• mrpres@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Anyone wondering what they have in common: EU (i know its not the same as EEA, there are countries like Iceland non-member of EU but part of EEA and they have their own GDPR through their own Private Act) has GDPR, Japan has APPI, UK has UK-GDPR, Switzerland has FADP

      Whats intriguing is that Canada has DCIA and Brazil has LGPD and I don’t see it being mentioned to be turned off by default in either countries

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Gemini has popped up pnce since it became a thing. I simply clicked no and it’s gone away. So hopefully it stays away.

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Unfortunately not. That’s like saying “A burglar put a spycam in my house once. I simply said no and he removed it. So hopefully it stays that way”. It’s there, you just can’t see it now.

    • mrpres@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Would having aliases be a good way to bypass when a website denies your emails from your domain (which is known occurrence for who self-hosts their own email system)?

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I run my own email and I have to say I wouldn’t recommend it.

      The biggest hassle is dealing with either Spamhaus or Microsoft, who apparently at random decide to put my IPs on blacklist, and who provide hurdles to working around this (for Spamhaus) or just say “no” (for Microsoft).

    • atlien51@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Your new dentist/GP practice when you try to sign up?

      @ Thunderbird? What is that?

    • kokomo@lemmy.kokomo.cloud
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mega brain move right here. Combined with a multitude of open source web mail clients and ur golden. SOGo and roundcube my beloved.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most email is short. I don’t see a need to summarize it. Google is run by idiots and assholes.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ai will write complicated long mails, you’ll need an Ai to summarise it

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      ive actually used it at work for stuff like “when did Wendy approve the design? did she send it to brian?” when I have 5 different email threads over 3 different organizations, with 10 different respondees. But in personal use I would never.

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If mine could do that “find me the approval email for x last week” I’d use it, but if outlook had a decent search I wouldn’t need it.

      • Ushmel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’d settle for AI clipping out everyone’s redundant signatures, .gif logos, comic sans bible quotes, and everything else packed into email that people use as direct messaging. Or my coworkers could just use WebEx for chats instead of emails.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You go ahead and waste resources on summarizing the 200 emails a day in my spam account, you fucking morons.

  • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    A single message now generates 20 different summaries and analyses, requiring a rack of GPUs and a diesel generator.

    We’re so lucky that electricity is unlimited and free, otherwise it might’ve caused a serious problem.

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Don’t worry, this stuff is why companies like Google want to build and run their own nuclear power plants. What could possibly go wrong?

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So this is why I got an email that was completely wrong.

    I told a guy I used to work for that I moved and it’s the perfect place to help him and his company.

    He replied that he hopes I found a house where I used to live.

    wtf it’s like he never read the email at all, now that this AI trash was added, the email makes sense.

    I guess he is fucked and doesn’t get the help he needs for his company.

  • kazerniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ok this is the first step where I feel an actual urge to look for Gmail alternatives. (Been a Gmail user since like 2007.) I’m a desktop-only Gmail user, but I can see where this is going… :/ Also heavy user of Google Drive and Sheets, so it’s going to be annoying if I have to replace all of them :/

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How the hell can they even afford that?! There are so many Gmail users and so many emails a second and Gemini will summarize them all? That sounds so expensive and like a waste of resources

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is, but the bubble mustn’t burst or the grifters will stop making money selling “the end of skilled labor” to braindead capitalists.

      • dumbpotato@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Actually, investment in AI is necessary for competing with other nations.

        The “end of skilled labor” selling point is just to cover up that fact that we need AI because other nations will have it.

        Countries are modern-day fiefs.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Alright, let’s tear this idea apart in plain, no-BS language. The whole “we gotta invest in AI to keep up with other nations” argument is like saying you need the flashiest new phone just because your neighbor got one—even if your old phone still works perfectly fine. Sure, some countries are all-in on AI like it’s the latest craze, but that doesn’t mean we have to jump on the bandwagon and mess up our lives.

