Loooooseeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrs! Demanding fiscal accountability. HA!

The very idea!

You know this already but your company management are morons.

‘At some point you’ve got to make money’

Hey hey hey, now, that’s loser talk. Here, c’mon, let’s snort a ton of coke.

For those that didn’t see the article from yesterday, the relevant rule that they refused to waive was the one that said a company must be profitable.

lol

Au contraire!

https://lemmy.world/c/superbowl

The Securities and Exchange Commission filing comes after GoPro has already shared that it is considering a potential sale, news that followed a a $93.5 million net loss for 2025 and $432.3 million in 2024.

Psst. Your management is atrocious.

Maybe that guy in the black leather jacket can pay for everybody’s credits. Y’know, extend and embrace the grift.

That’s why I rely on Lemmy for my information about . . . um . . about . . .

Well. Owls. I guess.

And dull things.

💪

Don’t stick your thing in it!!

Remember Wally? Ooof. I mean, kind of a jerk and all but. What a way to go.

Great Scott!

And why not? The platform has been running flawlessly for years now. Those ‘hu-mans’ are basically cruft now.

Came to comment the same.

Getting in touch with Creative was a frustrating process.

They do not have any security contacts. In fact, I wasn’t even able to find regular contacts that wasn’t just a support form on their website. I tried (two times) to get in contact with them via the web form before giving up and contacting SingCERT to act as an intermediary, hoping they would have better luck reaching Creative.

Initially, SingCERT didn’t seem to be able to get in contact with Creative either. It took Creative nearly two months to respond to SingCERT. Unfortunately, their response was that “they do not consider this to be a vulnerability, as it does not present a cybersecurity risk”. I don’t know how they reached this conclusion, but it became clear that Creative had no interest in responding to or addressing this issue.

That and it has a microphone built in.

Know your place, trash!

-Special Agent Generalissimo Larry Ellison, OBE, Secretary of Cool Shit, ret.

When printed guns are outlawed, something something

Assembly Bill 2047, the California Firearm Printing Prevention Act, passed the state Assembly by 58 votes to 19 and has moved to the Senate.

Uh oh! Sounds like somebody could use a few more giant lines of cocaaaaiiiiiine!!

The saga has drawn speculation from other experts, like William Dormann from Tharros, who said that “MSRC used to be quite excellent to work with. But to save money, Microsoft fired the skilled people, leaving flowchart followers. I wouldn’t be surprised if Microsoft closed the case after the reporter refused to submit a video of the exploit, since that’s apparently an MSRC requirement now.”

. . . In this day and age, when AI-powered security research has arguably made the standard 90-day disclosure-to-patch window completely obsolete, and both time-until-exploit and unused exploits are both nearing zero, Microsoft and other software players would do well to adjust their policies.

That’s such an insane aside. 90-day disclosure-to-patch. Craziness.

On the other hand, this is exactly the way microsoft has been for - easily - 30 years. Like, 1996 microsoft could be slotted into today and literally nothing would change. Other than Nadella would probably be on a bunch of coke.

“Critics”

Very cool idea! Going with the Coyote theme maybe name it Wile E?