• ALilOff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything has ads now, I don’t have a fire TV but surprised Amazon is this late to this bs game. The Xbox has ads now like with mw3 when you launch the console. My Visio Tv I spent ~1000 on a few years ago is stuffed with ads when you turn it on.

        • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A solution. Is it an Ad when it is for something you do yourself that solves problems about which you’ve publicly complained? Think there is another word for that. hmm. It sure suggests something that is specifically designed as being a definition for that. Sure suggests something, but I guess we’ll never know. I’d appreciate anyone recommendation upon a good word to use when someone offers a solution to something about which you complained. Any suggested recommendation would be welcome.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why my ‘smart’ TV will never, ever be connected to the internet. It’s an LG so I would expect it to not be onerous, but it’s often nagging me to connect to my router for stuff like AI tools.

      No thanks. You’re smart enough already for my use, TV! HDMI only please.

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a firm believer that smart should be self contained. If a device needs the internet, it’s not that smart since it has to rely on outside sources to work properly.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Although I agree with the sentiment. It’s like saying people that research are not smart.

          They should all just be thinkers like Einstein, let some other dummy find the proof.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not late. I’ve been using Fire Sticks for years and Amazon has been working hard the whole time to shove more and more ads all over the UI. The main row of apps gets smaller with every update and more and more ads are plastered around and between them to try to sell you more shit you don’t want or already have.

      I managed to jailbreak mine before they locked them down and install a custom launcher so they’re actually usable, but the stock UI is god-awful. I’ll be replacing them once the next round of Apple TVs come out.

      • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll be replacing them once the next round of Apple TVs come out.

        The Nvidia Shield Pro is quite capable. Sideload a different launcher and install Aerial Views and you’re good to go!

      • Tick_Dracy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got one cheap, but OMG it’s ridden with ads. I guess it’s too late for me to root it, no?

    • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not new, Amazon just changed their policy allowing ads for non-media. The Fire devices have always been primarily vehicles for ads; they take up the entire lockscreen on the Kindle reader and Fire tablets. On Fire TV, the top 40-ish% of the screen is a giant ad, then you get a tiny carousel of recommendations, then another thinner banner ad, then “your” content like queue and watchlist.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of my home monitoring cameras suddenly started placing ad watermarks on my video feed - I shit you not. I feel like obstitricians are going to start slapping ad stickers on newborns bellies as they pull them out soon enough. I hate it. I’m not completely sure what the answer is, but I’ve always been a proponent of the micropayment idea as a way to navigate digital life with more focus and less dependence on ads but it’s not caught on at all because HEY FREE!!

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank gosh my PS5 doesn’t yet have ads when I launch a game

    • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My tcl doesn’t have ads. Probably because it already knows I’ll ignore them and it’s selling that data

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    buying a ‘dumb’ tv is getting harder and harder to do…

    how long until you are forced to hook a new ‘smart’ one up to the internet, just to “set it up”–even if you have no plans on ever using the ‘smart’ features or embedded apps?

      • PlungeButter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can choose not to connect a Roku TV to the Internet during the initial setup, and you just get access to live TV and the HDMI inputs with (obviously) no streaming channels or updates. It works fine as a dumb TV.

        And the credit card thing? That’s after you create your account on their website, you can just close the browser window. Or click the button saying “skip” or “later” or whatever it is.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looking forward to the 1 yr free trial of my new TV, before I have to subsribe to Samsung+ for just 15.99 per month to turn it on.

    • PigsInClover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. You can buy the displays that are marketed to businesses and usually come without all of the invasive smart features.

      They definitely cost more on average, but they’re also built to run more often or constantly, and hold up far better. They’re even a lot more customizable.

      You can buy some that come with slots where you put in a raspberry pi or another computer of your choice, instead of whatever OS that comes with smart tvs.

