• finitebanjo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Fuck increased birthrates. I want an earth with 3 Billion or less people, I don’t want any of us to have to kill any of them, and no I don’t care that our shitty forefathers made too many babies who are now elderly assholes ruining the planet: fuck em. Productivity has doubled or tripled since their time, we can handle up to triple the burden until they croak.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nononono, you don’t get it: looking at the past 4+ governments, I think they want to increase the birth rate of the right people.

      I was so naïve back when had I thought the Labour would be any different from the Tories…

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If they wanted to increase the birthrate if already wealthy people they wouldn’t remove the 2 child cap for benefits.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    A) bring back third spaces where people can meet up and socialize without money. Decent wages so people have free time. Unions so people have breaks and rights. Walkable cities where you can run into another person and have a chat without being run over by a car.

    B) authoritarian police state where porn is banned but the government has 10gb of photos of your genitals and sells it to advertisers who send you coupons for diapers when you fuck.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    21 hours ago

    That’s not why they’re doing it, they want to tightly control and track what everyone does, limit their freedoms and so on. But yeah.

    • xxam925@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nah I disagree. They don’t care about anything specific so long as the population of sheep is robust. They need to shear at their leisure.

      They don’t actually care what the sheep do, who the sheep fuck or who fucks the sheep. They are just sheep. There isn’t a moral component at all. It’s a sham to get the sheep signed on.

      Capitalists see themselves as a different species.

      And yes I understand that I am a sheep.

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I only ever saw it as controlling the spread of the horrific and anti-human terrorist philosophy of “believing the mass internment and murder of Palestinians is not a good thing actually”

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Literally hundreds of studies showing that if people can buy a house before they’re 40, they will have more children.

    You can’t legislate your way into a higher birth rate. Even authoritarian countries have tried and failed. But you can legislate systemic changes that help people with housing, childcare, and groceries.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So fuck the youn g generation even harder? You think what? The old which will continue to outnumber them, won’t fuck over the younger generation because they can’t outvote them?

      If the “cycle” breaks, the young get turbo fucked. Either you somehow offload the old dependables or you meet the demand. No one in their right mind wants to cull the elderly.

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Noett suggesting we cull the elderly, but what’s being in our right mind gonna do for us? The enemy is fucking insane, may as well fight fire with fire. Let’s have a left that isn’t passive yeah