Swedish VPN vendor Mullvad is facing a backlash from some customers after co-founder Daniel Berntsson personally donated SEK 5 million (£385,000, $519,000) to the controversial populist Örebropartiet, which is running in Sweden’s national elections for the first time.

Berntsson has this week published a blog post explaining the donation, alongside posts titled “Immigration,” “Political individualism,” and “Moral individualism.” Before that, he had not posted since 2019.

The flurry of posts follows weeks of customer criticism over the donation – for example, Finnish blog Moonwriting’s post “I’m done with Mullvad.” Another blog, Unutterable, is more direct: “Mullvad funding the far-right and the problem with tech company ownership.” The Hacker News discussion thread about the donations has reached a remarkable 1,784 comments so far.

Mullvad was co-founded and is still jointly owned and run by two CEOs, Berntsson and Fredrik Strömberg. Its name, as reflected in the company’s logo, is Swedish for “mole.” It also offers the Mullvad Browser, a privacy-enhanced fork of Firefox ESR co-developed with the Tor Project. Swedish socialist newspaper Flamman (“The Flame”) revealed the donation in its story “High-profile techie gives millions to the Örebro Party.”

In a post on X, the company said it was devoted to freedom of speech and tolerance, saying: “It should be obvious that Daniel’s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad’s values or mission, in the same way that someone’s opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn’t.”

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    It should be obvious that [founder’s] private donation to a political party is not part of [his company’s] values or mission

    Riiiiiiiiiight, because it always shakes out like that

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    There’s no equally good VPN company, by a wide margin.

    This guy’s a rich “libertarian anarchist” who donated to the new party of a marxist he followed because he wants lower taxes and less immigration.

    I don’t really even know what to make of that. Unlike the Proton guy who slobbered on the demented rapist’s bunghole, which I knew exactly what to make of it.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I have already quit my subscription. Haven’t taken the time to find an alternative yet. I’m stocked up on media for the time being.

    • HorseFD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 hour ago

      At this point it’s safer to just assume every purchase you make is funding far right politics.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes, although frankly it’s really fucking hard to name anything that isn’t these days. Like, you probably can’t even go grocery shopping without some of that money finding us way to alt right politics.

    • Garnish2087@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is a frustrating pposition to be in, particularly when few people are willing to offer viable alternatives in such threads.

      I don’t want to let a purity test be the reason I impulse switch to a less effective VPN, but don’t want to indirectly fund things I don’t support. Yes, money I spend on Mullvad might go towards shit I don’t want, but what else is on par with Mullvad that doesn’t have some other downside?

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        but don’t want to indirectly fund things I don’t support.

        The only safe way to do that is to not spend at all. Unless you find a co-op, your money is going to some owner(s) who will use the money as they please. Commercial VPNs are mostly privacy snake oil and ways to get access to media, so abstaining for a while isn’t unreasonable.

      • snoons@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Afaik IVPN is really the only alternative. I’ll be switching to them soon when my account expires.

    • guy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It seems so, and also who knows what else, maybe even the far left

  • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I made the switch to IPVN and it’s felt exactly the same. Maybe even better. Same price. Servers in multiple locations. Allows routing through 2 VPN servers. No logs. No money going to racist ideology.

    Mullvad can claim whatever they like about their values, but they are a for-profit company. The profits of the company are being used to fund racial segregation. If they believe in their values they’ll switch to a non-profit foundation. Until that time they can get fucked!

      • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nope they’re owned by a single person. I hope he’ll be more responsible. If you know of any non-profit vpn providers let me know! Happy to switch again

        • guy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          I had hoped you had any examples since you pointed out that it’s a for-profit company :/ Can’t do IPVN either than since who knows what the owner uses their money for.

    • Kelp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m curious if they offer port forwarding? That feature has been keeping me on PIA despite ethical concerns

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        AirVPN does port forwarding, and they’re less dodgy than PIA. Proton also does but there’s some questions raised by the CEOs support of Trump (still less dodgy than PIA though)

  • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “It should be obvious that Daniel’s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad’s values or mission, in the same way that someone’s opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn’t.”

    I’m not sure what they mean by this. Plenty of corporations do make animal rights, taxes, public healthcare, etc. an important part of their values and mission. Why would it be obvious that they’re not?

    Besides, we do want Nazis and fascists to be pariahs. Putting pressure on Mullvad not to associate is a good thing.