      At this point, I’m starting to regularly check if there are “for business customers” options available when I need something, because the options for regular consumers are getting so bad with all this data hoarding and ad pushing.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you buy a Sony Bravia you can put them into “pro mode” which keeps all the signal processing, but lets you turn off android.

      • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the point they are making. Currently that’s possible. But what is stopping the producers to force you to hook it up to the internet?

        • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          O… damn.

          Not buying the tv might work… at mass. Like everyone. Please people, vote with your wallet/privacy.

          • ares35@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            roku because you ‘need’ an account to use (try here for one without a payment method requirement).

            vizio must be a new thing for the current models. mine (bought last year, and was “last year’s” model then) didn’t need a net connection to set up for using as a ‘monitor’.

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t figure out why the cheap TCL I bought 5 years ago isn’t packed with ads. Maybe because it’s Roku-based?

        • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Disturbing; thanks for sharing that. Seems like the Roku flavor may be okay-ish, but I just walled it off from rest of home network anyway.

          • Adramis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, TCL was the front-runner when I was looking for a non-smart TV until I saw that. :( I ended up just going with a samsung and hoping for the best. I’ve not noticed anything annoying, but we’re probably going to switch back to a PC hooked up to the TV with all the subscription problems / price jacking lately.

            • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Functionally, it’s proven to be a really great TV, particularly at the price point. At most, only one ad in the interface, and it’s for a movie typically.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not always an option. You’d need to dim the lights every time and - most importantly - have a whole spare wall in your home.

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Im sure you could mount a rollup projector screen anywhere you would put your TV, but your first point is huge. The light issue is a huge non starter

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Two of our TVs hang from the arms in the corners and one occupies a bookshelf. I am not sure it would work that well with a screen that’s less than a meter wide.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stuffing ads on streaming services? How could Amazon do such a thing?

    Anyway, for your consideration, Barbie (at last!), now available on streaming services everywhere.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have you tagged as ‘probably actually her’ just because I want it to be true.

        • modifier@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is a fantastic answer, but this is Lemmy, not TV, and Margot Robbie’s name is Margot Robbie.

          I’m not trying to call you out, nor draw you out though. I’m not into parasocial relationships, but I do love the idea of Lemmy’s first celebrity user being the actor that literally played Barbie. It’s just a delightful thought.

          But being the first novelty account: also fine.

          These are all important milestones for Lemmy.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely forgot about tags. My first Lemmy tag is now ‘probably actually her.’

        • modifier@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hopefully not on me, because I can assure you that I am a 4 year old Polish Lowland Sheepdog, and not acclaimed actor Margot Robbie. Please tag responsibly.

          • simonced@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Duuuuude! I didn’t know boost existed for Lemmy! Thanks you!
            Boost, here I come!

  • MrSqueezles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This needs to become illegal. Ads are part of the price you pay for a device or service. If you didn’t agree to them at the time of purchase, they can’t be sprung on you after you’ve paid.

  • cestvrai@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actually kinda surprised that chromecast doesn’t have ads, at least the model we have.

    We have a dumb projector with features such as “select source”.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original cast-only chromecasts didn’t have ads as far as I know, but they’ve all been discontinued and replaced by the google tv chromecasts which have ads integrated throughout the interface, mostly just for streaming services, movies, etc.

      • pseudonym@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck seriously? I have a Chromecast from like 7 years ago and I was considering getting a newer model just because, you know, improvements and stuff. But definitely not if there are ads. Holy shit no.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google TV has ads, though they are for the moment easy to miss or ignore.

      For the moment.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is sort of what happened with Google Chromecast with Google TV. I bought that on a technicality for my parents over an Apple TV. My mom (who isn’t a native English speaker) was watching another foreign language show on Netflix and whenever she paused on the Apple TV the seek bar would come in and overlay itself on the subtitles. She was frequently pausing just to catch up on the long sentences to read them and then unpausing just as quickly. This wasn’t an issue on the Android-based Netflix, where the subtitles remained in view.

