• magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    Scam Altman: “Oh no - the bots are 2 good. Gaze into my black hole pls”

    Scam Altman: Literally gave birth to the bot technology.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      I’m not sure I’d give him the #1 position. Definitely up there, but not quite at the top. Or maybe several megagrifters should share the throne.

  • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How about you just restrict ticket sales to 1-2 per person and require it to be tied to a name on sale which is verified on use and cannot be easily changed? That’s all you need to do.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Weird how so many techbro ideas boil down to registering your identification with the tech oligarchs…

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      I can’t think of anyone I would rather give unalterable biometric information to than a group of egomaniacal sadists who have shown utter disregard for the privacy of everyone as well as the legal code.

  • PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    (1) Offer a solution which exacerbates bot-traffic on the internet, (2) legitimize the need for verification of users as a result, (3) offer the most privacy-invasive “solution” to the “problem” imaginable: problem(1)-reaction(2)-solution(3)… every parasite’s favorite paradigm :)

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Because you can hand someone else proof of purchase. The only way to truly prevent scalping is by verifying the purchaser’s identity, to ensure they cannot transfer it to anyone else. At least not without selling it through the distributor’s own channels where they will then collect a fee for the privilege of providing the proprietary platform to facilitate such transactions.

      I’ll take the scalping, thanks.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It achieves invading customer privacy.

      Oh, and selling a lot of their scanner-ball hardware things. Because now anybody who ever buys tickets to any concert or any other live event will now also need to buy one of those little fuckers.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What a relief. As long as we are all tracked at all times by both government and corporations, we can finally be free of the burden of ticket scalping. It’s a small price to pay for this great reward. I think we can turn our attention toward solving other oppressive plagues like Jay walking and double parking now.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They thought wrong.

    This dumbass idea assumes a single person and NOT a group of people are responsible for scalping tickets, when in actuality this will just drive up scalping prices.

    You fucking morons.