cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/48806122

A license verification certificate expires and when it expires, Microsoft Office for Mac assumes it’s unlicensed even if it has been fully paid for.

So, any idiot who paid for Office 2019 for Mac “perpetual” will lose access to it next month.

The same will happen with Office 2021 and Office 2024 in the future.

Pirates are unaffected, only who paid for the product gets punished

Good job 👍🏻

  • worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    While people are piling on Microsoft, I have had issues with older software needing workarounds for certificates. Especially on the Mac OsX.

    How is this anything other than a basic security cert issue?

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Rossman posted a video a while ago about how Microsoft updated their site without noting they updated it to gaslight their customers into thinking it’s always said that.

    There’s a reason these companies are trying to kill the archive sites, it lets people call them on their bullshit.

    Edit: YouTube source

  • Dvixen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not surprised in the least. It’s all about maintaining incoming cash flow.

    They cancelled my Win11 (from purchased Win10 eligible upgrade) key earlier this year when I replaced a failed motherboard.

    Happy to be free of their ecosystem. Should have jumped free long ago.

  • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    OOP’s comment on the original post that the cross-poster should have shared:

    Disclaimer: I wrote “idiot” to describe someone who paid for the product not because they’re actually idiots, but it’s because Microsoft is treating them like that: their official solution on the website is “simply subscribe to the latest and greatest or buy a new “perpetual” license to office 2024 to continue using what you paid for”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m not sure I’m cool with calling people ‘idiots’ in this scenario. We don’t blame the victims of con men when they’re stolen from, and this is the same thing, just on a bigger scale.

    That said, here is the obligatory linking to LibreOffice: https://www.libreoffice.org/

    It’s free and a better choice.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      We need to quit focusing on stuff like this. If somebody calls you a fucking idiot so fucking what?

      And we do blame the victims constantly. The people that blame the victims do nothing but fucking win.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I read it as someone kinda being a dick, but it’s the Internet. Meaning isn’t always well-conveyed electronically. That’s why we have the sarcasm tag.

        • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Had you gone as far as the article you would have seen the disclaimer that makes it clear it’s sarcasm.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I did.

            The title of the article is ‘Microsoft is disabling Office 2019 for Mac next month’, which makes it pretty clear that the editorializing of the title here on Lemmy was intended to be a bit dickish, at least to me.

            If I am wrong, cool, but it’s not because I didn’t look at the article.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not even worth pirating when there are better open source alternatives.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Seem to have worked for this fucking shitty ass president. And his shitty ass fucking party. And I’ll be honest it seems to work for every major corporation.

      The victim blaming definitely works, Just ask anybody who was raped.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Since the OP specifies Mac users, as a Mac user, I find iWork perfectly serviceable. I think it’s a bit controversial with its “Ribbon” on the right rather than the top, though it kind of makes sense. I don’t love iWork (Writer, Numbers, and Keynote), but they are good and they come with Macs (or at the very least are free in the App Store).

      I have tried LibreOffice recently, and I didn’t care for it. But I am glad that such a robust free office suite is available on Windows. I believe some Linux distros ship with it, too. If I didn’t have iWork, I’d probably just use LibreOffice. It’s not terrible, I just have a better choice.

      • teohhanhui@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        a robust free office suite

        The few times I tried using LibreOffice, it’s anything but robust. Very bad UX, and even worse, it frequently crashes and fails to recover, resulting in data loss. And I’ve only been using Linux for more than 10 years now.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s been quite a while since I used iWork, but iWork is different than office. In some ways it’s a better product - the layout and formatting in Pages is worlds ahead of Word. It’s not a clone of the Office suite, which works to its advantage.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Is iWork compatible with Office files though? That’s going to be the sticking point for people who had been using it and lost access…

    • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      ^ This. Easy to get, easy to install, works like a charm and the license is “perpetual” you won’t need bother with it ever again.

    • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The last Mac I put this on was determined not to let me change doc files to open with it no matter what I did. It would change it for individual files only, but not the file type. Maybe because it was m1 or something.

  • Epzillon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Victim-blaming is the real stupidity here. Microsoft harasses its customers (again) and now the customers are the idiots?

    This is the same type of propaganda Nvidia is trying to push. Jensen Huang saying “people should have planned better, the rising prices of hardware was imminent” is the exact same tactic of being the cause of the problem and still putting the blame of everyone else.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, you’re not wrong, but who the heck buys a “perpetual” license for a Microsoft product unless it’s for a company? And especially why pay for stupid boost water office if you could have libre for free?

      If it’s not stupidity then at least ignorance. Doesn’t mean Microsoft is an arse for doing that.

      • Taasz/Woof@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        who the heck buys a “perpetual” license for a Microsoft product

        Office used to always be a perpetual license, so nearly average person that needed an office suite bought one.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Doesn’t change my point. Why pay for it? Either just use it for free or get libreoffice. If I pay a thing from a corpo like MS, behavior like that is totally to be expected. Why even be surprised?

      • Epzillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Idk what reason youd have to buy that and its honestly irrelevant. Just because a company is known for being shit doesnt mean we should just accept it and start calling people stupid when they get fucked over.

        “Oh you decided to get treatment from USA Medicality Corp. Inc. and they killed you and your entire family. Damn youre such an idiot theyve been killing families for years!” is a bad take if you ask me. The company should be held liable for their actions.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I never paid for a single Microsoft product.

          I get your point but why is ignorance to be accepted but corpo behavior isn’t? I mean sure, fuck MS for that, but who is really surprised by a US-company enshittifying their already bad crap? Can only be people who don’t really know what they’re doing there. Which is ignorance.

          Your example kinda lacks in the regard that everyone needs insurance but noone needs Microsoft office. Otherwise same point (assuming there’d be a good free healthcare alternative): if you died because you’re ignorant to the things that matter in this world, and you refused to educate or inform yourself beforehand… Well?

          If I leave my front door wide open, I can’t be surprised when someone comes in and robs me blind. Just because I don’t know burglaries exist.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Not sure why they’re idiots, trying to go the non-sub option is smart, doesn’t vote for subs. Microsoft is the asshole here.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not sure why OP is sitting here tanking these hits, but I don’t think OP meant to call people who bought perpetual licenses to Office idiots. I think they’re saying that Microsoft thinks they’re idiots. Still, OP should have clarified that or at least answered at least one person who asked.

      • wols@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Because it’s a repost.
        If you go to the original, OP actually has the top comment explaining exactly that: “idiots” refers to MS treating their customers as such, not a judgement by OP.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Idiots?

    I’m not one of them, but what makes them idiots? Seems kind of uncalled for.

      • mspencer712@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Agreed. I don’t know if this is the term for it, but I’ve been thinking of all this as “signaling disrespect,” a deliberate attempt to make people think of their peers as lesser, as other.

        I feel like either people have been conditioned to do this online all the time for some reason, or maybe there’s some directed attack against civility. I don’t know. But I refuse to let myself be affected by it. I won’t hate people.

    • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s what I’m thinking

      I bought the win version, because I have a five year old win 10 computer I’m using until win 10 is no longer supported, and I can’t get office for free anymore.

      When win 10 is no longer supported, that’s a Linux computer.

      Would I be an idiot, if they cancelled support for mine? I guess so. I’m waiting for some edgelord to tell me I am, probably accompanied by y0u sH00d jUsT g0 LinUx n0w

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, no rush.

        Come on over to the Linux side when it suits you. You’re welcome to the family when you’re ready and that computer is ready. 🤟

        • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Certainly will be, this is definitely the last windows I’m running. Cheers.

          It was my sons school computer and it’s running education which for win 10 I have been happy with. One son has ditched win 11 and is running Bazzite now. The other is wound back to win 10 I think, but he’ll move

          I’m in the process of deciding which distro to move on; I manage my sons NDIS so that’s front and centre; security of federal government records and claims.