    Well OF COURSE because it’s fucking Google they started shoving more and more ads onto the device, to the extent that my parents actually get pretty confused on how to properly navigate the thing. It makes me so mad.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have a nearly-dumb TV (chosen for that and never connected to the Internet) and a separate little Android TV box I got from AliExpress for 25 bucks were I only use Kodi.

    The TV is maybe 4 years old, the little box maybe 1 year (I had a 10 year old similar thing before but it can’t handle newer video formats so I switched).

    Have yet to see a single Ad.

    Mind you my setup is as is because I’ve long ago learned that you want your fast-changing-cheap-tech bits separate from your expensive-long-life stuff, so in this case I want my digital video file decoding hardware separate from the much more expensive large digital TV screen so that I can switch the former without paying a new of the - much more expensive - latter.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s been a lot of articles recently about those cheapo boxes being filled with spyware straight out the factory. Might wanna check that out.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It still freaks me out a bit that TVs come with Wi-Fi antennas, and that some of them may/will connect to public networks if they see them. If that’s the case, how the hell do you prevent it? Disassemble the TV to disable it yourself!?

      Edit: why the downvotes? Am I wrong?

      • n3mo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure why you’re being downvoted. But you’re correct—some TVs have been found to automatically connect to open wifi networks to phone home.

    • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I have a Vizio smart TV but each time you turn it on it acts 100% like a dumb tv until you press the smart button.

      I have a seperate shitty little HTPC that’s used for all the media and my brother uses his xbox.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember that “deal” always has depth behind it. They are waiting to reach critical mass so they can “throw the switch”. Streaming services, “smart” devices, subscription services… You should only engage with these “deals” if you understand the bigger picture and have a plan to disengage quickly as soon as they pull their bullshit.

    Your black Friday TV is NOT the same as the TV that brand typically sells. It’s a different sku, all the parts are deliberately sourced lesser quality versions and it’s literally designed to break/fail earlier than the “normal” version. You’re not getting a deal on the TV you wanted, you’re buying a lesser TV - Not necessarily a bad thing if you know what you’re buying, but you need to know what you’re buying.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a big lack of consumer education in the U.S. I don’t know how to solve it in our oligarchical society. The corporations don’t want consumers educated.

      • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        There should be regulation of the private sector. There has to be some accountability for these corporations. The onus can’t be on the consumer one hundred percent of the time. It really shouldn’t be at all. Buyers should only be responsible for deciding which products would be best for them and their budget, not for having to predict which corporation will utterly fuck them over the least out of the only three corporations they have to choose from when they’re all trying to scam them out of their money.

        I’m so sick of being scammed every single time I buy something. The government needs to step in and do their job instead of just handing out a few fines here and there.

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      People said “Aw, they won’t do that” when streaming eclipsed cable television. Yet, here we are.

      Anybody who ever says “they won’t do that” clearly doesn’t have a clue how nothing is off the table for capitalism.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even a Windows computer, like a laptop. An HDMI cable isn’t hard to plug in.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even learning to broadcast programming from your laptop to your TV has a learning curve. Meanwhile, you can just push a button on the TV and get to Netflix. The problem is that now half the space is going to be taken up with ads, and not even relevant ones.

          • Index_Case@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. It seems people often completely miss the human behaviour element of this whole issue. Just saying ‘LeARn to TEcH N00b’ isn’t helpful or realistic in the real world for most people. I have family that still won’t touch a computer, or only use one for the most basic of browsing and email, but they can use a TV remote without issue.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If thats the price of freedom then I think one should definitely become tech savvy.

        Besides, isn’t saying that you’re not tech savvy in today’s tech world kind of admitting that you’re willfully ignorant and only buy tech stuff for show?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You think people only buy TVs for show? That’s a very strange thing to suggest. People buy TVs so they can watch shows. For over 70 years, all they’ve had to do is turn it on and maybe turn a knob or push a couple of buttons and that’s it. Expecting people to learn more than that is too much for many people. And saying you aren’t tech savvy isn’t some shameful thing except to people who are tech savvy. Even if it does mean someone is ignorant, that doesn’t mean they deserve to be taken advantage of.

          • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One way to look at this is that if you buy a bike, you should have at least basic understanding of its work and repair process. If you run a car, you should know the traffic rules. Similar in internet world, but only not explicitly implied.

            Ignorant people should not be taken advantage of. But this is more like a principle than application. Currently, the internet is like a wild wild west. The more techy you are, more you can save your mental health. It is just the lack of awareness in people that make companies take advantage of them. IMO, Tech-literacy is a necessity, just like traffic rules or basic life support.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tech literacy is beyond many people. They are very confused by it. Not everyone has the capacity to be able to learn things on that subject. There is no subject everyone can be well-versed in, especially not a complicated one.

              And, again, TVs have just worked for over 70 years. Why should people who have watched TV all of their lives expect to suddenly have to do some complicated new thing just to avoid Amazon fucking them over?

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You think people only buy TVs for show?

            Certainly in my country, people who don’t know how to setup a computer still choose to buy one.

            People buy TVs so they can watch shows

            Maybe the boomer generation. I am a millenial running a pihole and subscribing to OTT. This is true of others in my generation and younger.

            And saying you aren’t tech savvy isn’t some shameful thing except to people who are tech savvy.

            Well it’s not shameful in that it requires ridicule. I just think it’s a bit embarrassing for me personally that a lot of people don’t bother learning tech stuff. It’s similar to people declaring that they don’t read books. In this day and age, being tech savvy is kind of required to navigate a lot of society.

            Even if it does mean someone is ignorant, that doesn’t mean they deserve to be taken advantage of.

            I know that, you know that, the companies exploiting the ignorant and elderly know that. So there’s no better cure than for the ignorant to learn.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Still sounds like you’re blaming the people being taken advantage of because they don’t know things you do.

        • Index_Case@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Leaving aside the silly thing about buying stuff for show (which may be true of a fraction, but not the vast majority), I disagree.

          While becoming ‘tech-savvy’ might allow people to navigate around the pervasive ads in techn like the Fire Stick, it’s unrealistic to expect this level of expertise from the average person. People have a myriad of responsibilities and interests competing for their attention; not everyone has the luxury of dedicating time to become a tech expert just to avoid advertisements. This expectation completely ignores the complexity of our lives and the sheer volume of knowledge required to custom-build solutions like a media PC, or build your own media library. It’s not about being willfully ignorant; it’s about the practical realities of everyday life.

          • Index_Case@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also, the implication that not being tech-savvy is a form of willful ignorance is unrealistically dismissive of the different talents and intelligence people possess. Being proficient in the many and various technology’s is just one skill set among many, and people value privacy and simplicity without having to jump through hoops to achieve it. Technology should serve to enhance our lives, not add another layer of complexity. The burden should not fall solely on consumers to fend off invasive advertising; it is also the responsibility of companies to respect their users’ desire for a straightforward and unobtrusive experience. (Though I suspect we both agree this bit is more dream than reality…)

            • eskimofry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it is also the responsibility of companies to respect their users’ desire for a straightforward and unobtrusive experience.

              I am not holding my breath, at least until such time as companies actually change away from focusing purely on growth, money left on the table and towards sustainable business.

              Also, the implication that not being tech-savvy is a form of willful ignorance is unrealistically dismissive of the different talents and intelligence people possess.

              It doesn’t take enormous effort to be at least aware of the shenanigans of the devices we interact with daily. Some people don’t even bother with that.

              If one knows how to setup wifi in their house… The next logical thing is how to configure their TVs, then on to a wifi extender, etc.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find a dedicated HTPC is just overkill in terms of hardware these days. I just use Kodi sideloaded onto a Fire stick and point it to my file server for all my media. There are methods to get Kodi to launch on startup or to remap one of the stupid service-related buttons on the newer remotes to launch it instead.

