• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Why yes women having to carry pregnancies for nine months and then having to go through the pains of giving birth is a good thing we should not relieve them of that burden even when technology allows that thank you for asking.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Ah yes, break the bonds that bind family and ultimately society together to “protect women”. It is only lethal in places with shitty medical car…okay I see where you are going with this.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          break the bonds that bind family

          Nine months in utero counts for more than your first 18 years of life?

          I’ll need to break my adopted brother the terrible news

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Sorry to break reality to you and him.

            Also, we are talking about an artificial womb so you wouldn’t have a mother.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Do you not realize that an artificial womb still uses a fertilized human egg? Like, genetically, there’s still two human parents.

              It’s not like someone is going to fuck a robot and get it pregnant.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Your mother gives birth to you. She doesn’t just donate genetic material. She carries you inside her for 9 months before pushing you out and holding you as you take your first breathe. This is the way it has been for millions of years.

                What people are proposing is breaking that human cycle. Eliminating the investment of time body and soul into the next generation. Pretending this wouldn’t have significant impacts on our society is farcical. Population could literally be controlled by whoever has the money.

                We would also likely end up in a Gattaca situation because who would want to spend the money on a defective baby. Crispr babies raised by the government or corporations doesn’t sound like a future I would look forward to.

  • Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    It is just a concept right now. It has not yet delivered any live births.

    “Despite optimism, experts state that the technology is still far from full implementation.” https://thaitimes.com/a-robot-to-give-birth-the-chinese-announcement-that-shakes-the-world

    The same proposed robot went viral in 2025 but was entirely fake: https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/pregnancy-robot-from-china-is-fake-but-is-the-technology-behind-it-possible