This isn’t new? This doesn’t have the same activity nor price history SteamDB does? What are you even talking about?
Haha get fucked VCs. Valve making sure that SteamDB buyout money ain’t coming back from their now devalued goods. It’s a shame we lost a good service but nice knowing it went out with a poison pill.
Am I missing something? Hasn’t this always been there?
Good. SteamDB is completely dead being bought by NexusMods.
Who wants to bet the first thing to go will be concurrent user count? Or perhaps I will need to make an account (for data harvesting) or pay a subscription to view the numbers.
SteamDB is completely dead being bought by NexusMods.
Been hearing this a lot, but no one can ever actually explain why, only that ‘nexusmods bad’ but never even why they’re bad.
Is it because they removed bigoted mods?
Is it because they stopped drama queens holding up entire modding scenes with drama?
You got downvoted by morons and bigots.
The claim/fear that Nexus will remove concurrent player counts is literally the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
The real reason NexusMods acquiring SteamDB is concerning is because, as stated in their announcement, they’re dedicating an entire team with more resources to keeping it running. This used to be done by one person + donations. So, ads, sponsors, affiliate schemes, and more anti-user plans are being cooked up to make it sustainable.
It’s a valid concern. Overblown but valid.
To me, it’s a mixture of things:
- I want my hosting sites to not be opinionated, think AO3. Is there shit on it that I wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole? Yes. Is it fine? Also yes.
Removing “bigoted mods” is just saying “we decide what you can download”, and I can make that determination for myself, as a grown ass adult.
-
Their monetisation is shit, and they’re very heavyhanded about it
-
Their user-facing behaviour is smug and condescending, they act like modding exists because of them and not the other way around.
We don’t allow hate speech here, why would it be allowed in mods?
Removing anti-trans mods should not be an issue.
Lemmy is not a hosting site, it’s a forum, it’s fundamentally different.
I disagree with plenty of ideas, but I also reject the notion that someone should be barred from publishing them, because that tool will inevitably be used against those same people when the pendulum swings.
To wit, those mods didn’t stop existing, they were just hosted elsewhere, because a hosting site is not social media, it’s not a place of dialogue or community, it’s a utility, and thus fungible. Gatekeeping it accomplishes nothing.
But there are realistically always some rules on what kinds of hosted content is allowed on a page. Open racism/transphobia are, I’m guessing, not allowed. Why is this a step too far compared to other cases that go beyond legal limits?
It’s also important to note that 1) they weren’t barred from publishing the mod, and 2) they’re totally okay with using said tool in lots of cases where it was never used before - why would they suddenly care about it?
Open racism/transphobia are, I’m guessing, not allowed.
Ok, so you clearly are not familiar with what AO3 is.
The point is: Mods, like fanfiction, or any other form of expression that is to be perused by others at their leisure (unlike social media interaction which is by its very nature meant to address an audience of strangers in a “digital town square” of sorts) are both pointless and wrong to regulate.
The same exact argument of moral turpitude was the whole reason why american gay/lesbian erotica had to end with the characters dying to skirt censorship laws. Dismantling and demonising the institution of morality-based censorship is the only path to a place where no group is actively unable to express itself, and that includes groups we don’t like, because if it didn’t it would mean nothing.
It’s moronic, and infantilising, to prevent adults from consuming content in the privacy of their own home, just because you or I find it immoral or distasteful, simple as.
- they weren’t barred from publishing the mod
Are you telling me the people behind the decision to ban certain mods due to bigotry were holding a stance of “we are more than happy for you to publish your content, just not here for completely unrelated reasons” or are we being serious and we accept the fact that the stance is an explicit “these mods should not exist and we don’t want any part of them”?
They were barred from publishing the mods to the farthest extent he people barring them were capable of. Thankfully they don’t own the entire internet.
- they’re totally okay with using said tool in lots of cases where it was never used before
Are we talking about the same tools here? To be clear, I meant the tool of removing content from a site over political alignment, not tools as in “software tools.”