    • variaatio@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Specially in Nordics. Social corporate responsibility is a very long tradition in Nordics, specially with due to stuff like co-operative customer, producer or worker owned companies, state enterprises and so on.

      Including leadership teams behavior. Companies do get flack for what kind of persons they hire as leadership, since it is (pretty reasonably) assumed their mindset and worldview affects their conduct while leading the company.

      Plus not only is he leader, he is owner so again money to company’s pocket is in the end money to his pocket.

      One can’t claim “we are responsible company, while having opposite kind of CEO/leader”. It is his private matter he has these opinions, what isn’t private is him being company leader. Company doesn’t want his private opinions affecting the company, get rid of him as leader.

      It would be one thing, if he was “lineworker” employee. Then person can have private opinions don’t affect company. However he isn’t mere salary employee in the depths of server hall lifting and plugging in servers to racks and cleaning cooling equipment clean. He is company leadership.

      • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I agree (though I still think it is a good thing to fire fascists, even when they are lowly employees lol)

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The guy made a donation with his own money. His donation is no more Mullvads than a donation you make privately is representative of the company you work for.

      • jobbies@lemmy.zip
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The guy made a donation with his own money

        Uhh where do you think that money comes from?

        If you’ve bought Mullvad’s services you have unwittingly contributed to that donation.

        • guy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Every nazis salary comes from somewhere, or do you boycott just about everything?

          • jobbies@lemmy.zip
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            do you boycott just about everything?

            It’s just not buying stuff. You make it sound impossible.

            • guy@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 minutes ago

              No I mean, every nazis or racist gets their money from somewhere, be it Mullvad or Nestlé or Walmart, how do you avoid supporting that? Do you just don’t buy stuff from anywhere or do you have an ever shrinking base of viable options?

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes I fully understand how he gets money from being part owner of the company, I never said that wasn’t the casr. But how he chooses to spend his private cash is not the fault of Mullvad the company.

          I completely get wanting to boycott the company to avoid giving him money. But it makes no sense to blame the company for his private spending.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s absolutely people’s business whether they support the public face of a public company giving money to a public political party

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Like, what part of Mullvad not being responsible for the donation in any way is it that people are not understanding? The company had no control or say over this dudes donation, so they can’t be responsible for it. Sure, don’t buy mullvad so you avoid indirectly giving the nutjob more money to support his fascist political views, that’s a totally valid response. But It doesn’t change that Mullvad is not, and never can be, responsible for his donation.

      • illi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not sure how involved he is but I guess as a co-founder he is bound to be getting some of the Mullvad money

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yes of course he is. but once it leaves the company to pay him his share, Mullvad is not able to control of what that money is spent on whatsoever. Since he made a private decision outside the control or influence of the company, how couod Mullvad be accountable for it?

          • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 hours ago

            We get that the people who work for a jerk, are not responsible for the bad decisions of that jerk, and it’s a shame that they will suffer for his bad decisions, but that’s part of the risks you take as an employee, and there are a great many risks you take working for anyone, most of which the owner class refuse to acknowledge. We all recognize that it’s a struggle to find new employment, but they always have the option of finding a new company to work for.

            The owner is the primary beneficiary of any capital investment. Collateral damage for their decisions is their responsibility, not the consumer.

          • starblursd@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I agree… although I also understand people who feel the other way. As a top guy in the company the money he gets is going to be usually much more than an employee and for just existing at the top. So it feels more like company money than someone getting paid for actually putting in the grunt work to keep the company running. Not to mention that nobody is talking about mullvad and the ideology of random coder #26, the actions of the cofounder is always going to be in the same sentence as mullvad. So I understand taking a stance to not feed into that.

            However I don’t agree with the moral superiority stance that often (not always) comes with that viewpoint. By all means boycott them yourself but I’m not one to push that on others unless it is actually the company itself donating or if their views start poisoning the quality of the service they provide (brave for example)

      • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I always say there should be a hard cutoff at a million a year and you should be taxed 100% at anything over that.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 minutes ago

          I think it would be more effective to have a hard wealth (both liquid and non-liquid assets) cutoff of somewhere between $10-50 million rather than a cap on an annual income.

        • huey_m@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Even from a capitalist perspective this makes sense. Money pooling at the top is money not moving through the economy; 100% taxes encourage reinvestment and philanthropy to avoid the tax.

      • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        The point of wealth is heyying around limits. You cannot continue to have fungible personal wealth without corruption. It doesn’t even work on a hypothetical philosophical level.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, literally 99.999% of products you buy in 2026 fund right wing fascism, and most of it you can’t escape because they own the entire supply chain.

      Ain’t capitalism fun?

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I found OVPN to be basically the same thing. They’ve actually proven in court that they have no way of logging customer activity.

  • gapa@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The Örebro Party leader is a communist. So not quite far right. And they don’t even have a party program right now. They are still working on it for the 2026 election.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      that’s what i thought, then i read what they actually want from an interview allard did in 2022. he’s basically invented a new class he calls the “transferiat”, which he claims is the main leech on society. the members of this class? public servants, journalists, and people on social security (allard even specifies “immigrants” there). he wants to get rid of this class, in order to achieve smaller government, “higher quality” reporting, and fewer welfare queens.

      that’s a textbook right-conservative agenda.

    • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      yes, karl marx famously wrote about the deportation of migrants in his book “mein kampf”

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          Allard har sedan bildandet av partiet allt mer tagit avstånd från den svenska vänstern, då han menar att den avlägsnat sig från arbetarrörelsens ursprungliga ideal. Han har istället beskrivit sin ideologiska hemvist som populism och nationalism på marxistisk grund, vilket han menar inte går att placera in på den moderna vänster–höger-skalan.

          Mellan 2022 och 2025 medverkade Allard på den av Sverigedemokraterna grundade mediekanalen Riks. Det första avsnittet av programmet med namnet “Allard” hade premiär 5 november 2022. Fokus var att diskutera dagsaktuella samhällsfrågor och intervjuer med andra samhällsdebattörer.

          He himself claims that you can’t really place their politics on the scale, because he picks ideas from both sides. Yeah, their politics are messy, but they have very fascist and white-supremacist overtones, and they gladly work with nazis. So I don’t personally care for trivial bickering about definitions here.

          Dude basically read Ayn Rand and thought “whoa yeah, that’s the shit”, when in actuality it’s just shit.

          Honestly, it’s like when right-wingers want everything privatised and scream that taxation is theft, but they’re totally happy with having taxes pay for their stuff. Just because they like to benefit from socialist policies doesn’t mean that they’re socialists.

        • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          yeah and the nazis named themselves national socialists so i dont see your point

          • gapa@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Why do you even bother when you don’t know anything about the party? The leader was kicked out of the youth part of the most leftist party in the parliament in 2014. And he was kicked out for being too extreme left (he had supported the Revolutionary Front). And he started a pod with a guy who had also been kicked out for the same reason.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Front_(Sweden)

            • svullo56@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Well. Its well known they have some left options and a lot of far right opinions. Doesn’t matter if he once identified as a extreme leftist. He is now supporting way more far right opinions. It’s just facts. Do as you want with the facts.

            • HorseFD@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              What’s your argument here exactly? That having once held left wing views means all future positions can’t possibly be right wing despite all evidence to the contrary?

    • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And users have the choice to not fund his ability to do so in the future by finding a different place to spend their money.

      Vote with your wallet is something not everyone believes in anymore, but at the same time, this doesn’t really have anything to do with the company’s values. It’s a simple equation. Giving the company money means this guy receives money. So people want to stop giving him money by proxy.

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And everybody else has the freedom to not support him or his business. So, a win win for freedom then.

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Customers also have the freedom to divest from his product as a direct consequence of his political activism, which many are doing.

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        On top of that, the far-left doesn’t exist. All who protest against capitalism and the fascist elite, all those that support social liberation, are comrades and allies of liberty.

    • frischkaesbagett@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Is that guy funding the far-left in the room with you right now? He seems to play an important roll for you.

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        How is the Mullvad guy far right? I thought the Örebro Party was a Marxist party focused on expanding socialized services, like expanding healthcare, reducing costs for public transport, shortening the work week while keeping full pay, etc.

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They are a confusing mix or far left and far right ideas and are a person cult around Allard that came from the left but has bridged the horse shoe and gone xenophobic totalitarian nationalist.

          • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Like, he has his own bodyguards or security agency?

            (My understanding is it’s a local political party that operates in one town.)

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 minute ago

              Like, he has his own bodyguards or security agency?

              Very few politicians here have that. No idea if he does, but it doesn’t seem likely.

              They are a local political party operating out of the town Örebro, they have some regional seats in the region that’s also called Örebro.

              Local and regional politics is still important though. Having fascists diddle around with that is bad news.