          The whole “end of skilled labor” hype is really just a cover-up. People have been doing amazing work with their hands and brains for ages—long before AI even existed. And let’s talk downsides: more people losing jobs, a privacy mess, and decisions being made by glitchy algorithms that might not give a damn about real-life problems. We didn’t need AI to build everything we have today. We’ve been doing just fine without handing over our lives to a bunch of computer code.

          So, if you’re buying into the “we need AI to keep up with the cool kids on the global stage” nonsense, you’re ignoring the fact that the smart move might just be hanging on to good old human skill. Instead of racing into an AI-fueled chaos, maybe we should just keep doing what we do best—using our brains and common sense.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Google makes a lot of money, and summarising stuff uses a surprisingly small amount of energy. You can do it trivially on-device on a laptop and on plenty of phones.

      When it comes to LLMs, training the models is generally the thing that requires ridiculous amounts of energy.

      This is dumb as fuck, though. I don’t want Google’s LLM to miss out critical details in my emails. That shit could be important. If people want this they should opt in.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Would opting out actually do anything except keep you from using the feature? Pretty certainly they will still let the ai read your emails if there is any benefit to google in it, but you just wont be seeing the summary.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you read the article, it says this only applies to people that already have premium google office stuff already. The 90% of people with regular gmail accounts aren’t affected by this. For now at least.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, let’s break it down with a little humor and a nod to the inevitable AI email overlords!

        Sure, the article points out that the premium Google Workspace users get a special treatment—like being offered champagne instead of soda—but if you’re part of the 90% rolling with regular Gmail, you’re still enjoying your familiar, free soda pop (for now). However, don’t get too comfortable: whether you’re sipping premium champagne or pop, Google’s AI is always lurking in the background, ready to “swallow” your emails and extract insights like a digital detective. In other words, even if you’re not part of the fancy club, your emails are still part of the grand data buffet.

        So while the article might claim it’s all rainbows and free soda for most, the truth is that Google is perfecting their AI trick regardless of your account type. It’s like distinguishing between first-class and economy on a flight—different levels of service, but everyone’s still on the same plane, and the in-flight entertainment (that is, AI data crunching) is serving up free snacks to all!

    • dumbpotato@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have been moving away from all of the big name companies for big name products.

      It’s a shame, because I used to be very supportive of Google.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ex-Google fan boy here. Been riding the fuck Google wagon for about 7 years now, no regrets, and certain I’m missing out on absolutely nothing. Moving away from all these self-serving BS “tech giants” is the smartest and healthiest move anyone can do.

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do any other email services/clients have a very similar search function? Where I can search for date ranges and email sizes in addition to the more typical operators.

      At my workplace I have to deal with Outlook, and it’s a pile of crap in comparison.

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have a Google account at work with the domain name of the company. The AI is annoying and I wished they used something else.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is it never the other way around? I’m sick of EULA updates silently enrolling me into things i never asked for

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        2 days ago

        And we’ll just watch them either get slapped by an insignificant fine, or watch them weasel their way out of this again, by claiming they made you agree to some perpetual abandonment of rights, like they always do

      • dreugeworst@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        it says you need to have smart features on for this to work. I went looking for how to turn it off, but aparently in the EU, UK, Japan and others it’s off by default

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plus the options are frequently hidden and unclear.

      I thought disabling One Drive on my Windows machine would keep it from syncing to the cloud. Nope, it just changed where the files were stored but Windows copies it to One Drive even when One Drive isn’t running.

      In the case of google, I assume that turning off the Gemini bullshit doesn’t have any impact on it copying all the content to their servers even if you don’t see it happening.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        but Windows copies it to One Drive even when One Drive isn’t running.

        I don’t understand why users and our justice system let them get away with this. This is malicious. Your operating system is literally literally malware. It does not respect your choices and it steals your information.