And if your argument is “well right wingers used admin authority to remove left-aligned game mods from sites” my reply is where and when, because I have 0 memory of LGBT-friendly mods ever facing pushback form hosting sites at any point in my 25+ years of gaming and playing modded games.
Institutions and pundits sure, but that was just as true of videogames as a whole so that’s not relevant here.
ETA: But even then, yes, the right is willing to do bad shit that erodes our institutions, are we going to chop off our noses to spite our faces or are we going to stand by principles even when they are not willing to?
But there are realistically always some rules on what kinds of hosted content is allowed on a page. […] Why is this a step too far compared to other cases that go beyond legal limits?
What legal limits? Nexusmods to my knowledge is a US company; there is no law against depicting a non-inclusive world (such as in the case of the pride flag removal mod for spiderman), or even outright discrimination of any kind in media, nor are there laws against outright political speech that discriminates, so long as it’s only speech, and it is not a direct and actionable incitement to violence.
Are we to assume that any site needs to adhere only to the freedoms that ALL countries would allow it, the narrowest subset possible, or are they to abide by the laws of the country where they are hosted and incorporated as a company? Because I will remind you that every single LGBT mod hosted on nexus is breaking laws in countries totaling a 4th of the human race, give or take.
Unfortunately I can’t take you seriously if you really think this:
Are you telling me the people behind the decision to ban certain mods due to bigotry were holding a stance of “we are more than happy for you to publish your content, just not here for completely unrelated reasons” or are we being serious and we accept the fact that the stance is an explicit “these mods should not exist and we don’t want any part of them”?
The “people behind the decision” are business people who were worried about ad revenue due to being associated with such mods. These people don’t give a fuck about the mod being available anywhere else as long as it doesn’t negatively affect their own bottom line. So yes, I’m telling you exactly that.
Which legal limits? The US? Iran? Whose moral compass does a site need to follow. Legality/morality as an argument on the global Internet is weak in my mind. Also why should a hoster be in charge of what is ethic and what is not? Take spider-man, were the prideflag removal mods stupid? Yes. Does it mean nexus should remove them? No.
The limits of the countries where the businesses operate, and any ethical and moral limits the people behind the company see?
Come on, at least give arguments instead of asking questions with obvious answers.
People downvoting you for asking a simple question just demonstrates how fucking toxic everyone is over this.
The company that now owns SteamDB has this bolded on their front page:
We acquire. We amplify. We conquer.
It can’t really get more dystopian than that.
NexusMods themselves went to absolute shit, requiring an account for stuff like downloading mods, and getting a premium subscription for basic features like “Instant downloads”, “Viewing more mods per page”, and “The ability to choose a preferred download server”.
SteamDB used to provide a completely free (in price) service, with no strings attached. This was by far the most common usecase of the service. Seeing the history of NexusMods and the company that owns it, this will change. The moment SteamDB requires an account for previously public info, or even a premium subscription, is the moment the service becomes unusable for most. Effectively, SteamDB is marked for death.
NexusMods themselves went to absolute shit, requiring an account for stuff like downloading mods, and getting a premium subscription for basic features like “Instant downloads”, “Viewing more mods per page”, and “The ability to choose a preferred download server”.
I don’t remember a time when this wasn’t the case. Download servers are expensive.
None of those things were changed after the acquisition lmfao. If it “went to absolute shit” the moment you discovered NexusMods, the problem was you
Not sure why they’re being upvoted but you’re right. I’ve been using nexus since the skyrim days and it’s always had tiered downloads, account requirement and limited mods/page. Just about the only changes I’ve seen are the “refreshed” layout and the abundance of ads (which I have admittedly used an adblock for)
Yeah, that’s how i remember it from when i used it years and years ago.
I’m pretty sure you even needed an account back when it was TESSource.
it is mostly about eventually plastering steamdb with ads and requiring logins… secondary, i think the presented data will be slightly less trusted after the aquisition.
and it also is kinda about a “community project” being gobbled up by corpos
Because they got bought out by venture capital. Even if they’re not so bad currently, they’re eventually going to want a return on their “investment,” and that return is going to come at the expense of the users.
