I tried visualising 4 dimensions once or twice, but it doesn’t really work out for me.
So I have no way to get that 4th axis for the 4th ring.

It’s extremely easy upto the 2 rings and I am also able to change the axes while moving them.
The moment I add a 3rd ring, the difficulty seems to abruptly increase, making me take quite a while to imagine it and even the slightest diversion, making me forget the simulation.

I just realised that in your explanation, you didn’t explicitly require orthogonal axes. Now it makes more sense to try the 4th ring. Perhaps I will try doing that when I am about to sleep, after doing the 3 rings for a while and see if I am able to do so.
There is a way to cheat yourself out of this, by first making the animation and watching it on a screen and then internalising it. I will keep that for later, after knowing how well I can do without it.

I also feel the need to say that while in my above description, I am able to do something similar to visualisation, that doesn’t really help me in drawing stuff. Even when I try using a 3D CAD program, that way of visualisation ends up making it harder for me to make it. Instead, I need to force myself to reduce the extra information of touch and feel and taste, to make it easier for me to model it and it takes further effort to make a 2D projection.

I am not on this scale.

How to draw an apple in the mind?

• Start with the seed. It’s full of some stuff and feels solid.
• Cover the seed with a rigid, plasticky smooth membrane. It has not particular taste.
• Stick a lot of mushy watery stuff to the membrane and go outwards.
• At some point, there’s a twig starting to form and goes outward
• Shape the mush
• Cover it with another membrane that’s now, a little less rigid and feels different.

Colour? What colour?
That’s extra charge.

Some people set-up their mobile phones as temporarily-permanent hotspots.
And then there was this mobile hotspot that used USB.

It’s a one time use melee weapon.
Keep your expectations low.

Mostly Mass Effect fans back then, I suppose.

I myself considered the idea kinda fun, with the cool graphics it was portrayed with, in the game trailers.
Even though I never ended up playing the game, that was probably one of the things that caused me to give a try to Google Assistant for a few hours, before I realised how it just wasn’t worth it.

And now they’ve got stuff with extremely high price/performance ratio, expecting people to find it desirable just because it is “fluent”.
I have enough experience listening to people who fluently speak information that they understand nothing of and don’t need a machine to do the same, just because it has a bigger dump of information and lower rational capabilities.

So how do they manage it when I run up the stairs faster than what an elevator could?
Do they just have waste an expensive stasis charge for every floor and that is why they don’t like me using the stairs?

The three-martini lunch is no longer common practice for several reasons; these include the implementation of “fitness for duty” programs by numerous companies, the decreased tolerance of alcohol use,[4] a general decrease in available leisure time for business executives and an increase in the size of the martini

I would love to see a whole AI data-centre and its accompanying nuclear power plant get arrested.

Yeah, doesn’t seem worth using AI to me.

I can manually program that much in an hour.

People desired Cortana in their devices.
Until they found out what it is being made out of.

No need to unionise when you have the power to make a startup.

But then first you need the power and ability to make a startup.

Yeah, so you see, they just don’t know that the stuff is available.
They are also the types to download from stuff like Softonic/MegaUpload etc. when the official website has downloads available, so even if the website were to advertise Linux availability, they would never end up seeing it.

I saw it in multiple cartoons, hundreds of times.
Must be legit, that’s peer reviewed and perfectly reproduced.

Well of course, there’s probably other Windows stuff they are also using, considering how much they aren’t even trying to ship for something like Ubuntu, which would be super easy otherwise.

I can only imagine how big of a push Autodesk can easily put towards Linux. That would easily make the current rise to 5% be nothing in comparison. Maybe MS is paying them too, to keep them together.
Of course it might also just be that MS makes it easier for them to setup a DRM (Digital Rights Management) as compared to Linux, not that it matters considering how much they have been pirated.

Then there was this person who was not using Linux because of the CAD software he wanted to use and when I asked what exactly it was, he said, “KiCad”^[1].

Yeah, I didn’t understand why people were going around talking about toothpicks when there is a thingy specifically made for the job.
To use a toothpick, I would need to go out and buy a pack, while I already have a dozen of them plugs lying around in my house. In fact I got 2 more pieces, complementary with the a handheld mixer, because it had a wall-mount fitment.

Perhaps you could look for an alternate solution?

Who knows, maybe Autodesk will finally start thinking about Linux.
They already use Qt anyway, so the .NET part is all they’d need to fix.

Nah, just the WWW