• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 hour ago

    What’s the play here? Something isn’t making sense.

    With the Trump administration, the only thing you can be sure of is that the stated reason isn’t the real reason. Somebody’s got to be getting a payday from this.

    • Bieren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      It’s a money grab. About the only networking companies that build in the us are like Cisco and juniper. Which odds are, you aren’t running at home. This is without a doubt a money grab. Google and Amazon will gladly pay the exemption fee. Some others will as well. This isn’t about security or “pay American”. It’s a money grab.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Same play as always. Bullies countries and corps to get what he wants. As long as it serves him that’s all he cares about.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      There will be some meetings with oems, and gold things dropped on his desk, and the exceptions will start being handed out. Same as always.

  • nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    From another article about this topic:

    This leads to the question of what exactly the FCC means by consumer-grade routers.

    In September 2024, NIST submitted proposals to strengthen the – undeniably modest – IT security of routers (NIST IR 8425A). It states: “Routers forward data packets, most commonly Internet Protocol (IP) packets, between networked systems.”

    This encompasses a wide range of devices, from WLAN repeaters to smartphones

    So new smartphones are banned too?

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I upgraded mine last year. Went from a core 2 duo with 4gig of ram to a fifth generation I5 with 16 gig of ram. Installed pfblockerNG and now I don’t need any other device to have a decent filter.

  • garbage_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    People here: “Hahha, I’m so smart, I’m going to flash openwrt/opnsense and use whatever PC as a router”

    They want you to do that. This law exists for a reason, to decrease use of foreign proprietary, potentially unsafe software in critical infrastructure.

    By using openwrt you’re doing what lawmakers want you to do.

  • Antaeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Cisco is made in China. Ubiquiti, Vietnam or Thailand I think.

    How is this going to work?

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don’t, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

      We’ve seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Smuggling? Setting up a factory in Florida that reboxes routers and slaps “Made In America” stickers on them? Resale/referb router prices going through the roof?

      Take your pick.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    All the thrift stores here throw them away. I’ve got dozens of them, variety of all types piled up in the closet because why the fuck the not? Fucking knew they’d come after them eventually.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      On Linux you can just turn the kernel into a router with a few commands. Its actually very cool.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For anyone looking into this, I recommend picking up a “network appliance” PC. They’re low-spec, often fanless, and come with 4 Ethernet ports. You can often get them for roughly the same price as a router. You will need to provide your own WiFi AP with this method.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think you guy are forgetting Occam Razor… the most likely scenario (least assumptions) here is that some inept appointee from the orange pedo thought this would be a good idea and pushed it with the research, planning and preparation we all put at farting after eating Taco Bell

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s a line about “… unless they have a waiver.”

      That’s the razor, it’s gatekeeping for who can get your special permit.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    designating all consumer routers manufactured outside the U.S. as a security risk

    So this is horseshit, right?

    First of all, ALL routers from ANY country are a security risk? Every single other nation is trying to make Spyware for the average American consumer? Doubt.

    Second, they are extremely concerned with all consumers’ security from foreign actors to the point it needs an outright ban on hardware to protect us. God forbid I buy an AVM router from Germany and open up my home networking to German Spies. What if they find out I sometimes visit porn websites and yourube!?

    Third, that the US government, themselves, are trustworthy and wont force backdoors into systems to allow them unfettered access into private networks, something that they HAVE TRIED TO AND SUCCEEDED TO DO IN THE PAST. And also something that they are very clearly opening the door for with all of these legal pushes toward requiring age verification software and OS’s. They want to ban foreign routers so that you have to buy routers from companies that they can control. They can ask, coerce and force them to give them access behind the scenes for some bullshit excuse (“protect the kiddies”, “law enforcement”, “national security”, “terrorism”), force them to not tell the public, and then “secretly” monitor every device in the entire country. They are almost certainly already doing this with a significant number of US manufacturers and software developers.

    Fuck these fascists.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I find it unlikely to be about security. Either it is about control or about money (pressure to induce bribery for lifting), or a combination of both.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is entirely true that all models from all manufacturers are compromised by spy agencies. However the worst offender by far is Cisco even though they’re “American”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It is entirely true that all models from all manufacturers are compromised by spy agencies.

        I think there’s a little bit of space between “spy agencies employ systems professionals that know the guts of a component’s security and tricks to bypass it” and “every device firmware has a double super secret protocol for sidestepping all of its security features”.

        However the worst offender by far is Cisco even though they’re “American”.

        Sure. I’m willing to believe that Cisco, specifically, has relationships with the Five Eyes network such that they make monitoring their traffic easier. Even then, there’s limits. One thing to say techniques exist to bypass security. Another entirely to know what those techniques are and whether they’re practical for application at universal scale.

        One of the more chronic problems that big spy agencies have is sifting through all the spam and bullshit and empty chatter. Decryption takes time. And you can’t monitor everything, everywhere, all at once. The bigger sins of Cisco are in how they expedite access on behalf of their agency partners, not that they fail to produce perfectly hack-proof hardware.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Figures, make it difficult and expensive for consumers to get routers. Make it so people must pay 5 times as much for a lower quality “US made” router in 4-5 years once the factories are built; or people just stop using the internet at home like the administration wants.

    The US does not make many electronics, and when we do, they are ALWAYS made with imported components. So this is once again a threat to companies to move production to the US, but with ZERO incentive for the companies to do so.

    No wonder our economy is tanking so hard under these nazi’s. They are so incompetent, it hurts.

    • ExoticCherryPigeon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You would need an expansion module or two… or how many wires you need… I am sitting on on a 16 slot switch… and thinking I might need more…