        • normonator@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s just untrue though, onedrive doesn’t work like that. I’m not saying Microsoft doesnt steal data either, but onedrive isn’t required for that. In fact it can suck so hard it won’t sync shit while running.

          Defender can literally submit anything it wants to Microsoft by default and doesn’t hide it.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      to shove it in people’s faces who would never go out of their way to turn it on. probably like 99% of people.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe the even more important question: Why can you even opt out? Why is this not done on-device, without anything going anywhere to begin with?

      I mean, I know the answer, you know the answer, everyone knows the answer. If this was truly privacy preserving, there would be no need to opt out.

    • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The only thing I use my Google Account for is my TV. I haven’t logged into my gmail in years. And even that is a stretch. I use Jellyfin, and a sideloaded youtube client that doesn’t send anything back to Googs.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Show us the evidence of this claim about “Proton owner”. And yes, Tuta is great, I agree on that.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Hey, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’m sick of one clueless idiot posting something and then a whole crowd of brainless followers jumping on the bandwagon just to smear someone’s name (like what’s happening with Proton and Andy Chen, for example).

          Honestly, I couldn’t care less if Andy was Trump’s biggest fan. Proton’s track record on privacy is rock solid. I spent two years digging into Tuta, Proton, disroot, and a bunch of others until I finally settled on Proton for my family—and I’ve never looked back. My wife, who used to throw money at Google like it was cash to burn, finally got an email service she could actually trust. That’s what matters here.

          Now, I get it—Proton’s not perfect, and yeah, they’re a business with their own quirks and maybe some shady stuff waiting to surface. But we need to stop blindly following one crappy post without doing our own homework.

          And sure, I hate a lot about Trump (not to mention Musk, who I honestly think is even worse), but let’s be real: the alternative of having Kamala Harris at the helm could’ve been a total nightmare. When I imagine her running the world’s most powerful economy and military, I’m picturing a hot mess that would plunge everyone into chaos. You think you’re safe from one disastrous trainwreck, only to replace it with an even bigger one!

          Trump is pure asshole material, and you could probably say that about 90% of his cabinet and most Republicans too. So yeah, if you just skim the last bit, you might think I’m a Trump supporter. But if you read the whole thing, you’ll see I’m simply saying that, given the choices, staying on this crazy rollercoaster was the lesser of two evils. We need to weigh the bigger picture rather than jump on every outrage train without doing any actual research.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It was a really stupidly worded comment on his part. If he meant Big Tech and Little Tech spwcifically rather than Big Business in general and individual people, his choice of words and the claim that the tables had “completely turned” are really unfortunate. Tagging the annoying orange directly also doesn’t help make this look like it’s about the pick, rather than the picker.

          As an aside, forgive me if I withhold my enthusiasm until I see her actually pull something through and not just end up another way to cripple ElMo’s competition.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can’t go changing my email every time a ceo flips a switch and goes crazy. Your all gonna have to find something better than ‘just try this other one’

        • LwL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Get your own domain and use it for mail routing to whichever email service of your choice. Afaik gmail offers this, and so does probably any other decent email provider. That way if a provider turns to shit, you just need to set up with a different one, but don’t have to change any accounts.

          Downside: you will have to pay for that domain for the rest of your life (or change all accounts again)

          I’ve been meaning to do this for a while, maybe I’ll finally do it now.

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            This is the route I took, and at 10 dollars per year or so to maintain a domain, this is a very cheap way to remove some of the hold big tech has over our lives.

        • kazerniel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Btw (sort of just thinking out loud) could paying for an email domain be a solution? I see many webhosts offering email + domain packages for like 1-3 GBP/month, and we could just download the emails into, say, Thunderbird, so if a company turns shit, we still have the domain and all the emails received/sent over the years.

          • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ive actually been thinking about doing something like this. Im tired of being forced to rely on some company’s computer

          • Zexks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Good luck getting people to pay for their own email setups let alone learn what it takes to host themselves and move said hosted setup around as the hosting service ceo’s flip scripts.