I appreciate the effort put into this but if answering yes to “are you new to Linux?” leads to the follow up question “apt or rpm?” then there’s a problem.
Several front-ends to RPM ease the process of obtaining and installing RPMs from repositories and help in resolving their dependencies. These include:
yum used in Fedora Linux, CentOS 5 and above, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and above, Scientific Linux, Yellow Dog Linux and Oracle Linux
DNF, introduced in Fedora Linux 18 (default since 22), Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, AlmaLinux 8, and CentOS Linux 8.
up2date used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS 3 and 4, and Oracle Linux
Zypper used in Mer (and thus Sailfish OS), MeeGo,[16] openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise
urpmi used in Mandriva Linux, ROSA Linux and Mageia
apt-rpm, a port of Debian’s Advanced Packaging Tool (APT) used in Ark Linux,[17] PCLinuxOS and ALT Linux
Smart Package Manager, used in Unity Linux, available for many distributions including Fedora Linux.
rpmquery, a command-line utility available in (for example) Red Hat Enterprise Linux
libzypp, for Sailfish OS
Then for dpkg, you can choose from among aptitude, apt, apt-get/apt-query/etc, graphical frontend options like synaptic that one may want to use in parallel with the TUI-based frontends, etc.
Lots of pro-Ubuntu propaganda in those floe charts. At this point, Ubuntu of any flavor shouldn’t be recommended to anyone. There are always better alternatives.
https://piefed.blahaj.zone/post/347408
https://lemmy.ca/post/53099450
I appreciate the effort put into this but if answering yes to “are you new to Linux?” leads to the follow up question “apt or rpm?” then there’s a problem.
Exactly. One is a package format and/or local package utility, and the other is a frontend to do downloads and updates for that local package utility.
Should be “rpm or dpkg” — assuming that we’re excluding the other options — and then if someone chooses RPM, you can start talking about the frontend:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPM_Package_Manager
Then for
dpkg, you can choose from amongaptitude,apt,apt-get/apt-query/etc, graphical frontend options likesynapticthat one may want to use in parallel with the TUI-based frontends, etc.You’ve completely missed the point. If you’re new to Linux you have no clue what those are and shouldn’t care.
Sure, but my point was that someone new to Linux can only answer that question with “what the fuck are those”
I hate myself but I don’t Gentoo hate myself.
gentoo for small computing power?? no offense, but that’s bonkers 😹
I judge distro chooser flowcharts by whether they correctly point me to Slackware. These both pass.
Lots of pro-Ubuntu propaganda in those floe charts. At this point, Ubuntu of any flavor shouldn’t be recommended to anyone. There are always better alternatives.
These are magnificent. Now I can turn off my brain lol.
Redox is UNIX-like, not a BSD flavor. The kernel, init, userland, etc. aren’t BSD related.