• tatterdemalion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nerd question: My English brain reads “happy little accident” and “big angry intent” as the correct ordering of adjectives for both phrases. But semantically, the adjectives are actually swapped in order (big and little are not in the same position). What is going on?

    • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think its to do with the subject of the sentence.

      The subject of sentence 1 is happy accidents, and he is describing it as a ‘happy’ accident because its turned out in a pleasant way, as opposed to something like “frustrating little accident”.

      Sentence 2 the subject is angry intent, like he is behaving in a way that is focused by angry emotion, and in this case ‘big’ is the modifier that is giving you a scale of how intense the emotion is.

      Note: I am in no way an english or language authority, just how i think my brain is handling the structure of those sentences and the order that feels ‘right’.

  • gon [he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Huh. This reminds me of that thing with English adjective order.

    It’s Happy Little Accidents, but Big Angry Intent. Are Happy and Angry not in the same category of adjective?

    • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I thought the same thing. It seems like the commonly accepted order (Opinion, Size, Age, Shape, Color, Origin, Material, and Purpose) doesn’t include emotion, so that might be what makes it ambiguous.

      Or it might be the meaning behind the words - when Bob Ross says “happy little accidents”, he’s not saying the accidents are happy but that they’re a good thing, so this is more like an opinion, while “big angry intents” sounds more like the intents are themselves angry.

      • gon [he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Hmmm… I think there’s something there in what you said… It does seem more like “he’s happy about the little accidents”, while “the angry intents are big”. Weird!

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It kinda means (to me, a layman) that the accidentals are little but the angry is big

  • BigBrownDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The Joy of Killing with Bob Ross.

    “The rivers will run Cadmium Red with my enemies’ blood.”

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Right there, on that one, let’s add Odin and a few screaming Valkyries riding forth from Asgard to rain wrath and ruin upon the nations of the White Christ.

  • Ariselas@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Bob’s not so well known spinoff “The Agony of Abstract Expressionist Painting”

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Don’t make me angry. You don’t want to see me when I’m angry.” - Fred Rogers

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    We want happy paintings, if you want sad things… I’m about to go on a happy little spree