• Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It is just a concept right now. It has not yet delivered any live births.

    “Despite optimism, experts state that the technology is still far from full implementation.” https://thaitimes.com/a-robot-to-give-birth-the-chinese-announcement-that-shakes-the-world

    The same proposed robot went viral in 2025 but was entirely fake: https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/pregnancy-robot-from-china-is-fake-but-is-the-technology-behind-it-possible

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why yes women having to carry pregnancies for nine months and then having to go through the pains of giving birth is a good thing we should not relieve them of that burden even when technology allows that thank you for asking.

    • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bet the price will be absolutely prohibitive, letting only the rich use them.

      Bet it will be used to shield the rich from the consequences of failing medical systems.

      I’m not saying it’s a bad technology, I’m saying it’s being developed by the time, money, and effort, and for the benefit of parasites, assuming it’s not just marketing for a cash-grab startup.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah yes, break the bonds that bind family and ultimately society together to “protect women”. It is only lethal in places with shitty medical car…okay I see where you are going with this.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          break the bonds that bind family

          Nine months in utero counts for more than your first 18 years of life?

          I’ll need to break my adopted brother the terrible news

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sorry to break reality to you and him.

            Also, we are talking about an artificial womb so you wouldn’t have a mother.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Do you not realize that an artificial womb still uses a fertilized human egg? Like, genetically, there’s still two human parents.

              It’s not like someone is going to fuck a robot and get it pregnant.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Your mother gives birth to you. She doesn’t just donate genetic material. She carries you inside her for 9 months before pushing you out and holding you as you take your first breathe. This is the way it has been for millions of years.

                What people are proposing is breaking that human cycle. Eliminating the investment of time body and soul into the next generation. Pretending this wouldn’t have significant impacts on our society is farcical. Population could literally be controlled by whoever has the money.

                We would also likely end up in a Gattaca situation because who would want to spend the money on a defective baby. Crispr babies raised by the government or corporations doesn’t sound like a future I would look forward to.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is a lot that happens in utero. Sharing the mother’s immune system, learning the voice of the mother and people around them, not to mention the various hormonal changes that prepare the mother physically and psychologically to care for an infant.

            Pregnancy can be dangerous but we really need to be careful whenever we introduce new medical technology.

  • huppakee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lovely how they went from having a one-child policy to having ∞-child capabilities in just a few decades.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why the fuck does it have to have a robot body?

    What’s the point? Just make an artificial womb and be done with it.

    Just tacking on dog shit robotics just means it’s needlessly complex and has more fault areas.

    More dumbass tech shit.

    • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The answer is: gen AI slop.

      However, the obsession with bi-pedal robots is creepy and weird.

      I watched someone on YouTube talking about it but can’t remember the channel.

      Basically, there is no single task for which bipedal is the best format, it’s only suitable for the range of tasks humans can perform. However, we just don’t have the tech to make that format viable. As in, they can’t do the dishes or clean the bathroom or take out the trash.

      Demonstrations of bots doing those things are in tightly controlled environments with loads of programmed parameters.

      Its appealing because everyone wants a humanoid to order around, but that’s about it.