      Ads on the home screen? I don’t give a shit, I’m just there for a second to launch an app. Ads while searching? Cool, I don’t think I’ve ever used the device’s built in search.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a NanoPC-T4 that I use as a server, the thing would in principle make a good set top box – it’s what Rockchip designed the RK3399 for, after all, it can decode 4k h.264 and h.265, and it’s from 2016 (I got it for its pcie lanes, a rarity with arm boards).

        None of those SmartTVs run expensive hardware, any reasonably fresh potato can do what they do.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you bought a Vizio TV 4 years ago it now has a “feature” where it switches inputs to the ad-ridden integrated android system if it detects that whatever input you are on doesn’t have a signal for more than 5 seconds. Even if you pull it from the network it still tries to load it anyway. It’s becoming unavoidable even for those of us who roll our own solutions.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Shield TV is one of the better TV boxes. In fact, the Apple TV and the Shield TV are the only TV boxes I would ever use, if I had to use one. I’m very happy with my custom HTPC though.

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m very happy with my custom HTPC though.

          Fair enough, although I might add that there is not a better way to run Kodi but HTPC, even when the Shield is more than a capable client, it sucks from time to time, I blame the limited RAM of the device.

          • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The HTPC solution is not for everyone, but I’m really enthusiastic about my setup, so it’s my preferred way of consuming media on a TV. The Shield TV is totally fine though.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m really shocked that this is the Technology community and it’s full of people complaining about ads. We’re supposed to be the geeks who are laughing at the normies for watching those ads while we watch content on our techy solution which is immune to such garbage.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re supposed to be the geeks who are laughing at the normies for watching those ads while we watch content on our techy solution which is immune to such garbage

        Many of us are, but some aren’t. We can teach them about it.

      • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are talking for the normies here. And it is becoming more and more difficult to block ads and trackers even for moderately savvy person.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. Small Intel NUC, Linux, and one of those Air mouse remotes are all I need.

      It’s hard not to be that guy and mention how neat such a setup is every time I have to watch someone else fumbling around with the horribly designed and ad-ridden UI of their “smart” TV.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do wonder what makes some people despise ads.

    I myself do, but I’ve never been told to or even been echo chambered (well maybe now, but not always). Going back over tens years and detested them.

    But at work some people think ad-blockers shouldn’t be a thing as it’s stealing as the internet runs on ads and I just can’t see that point of view. However valid it could be.

    I don’t want to see them all my digital life as they are on the real world. Christ I’ve seen them on the pissing motorway ffs.

    • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ads can be a reasonable price to pass for free or discounted content.

      The issue is that every day, every year, they are finding new ways to shove even more ads. The more they’re shoved, the less reasonable it becomes. Where the line between reasonable and unacceptable is will vary per person. However, there is a point where enough becomes enough and you just become done with them.

    • greenskye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      In theory, I’m fine with some ads. Useful ads in places where it makes sense (like shopping). Small, unobtrusive ads that fill up otherwise empty space. But ads are like capitalism and cancer. They just continue to grow and grow and get worse and worse until they’ve utterly destroyed the thing they were meant to support. If you let them in, it’s only a matter of time until they completely take over. No one has managed to do ‘reasonable ads’ for any great length of time.

      It’s just one of those things where in theory it sounds workable, but in practice it’s highly destructive and corrosive towards everything.

      • aceshigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I concur. The problem isn’t the ads themselves, but ads in a capitalist society, where profit has no ceiling and neither do the amount of ads.

    • elrik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Advertising is intended to manipulate preferences and choices. Why would I willingly subject myself to such manipulation?

    • Isycius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I’m okay with old concept of ads. But it was them that decided that ads must double dip with customer information and it was them that decided that ads viewed by people who are engaged to the ads doesn’t count as ads that was ‘seen’.

      Continuous race to the bottom since then.