According to Taiwan tech publication DigiTimes, most AI firms are unwilling to wait two years for HDD supplies to stabilize and are shifting to SSDs instead. To contain costs, they are choosing QLC NAND-based drives over the faster, more durable, and more expensive TLC variants.
Back to punch cards we go. Or are they hoarding paper too?
“Why does the population hate us? We’re only completely destroying the consumer electronics market, accelerating climate change, aiming to eliminate countless jobs, increasing power costs, and stealing the works of millions of people to feed our system all so we can get even more obscenely wealthy? Please clap.”
You forgot to mention that the product they’re sacrificing everything for is widely failing to meet expectations and that they will likely expect taxpayers to bail them out when their investments fail and threaten to take out the entire economy with themselves
To be clear, it only wildly fails to meet expectations in sectors that you hear about.
It’s most definitely medium expectations in sectors you don’t hear about because news and social media have a huge negativity bias because that gets views and engagement.
If we want to fight this scourge, we need to be more informed about it.
Like what sectors?
Law enforcement and military
Doesn’t seem to be meeting expectations in that sector either.
I certainly expect that the visual models are meeting expectations in the racial profiling department.
I am start to think they are going on the acceleroism theory to push the society to the limits and destroy all for change
Some think this could lead to a more equallytary society, some wants to make a more centralized and controlled by one power sort of society, there is 2 different school of thought on this.
But we are clearly going to have big changes
Are now? Haven’t they been using flash first?
Hard drives suck for that work load. Their seek times are huge, their throughput is awful, and they’re worse storage density than HDDs. You can fit 24 2.5" ssds into a 2u server. 16TB in a 2.5" > 24TB in 3.5" SSDs were first to skyrocket in price vs HDDs.
No. AI companies have huge storage requirements for training data. Flash storage is not cost efficient for mass storage quantities.
For massive companies space is as costly as the price of the storage. Especially these AI companies don’t care much about the price of things.
Something tells me you’ve never worked for a massive company.
These aren’t massive companies. They’re startups. (and some branches inside of massive companies acting like startups)
A"I" companies want to store petabytes of “good” training data
On the upside, we consumers get to have the superior TLC SSDs (better write durability).
Assuming that the chip manufacturers don’t drop TLC production to fill AI orders.
Compared to microns?