          • KryptonBlur@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Unless you have a specific use case in mind, or have a particular distribution that interests you, I can wholeheartedly recommend Fedora (GNOME or KDE version, either is good). I’ve not had any issues with it for a few years (I think I had some trouble with it in 2022, but nothing since then).

            • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Thank you, not exactly no, just stable and secure.

              I don’t game on it, just book keeping and I do a bit of correspondence. But yeah I need security because the federal government require me to keep records and I make claims through their portal. That’s particularly important now that what I’ve been doing for the last five years will soon become federal law.

              The other thing is I’m not fond of allowing the American tech giants access to those parts of my records. Fortunately excel isn’t required for it. At this time the only American tech involved with it is MS.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        A: gets scammed by company

        B: You’re so stupid, you should have known that company was going to scam you.

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          As if Microsoft was founded just yesterday and wasn’t scamming everyone at everything for like decades, right?

          • accideath@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            12 hours ago

            They don’t have a history of undoing perpetual licenses though. I mean, I know people who still use a licensed copy of office 2000

            • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Now they have. The point is, if you trust that company for whatever reason, it’s your problem. What makes you believe they’re to be trusted? That they changed? There’s nothing that indicates that, yet people keep not just using their unprofessional incompetent code glued stack, they pay money for it.

              • accideath@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Oftentimes it’s not a choice. Microsoft office is a de facto standard in many professional contexts.
                I personally avoid using Microsoft products whenever I can but that doesn’t mean everybody has that luxury.

                And I cannot blame anyone buying a perpetual licence when the alternative is a subscription.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I’m not defending this action from Microsoft, but for most people, they buy a Microsoft product and then happily use it for years, none the wiser to any of Microsoft’s other nonsense happening in the background.

            • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Coming from a background where software is usually pirated and not paid for (which I don’t support now), it’s a special kind of weird to pay for that shite. I mean, who could have guessed? Me personally, I have no empathy for those. Go buy the next license from Microsoft, I guess. Till they screw you again.

              If you pay for something, pay for quality. I understand people who buy Apple stuff, it’s not even overpriced when you consider all the factors. Windows people are fooling themselves, and it’s really fun to watch. ‘Idiots’ is the right word in my book. So I vibe with the title, it’s more correct than the Verge’s one.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Not saying that I agree with the title, just explaining what I think was the reason.

          Although one could say that trusting microslop to keep their word after what we’ve seen them do in the last years is… foolish to say the least.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m not one of them, but what makes them idiots? Seems kind of uncalled for.

      It’s obviously a play on the common phrase that the honest guy ends up being the idiot. Not because the honest guy is stupid but because the honesty ends up backfiring. It’s used all the time in video game DRM contexts.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It was obviously not obvious to me, but okay. I’ll take your word for it. 🙃

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Anyone who pays to install software from a spyware company is incredibly naive to say the least

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Must be like the vast majority of everyone alive that uses some kind of tech these days, then. 🤷‍♂️ I just felt like the title is over the top a little bit. If it had been in a comment it would’ve made me react less for some reason. 😄

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I get it. You’re absolutely right it doesn’t make them idiots. Even I’m being hyperbolic to an extent. The real issue is much bigger and doesn’t stop at Microsoft. I get why people feel so powerless and end up going along with the status quo. Really, the fact that we’ve allowed it is more of a reflection on our collective Idiocracy.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s only morning here but I feel like this comment is the best interaction online I’m gonna have today.

            Great response. And not because you agree with me but because it was even way more insightful than what I said.

            Have a good one, friend. 🫶

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’d argue trying to avoid yet another subscription by paying upfront was an honest and good faith strategy. The problem was assuming Microsoft also acts in good faith, and wouldn’t just take the money and run like they have just 7 years in.

    Honestly for things like this, I would struggle to be convinced that these folks aren’t entirely within their right to take back what they already bought in good faith by pirating it.