doing something funny, you might appear on TV after signing a release. (e.g. America’s Funniest Home Videos) Sharing video on the internet was a practical technical impossibility, and people had mostly private lives. You’re right it’s not really the glasses, it’s the internet and social media. I wouldn’t be surprised if the first person POV provided by glasses makes content like that more compelling, though, and thus more common.

      People covertly filmed for malicious reasons even back then of course, but it was not generally made available to the masses.

      If I have a point, it’s that I don’t think this is evidence that we’re more fucked up now than we were then, just that technology has enabled new kinds of abuse that were inconceivable back then.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I think young men don’t know how to flirt anymore. I think many of them think they are flirting in some weird way but they have no clue that they are actually bothering/pestering/harassing these woman. I mean I know too many young men that don’t have licences, don’t know how to use a lawn mower, can’t ride a bike, completely useless men…just can’t do anything besides go to school play video games and not much else.

    I do blame technology. Keep your kids off online gaming imo. Bust out the old games or only let them play offline games on a console or PC. Especially no cell phone games. Cut YouTube to practically nothing. Get them outside…

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This has nothing to do with flirting. They harass girls to feel in control and take out their dating frustration on someone else

    • thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think about the issues with modern dating often, flirting included. One of my perspectives is dating culture is an extension of social culture which is an extension of communal culture, and unfortunately communal culture is dying in America. From something as common as college kids getting educated out of state then starting their career at a 3rd location, to something more systemic like the formation of the rust belt, local communities have been eroding.

      Without an established generational history of people talking, connecting, enjoying each other, flirting, and dating no one can really know the difference between expressing interest and harassment as that difference now depends on what your algorithm says and what your echo chambers reinforce.

      In short everyone is playing by a different set of social rules, video games may play a part in this via social isolation, but I think the greater socioeconomic system we’re all bound to is much more culpable.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My landlords raise my rent every year, forcing me to move every year.

        Why would I bother to foster a sense of community when the community will throw me out at the nearest convenience for profit?

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In my eyes anyone wearing one of these is a pervert. I simply don’t see who else could be the audience for a purposefully discreet camera built into a pair of glasses. Even Google’s attempt at glasses were more overt that these. I’d say Meta is shameful, but that’s not exactly a shocker to anyone at this point.

    Edit: Seen a few suggestions, but my counterpoint to all of them is - you don’t need the camera to discreet fir any of these purposes. You’d only need it to be discreet if you didn’t want people to realise you were filming, which just seems aimed towards perverts in my mind.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I would have loved glasses that could detect advertising with a camera and block it out so I don’t see it, but instead we got AI nudes and stalking.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Aww man you just made me realise that you could combine A.I. image generation with augmented reality to make everyone nude in real time. What a fucked up world we live in. I’m sure someone is already working on a program like this

        • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 minutes ago

          Not just nude, but any race, any age, any species. Or, make some or all people disappear from view. Not just people but everything around you will look however you want it to (or can afford to pay someone else to make it so.) Clothes will become simple, disposable leotards with markings that make it easy for AR to overlay any style of “clothes”. We’ll broadcast our selection to the surrounding goggles, and they can either show that, or whatever they want. Of course sound is part of it too, so your Puerto Rican “friend” can look like and sound like Princess Diana to you.

          But wait, there’s more. Let’s say you’re walking down a busy street and your boss is out that day too. He’ll be able to spot you from blocks away, and even through buildings, tracking your location and following you until he “happens to bump into you.” A feature reserved for certain “elites” and “officials” in society. Whatever information you have available about the people around you will appear floating around them, like a health bar. You think we have no privacy now, wait till everyone knows the basics about you and can pay to know even more, and have it appear above your head and whispered in their ear.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And probably even more ads sent directly to your eyeballs. If they’re not there yet they’re already on the roadmap.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So much potential. Face lookup of contacts so I get reminded of people’s names. Lyrics to any detected song so I can sing along. Virtual post-it note reminders in 3D space. Alerts or navigation while walking. Virtual monitors put on any surface.
      But humans are too hung up on sex, so it’s not going to happen.

    • riot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I remember seeing a video of a blind woman using them, in combination with some earbuds, so she could get her surroundings described to her, as well as have objects she picked up described. But you’re right, glasses with discreet cameras on them, aren’t necessary for a situation like that - Something more overt would be fine for that use case.

    • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I would love overt google glass style glasses that are obvious as a solution for a dashcam like system for when i am driving, or tracking where I left mg keys etc. But as you say, the discreet camera is for perverts.

      • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s probably the clearest if a built-in camera is not allowed for glasses and the camera is an external unit they have to clip on. Functional the same, but socially making it clear you’re filming.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even Google’s attempt at glasses were more overt that these.

      That’s because the tech wasn’t there yet. Otherwise, it would have been the same.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I kind of like the idea. Take some pictures while doing other things like riding your bike or going on a hike without having to take out your phone. Take a quick picture while shopping to them to my wife. Get navigation cues without the phone. But they are so creepy

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve seen videos on Instagram of people using them for a first person view without having to strap a GoPro to their head. Like for hobby work.

        But if you’re going biking or whatever, you can just as easily strap a camera to your helmet, and get a 360° view to boot. If you’re hiking or shopping, it’s very little effort to take out your phone and snap a pic. And you get the benefit of being able to actually preview the shot.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Stop blaming the kids, it’s the corporation’s fault. Title should be Meta glasses are recording and enabling harassment of underaged school children

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      These kids absolutely know it’s wrong. Stop enabling bullies. The kids should NOT get a pass for this just because some corporation did something wrong first.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah. The kids are just the last part of the chain of failure here. Why is Meta producing such a thing? Why the fuck are parents buying several hundred dollars worth of spy glasses for their children and sending them to school with them without any supervision? And what the fuck is the school doing here? The first report of someone harassing other pupils with such a device should be reason to ban them and take hard discipline measures against the harrasser

    • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The glasses shouldn’t exist but what parents are buying these for their kids?! Blame the parents too.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Seems like something title 9 should be used to quash, but civil rights for women are only important if transgender people exist in public somewhere

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Teen Boys Men of all ages Are Using Meta Glasses to Terrorize sexually harass Girls women of all ages at High Schools and Middle Schools everywhere.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Is there any actual data to support the claim you’re making, or are you taking a few viral videos and using them as a means to support your own implicit bias?

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Data.

          Stats.

          Compilation of actual, verified reports.

          But, your response does answer my question, and you should know it’s not 2014 anymore. No matter how fashionable your algorithm has made you think that it is to smear men as a whole, the rest of the world has seen how ridiculous it is.

          If you think you get to lump me or your male friends in with these people without being asked to prove it, you should maybe have enough respect for the men in your life that you esteem to actually hunt down some evidence before posting things like this.

          Have a great day.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Asking for proof? Should be a very easy thing to provide given how confident you are that, apparently, this is an epidemic among men.

              Far be it from all of us to pretend we’re guilty just because you presume we are.

              I’m sorry, but you’re being very unreasonable. I hope one day the men in your orbit stop quietly accepting that you say things like this.

              • athatet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Nowhere did anyone say ‘all men are doing this’ the OP just changed it from ‘teen boys’ to ‘men of all ages’

                Fucking chill.

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.

    Couple this w/ the AI nudification sites and this is gonna be insane. Teen boys don’t think big picture…

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    so if perverts are not allowed on school property and it is considered private space for that reason…

    so who is enforcing that law?

    the fuck happened to this society? everyone just seems to be victims all the time. no doers.