• 0 Posts
  • 253 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2023

help-circle




  • You are making an absurd and obtuse argument, my Steam Deck functions out of the box as a normal computer.

    Steam Deck runs SteamOS 3.0, a Linux-based operating system (OS) built on Arch Linux and the KDE Plasma desktop. It’s open source with some closed source components. Here’s a quick overview:

    You are suggesting DIY installing android (eeww) as opposed to hmm… I forgot let me check how I get to the desktop on a vanilla out of the box Steam Deck running Linux.

    Hold down your Steam Deck’s power button, and select “Switch to Desktop.” Wait a few seconds, and that’s it

    Your argument is embarassingly bad, stop spreading lazy narratives when you don’t know what you are talking about.





  • What are you talking about? You can click “go to desktop mode” on your steam deck and it will bring you to a desktop… like a normal computer…

    You can’t do that on a Switch, or if you can you have to be an expert DIYer.

    Don’t insult “casual” users by suggesting an optional desktop view where you can use your Steam Deck like a normal computer is “toooo much for the casual user”. Not it isn’t. The desktop view lets you use any web browser you want, lots of people need to use web browsers, that is only one example of why a “casual” user might use desktop mode on the Steam Deck.

    No you way off the mark here, and so is Nintendo.




  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyztoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldAdobe Creative Curse
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Look you aren’t going to stop this bad thing going on, so why not just support the bad thing going on and stop complaining? Personally I have made a lot of money off this bad thing so I am struggling to see what is bad about it? Your numerous examples about this bad thing hurting other people and the earth don’t work on me since I have spent a long time listening to white guys explain to me how to completely destroy my capacity for empathy for other human beings and now I am functionally a sociopath.

    Besides anyways, all art is stealing so what is wrong with condescendingly shitting on artists and art in general as an idea by drowning spaces that used to be public squares full of vibrant human art with crappy cynical slop generated by a computer?


  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyztoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldAdobe Creative Curse
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I can’t keep getting this whiplash where I lose all faith in humanity and then humanity goes and does something awesome and hilarious like this.

    For those on Bluesky, this is a perfect example of why Bluesky will enshittify since this kind of brutal honesty towards rich people and large corporations won’t be tolerated on a coporate social network that is working to turn as big of a profit as possible.

    This period of people being able to clown on powerful corporations like this will quickly come to an end as soon as investors put the pressure on Bluesky to return a profit.








  • To give a specific example of how powerful Blender is, in geology there are very very very very expensive 3d modelling programs and then there is like… Sketchup which I guess Google hasn’t abandoned? idk… even the basic GIS software for geologic mapping from ESRI is expensive AF, especially if you want to do any fancy 3d rendering or map making.

    Enter this guy

    You already know this guy is cool as fuck just from that photo, but let me tell you how exactly how lowkey cool Marcus Schwander is.

    (btw I have zero connection to this guy, I know next to nothing about him, I literally just found his videos from searching “Blender Geology” on youtube randomly)

    His video series shows quite clearly and exhaustively how to do extremely complicated geologic mapping of complex fold belts with lots of faults using Blender. What I can’t stress enough is that the workflow he is detailing in the proprietary software world would be EXTREMELY niche, require exhaustive licensing and setting up payment and getting software keys… blah blah blah and ultimately it would be a very expensive workflow, possibly requiring software licenses that cost thousands of dollars or more (I am not kidding). On top of the prohibitive cost, any kind of documentation, additional plugin development, or content creators who make tutorials about how to use the tools is an order of magnitude rarer for those tools because access to the tools in the first place is so prohibitive (and is usually only along narrow circumstances, not the kind of situation someone would organically decide to make a youtube tutorial channel about a software that costs $30,000 a license necessarily). In contrast, try searching for “Blender tutorial” in youtube and just take a cursory glance and the absurdly exhaustive amount of resources out there about learning Blender.

    I have been teaching myself Blender because I want to make similar tutorial videos because it is ridiculous to me idea that in 2025 geologists don’t have an open format to visualize geologic structures and map them in a natural 3d environment that can be then shared with other geologists, in a established non-proprietary format that a geologist can ensure that any other geologist can open and view the model/data themselves, because again if you have a computer you can get Blender…

    I am firmly of the belief that Blender should be taught as a basic part of a Geology curriculum along with a GIS class, not a primary focus or anything, but the tool is so general and so broadly useful that I think we owe it to future scientists to teach everybody we can how to use Blender.

    As a last point, I want to emphasize that I am not suggesting using Blender to make cool fancy cinematic visualizations of Geology because it looks cool, or suggesting trying to do lots of complex modelling and computation in Blender instead of a GIS software, those are both awesome uses of Blender but what I am suggesting is that by simply teaching the next generation of Geologists how to use a 3d modelling software just for the simple purposes of giving them a tool to sketch out ideas or explore a geologic map from a 3d perspective (which can be useful ESPECIALLY when talking to other people about specific geologic structures that are difficult to explain without a 3d perspective to point to) Blender is going to forever change how Geologists use computers to do Geology.

    It is a cool moment because on the flip side… there is a LOT of money in Geology and I think the Blender community could and will absolutely find serious, sustainable long term funding from Geology companies and academia associated entities that could massively bolster development capability and funding security.