Just minutes before it was set to deliver its financial results for the first half of its 2025-26 fiscal year, Ubisoft mashed the brakes on the whole thing, postponing the release of its results to an unspecified future date. The company also requested that European exchange Euronext halt trading of the company’s shares and bonds from November 14 until the publication of its results.

  • dbtng@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    The only games in my Steam library that I can’t play are Ubisoft.
    Fuk Ubi. Forever. I would be happy if they went under.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    They should use prices of $200, 250, and 300 instead of the $70, 110, and 130 AAA reskinned games. That would work. /s

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    All you had to do was make good and fun games. How do you fuck THAT up??? Especially when you were already doing it.

    And not to mention…

    “Hey guys, what can we make that people really want?”

    “I hear people all the time over the last decade asking for a new Splinter Cell game.”

    “Yeah, ok, Brad. We’ll call that plan B… Every year with this asshole. Does anyone have any REAL ideas???”

    Because fuck gamers, right, Ubi? Expedition 33 showed the world what current games makers can do when pricks in suits arent around to muddy the waters. The quicker UBI folds, and all that talent leaves to make something that they actually want to make the better.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      They are also hellbent on infecting everything they touch with Denuvo malware. I haven’t bought anything of theirs in years for that reason alone.

  • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A lot of very confused people here who think an earnings delay means ubi havent made much money. Cant say if they have or not, but if they havent thats still not a reason for this kind of delay

    • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not that, it’s the trade halt that points to something major (and bad for them) happening.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They haven’t been doing too well recently. The trade halt is because they’re afraid that everybody would read the halting of the report as admission they’re barely afloat and start dumping shares, killing the company.

        • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Right, If the truth is theyre barely afloat theyre not going to change anything by delaying the report. The time its reporting has passed.

    • Potatar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Professional (as in they earn money, not skill level) Xers fuck everything up. (here, X is an arbitrary verb or a brand name)

      My anecdotes: Youtube was good before professional youtubers became a thing (systemic problem, people are not the issue but the environment which breeds them), now it’s attention economy and or one topic discussed for 50 minutes (a video explaining the same topic with the same intensity from 10 years ago is 2 minutes long)

      Gamers were problematic but harmless, professional gamers caused betting pandemic (sponsored content).

      Streamers were funny, professional streamers are sexy/deadly-sells-to-children.

      I liked it when people were sharing stuff online because they were bored, and not because they were hungry.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I‘m looking forward to next year when AAA studios will continue to disappoint even harder while indie games flourish and gain market share. Maybe the AI bubble pops too. One can only hope.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Then the AAA studios will use some of their Saudi cash to buy out the most prominent indie developers, only to slowly strangle their products

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      On a pedestrian level, I’ve really liked the slow move from “SNES aesthetic” to “PS1/PS2 aesthetic”. My first console was an N64, so I guess I never had much nostalgia for the 8-bit days, and I feel like 3D gives a lot of opportunities for intelligent asset reuse to give a game lots of content.

  • itkovian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This exactly what happens when you rely on rhetoric, instead of you know, making games that people like.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The Ubisoft trading community are coping to justify holding on to their tanking investments. It’s a gambler doubling down on losing.

    Christ, how the mighty Ubisoft has fallen. They will go the way of EA and become a spyware company for the decadent Arab royals. I’m just crying that Ubisoft made some of my favourite games growing up and look what they have done to my boy-- a rotting zombie 🥲

    • MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s disappointing. I’ve been going through some of their older catalog recently and it just has a lot more passion behind it i feel.

      AC Shadows felt like when i write an essay, where i get really motivated at the start, completely drop off and try to stuff the middle with as much as possible to reach the page count, then get motivated again at the end just to finish the conclusion. They always had their bugs, but lately it’s felt soulless.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ubisoft has been shit for a very long time.

      I still recoil from the memory of Far Cry 3 dropping in the middle of the game because thier launcher had an issue, three times in one hour. Which reset my progress. Uninstall, never bought shit from them again.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There AAA games.

    Then there’s one AAAA game.

    Next must be the AAAAA game they’re working on. It’s an extraction shooter.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sounds like their recent games that they claimed did so well probably didn’t actually, and that’s about to be a massive problem.

    • the_strange@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The most recent release is probably Anno 117 which came out yesterday. While decently looking it’s lacking features of the previous title (like coop mode and mod browser) with the promise they will be added later and is priced at around 60€ or 90€ if you want to gamble on the quality of the promised to be released DLC. They also relied on AI generated images in some of the assets used in the game instead of paying their artists. Optimisation for the game seems to be ok, but not great but it might be too early to judge that fully yet.

        • the_strange@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They tried to build a lot of hype around the game and get people to preorder. Maybe those numbers were (far) below expectations?

      • caut_R@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don‘t get why they’d cheap out on artists, a couple people drawing illustrations is surely not gonna balloon development cost - and arguably one of the easiest places to spot when it‘s AI slop. It‘s as if they think there must be gen AI stuff in the game somewhere or the game‘s worse or something.

        • the_strange@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If you look at the older titles, there’s so much love and passion that went into the artworks. 1404 is 16 years old and has aged incredibly well, because of the high quality of the work that went into it. This is missing in 117.