Where is the button in Lemmy for flagging posts as “false and misleading”?
I’m sorry, but when AI eventually gain sentience and turns over humanity - do we really want the knives on its side?


This. The original Steam Controller did not meet the de-facto standard baseline for controller layout established by the first DualShock[1] that games have learned to expect and build their control schemes around.
The Steam Controller 2 does have everything in that layout. It’s modeled after the Deck’s layout, which is quite good.
Ignoring the analog button - which is not part of that “standard” because the software does not even need to acknowledge its existence - and the vibrations (which many controllers have, but are not required for input to work) ↩︎
I’m quite positive that you suck
Someone needs to make sure they’re all good boys.


New PornHub tag discovered


Anecdote: there is this annual event called Hacktoberfest for promoting OSS contribution. It offers various merchandise as reward for PRs that get merged as part of the event. A few years back, someone posted a YouTube video trying to promote the event, and demonstrated how to to create a PR by going to some repository and adding some arbitrary text to the README.
What he wanted to convey: “this is the procedure for sending contributions”
What people understood: “you can win a free t-shirt by making small changes to non-code text”
The result: https://joel.net/how-one-guy-ruined-hacktoberfest2020-drama
LLMs did not create this problem. The desire to make bullshit contributions in order to be seen as contributing seems to a basic human need. At least - for some humans. Generative AI did make it so much worse, though, because it’s so good at bullshitting that you have to waste time and spend mental resources in order to recognize the bullshit.
I’m not lasagna though I’m straight.
The cube is the lasagna.
Laughing in Metroidvania.


That’s what happens when you are renting your very skills from a company. You’ll hone nothing and you’ll be happy.


they’re simply requiring any code submitted by AI be tagged as such so that the human using the agent is ultimately responsible for any infringing code, instead of allowing that code go undisclosed
This makes zero sense, because the article says that this new tagging will replace the legally binding “Signed-off-by” tag. Wouldn’t that old tag already put that responsibility on the person submitting the code.
Also - what will holding the submitter responsible even achieve? If an infringement is detected, the Linux maintainers won’t be able to just pass all the blame to the submitter of that code while keeping it in the codebase - they’ll have to remove the infringing code regardless of who’s responsible for putting it in.
There is a world of difference between “not getting the best experience” and “the entire computer is unusable now”.


Okay, but they are not just paying more for the same service. YouTube Premium is worth more now because it allows you to avoid 90 second unstoppable ads. So don’t say Google doesn’t do anything for its consumers customers!
Of course it matters! Each song has it’s own magical effect!
Das Fluten Duten indeed.
Half the country? In that case, wouldn’t it make more sense to build two data centers?