• xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Misleading headline.

    This was 3 out of hundreds of thousands of runs. And mainly due to misconfigurations not aggressive use of zero days.

    While it is possible to characterize this as a marketing stunt, it is equally possible to characterize this as transparency.

    It is an interesting story but do we really need the sensationalism?

  • python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It really isn’t hard to get out of a docker container. Especially when its config is vibecoded.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    [sets boulder up at the top of a hill and nudges it over]

    Oh my god, it did it all by itself!! Are we ready for the future of autonomous killer boulders??

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s path down the hill was algorithmically determined but it’s actually a black box so I can’t tell you why it followed the path it did at all actually.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It‘s so disheartening to see intelligent and somewhat tech savvy people around me buy into it. They treat these things almost like they‘re living beings and offload more of their own thinking capacity to chatbots. No amount of explaining how this is just one of countless publicity stunts can convince them. They‘re acting like I‘m the one who just doesn‘t understand technology while they‘re letting word salad influence how they think or even IF they think.

      • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        To be fair, talking to a chatbot like it’s a human, is a very effective way of getting the most useful responses out of them.

        • scytale@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          For casual conversations, maybe. But for actual computing tasks, it’s more effective to outline prompts and give it direct instructions without fluff.

          • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, without fluff and strict outlines, best is an actual template… But the prompts you give, are most easily given as if you’re talking to a 20 yo junior. Or maybe even better a 10 yo junior.

  • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Going rogue” makes LLMs seem more capable and independent than they are. AI companies don’t care if you think of it as benevolent or malevolent, as long as you see it as powerful. It’s advertising.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    My Roomba breached containment (I left my door open, but told it verbally that the door was closed)