You worded it better than I would ever have.

Oh I get it now.
Also, for some reason setting vi as $EDITOR, it is not able to load the contents of the file, unlike vim that does.

Well, when I can just do $EDITOR file…

Any specific reason for the 2 separate engines?
What’s the advantage?

All I can think of is that you might be running a much lower powered, single engine when not in 4WD mode.

A Gnoming wheel?

That blue dot is like quantum fluctuations.
Except that quantum fluctuations only have enough of a chance to get bigger when in a void.

That’s it!
Been so many years since I last read/heard that word that all I could recall was “stillets”, which is not a word and looking it up only got me to “stilettos”.

Unless you are someone exceptionally good at walking with long leg-sticks (I don’t know the appropriate name for that) and have someone to make an over-engineered leg-stick for this purpose.

Usually, I assume darker blue to be deeper waters.

I am not sure which point you are answering to.
COuld you please specify.

I have been suggested alternative programs to install to work with Ctrl+r, which are supposed to work better, but I just end up using kwrite ~/.bash_history when Ctrl+r fails.

Yeah, it does tend to be hard to determine when to use () {} [] etc.
Even after I RTFM and used those in scripts multiple times, I tend to forget it by the time I need to implement something next.

In case of Arch, for bash, you have the bash-completions package, apart from which some program packages install their own bash completions.
Then there is also zsh-completions for zsh.

I remember having to install them separately, but maybe you know some package group that did it for you.

Another point is, the reason Google’s AI is able to identify CSAM is because it has that in its training data, flagged as such.

In that case, it would have detected the training material as ~100% match.

I don’t get though, how it ended up being openly available as if it were properly tagged, they would probably exclude it from the open-sourced data. And now I see it would also not be viable to have an open-source, openly scrutinisable AI deployment for CSAM detection for the same reason.

And while some governmental body got a lot of backlash for trying to implement such an AI thing on chat stuff, Google gets to do so all it wants because it’s E-Mail/GDrive and all on their servers and you can’t expect privacy.

Considering how many such stories of people having problems due to this system is coming up, is there any statistic of legitimate catches using this model? I suspect not, because why would anyone use Google services for this kind of stuff?

The abbreviation sounds like some kind of exotic Surface to Air Missile lol

It does.
Somehow acronyms just end up sounding cool. Guess we should just use the full form. That would be better.

The poo dropped right on someone’s car.

I think mortn is unable to relate to the outcome (of giving horses radiation poisoning) being desirable.
Kinda similar to people who can’t get the Joker’s desire to “See the world burn”, which is why they don’t understand his jokes.

And here I was considering petitioning for an open source UPI app.
Turns out, the Government is just another company now.

I feel like they’d be happy installing yet another spying app, if that means getting to keep millions of data providers.

Make sure to get her id first. You can then send her a SIGSEGVto get her dumped and then use coredumpctl to recover her dump.
Even better if her debug symbols are available.