• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fun fact! The picture of the girl in this meme comes from this video, (relevant portion about 3 minutes in) in which she’s by far the calmest and most reasonable person involved. She’s not even angry, she just has kind of an expressive face, and she looks like that for all of exactly one frame

    Some psycho combed through this video frame by frame to find the least flattering picture of her possible. Rightoids need to die out man

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is in fact incorrect: the right doesn’t say corrupt government is the problem The right says trans kids and brown people are the problem. Because the right is dumb as a fucking brick, and the billionaires managed to brainwash the dumb right into hating someone other than themselves.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s an issue with definitions. When the right says the government is corrupt, they mean socially corrupt. When the left talks about the corrupt, they mean fiscally corrupt.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The right thinks that people are socially corrupt. Not the government. They think the government shouldn’t enable that corruption. But when it comes down to it, they hate people. They don’t hate institutions.

        • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The right wanting to eradicate minorities has nothing to do with fiscal corruption. It’s just pure evil.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I know this is a shitpost, but I’ve seen people legitimately give this argument like it’s a gotcha. It’s like, okay? So if we get rid of the corrupt billionaires running the corrupt government, then the other corrupt billionaires will use their vast wealth to seize power for the billionaires again, so the problem is indeed the corrupt billionaires - we need to get rid of them all. It’s like taking antibiotics - you can’t stop when you start feeling better, you can only stop when you’ve gotten rid of the whole infection, or it’ll just come back stronger.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      A system designed deliberately to incentivize greed will inevitably reproduce these exact circumstances, the greediest and least scrupulous always rise to the top

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Both sides are now 30% of the electorate or less (pick your poll, D&R are very close).

        Independents are now 40% of the voters.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Both sides is a pretentious asshole, are you seriously suggesting that 30-40% of all politically active US citizens are pretentious assholes?

          I am an independent and I have zero issues seeing the ruling class and the culture they have created as the problem. Blaming it on the government is short sighted and plays into the wealthy’s hands. That is just stupid in my book.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        He wants to return to a glorified past that never existed by tearing down the current system, a return to where everyone is living off the land like early humans (“climbing the vines growing along the Sears tower”). He promotes the idea that men must return to being warriors, and something about the modern world has made them “weak.” He promotes that such strength must be used to dominate, and claims it can be used to improve people’s lives, as he claims with Raymond K. Hessel (whom Tyler threatens to murder if Hessel does not follow his dreams), despite the fact that Hessel is most likely left devastated with trauma and unable to move forward due to fear of being murdered. We never see Hessel’s outcome, so Tyler gets to pretend he “helped” by completely traumatizing a person (reminds me of Trump bragging about “lifting people off of food stamps” when he actually kicked them off and made them more hungry, his followers don’t see the outcome so they just believe the lie). Tyler captures the attention of disaffected, alienated young men and brings them under his wing to become part of their in-group, making them more likely to go along with extreme demands because now they have found family in Project Mayhem. He literally beats the living shit out of one of his men, destroying his pretty face, and yet still commands the respect of his men while disfiguring one of them potentially permanently. With Project Mayhem he intends to bring about his ideal world by force.

        So we have numbers 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of Umberto Eco’s 14 features of Ur-Fascism in Tyler and Project Mayhem, in my opinion.

        But sure, he’s not a fascist.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Without your bad rephrasing:

          1 - “The cult of tradition” - At no point he gives any shit to tradition

          2 - “The rejection of modernism” - That’s partial at best, and partial hits do not count on that scale

          3 - “The cult of action for action’s sake” - Yes

          4 - “Disagreement is treason” - Absolutely not

          5 - “Fear of difference” - Dude, how the fuck did you claim he hits that one? Absolutely not

          6 - “Appeal to a frustrated middle class” - Yes

          7 - “Obsession with a plot” - Yes

          8 - cast their enemies as “at the same time too strong and too weak” - Their enemies are never strong

          9 - “Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy” - Absolutely not

          10 - “Contempt for the weak” - Absolutely not

          11 - “Everybody is educated to become a hero” - Yes

          12 - “Machismo” - Yes

          13 - “Selective populism” - Yes

          14 - “Newspeak” - No

          Anyway, it’s complete bullshit to just list those criteria like they are a checklist. I’ve listed them here just to show that even that bullshit argument is bullshit by its own standards.

          Are you claiming that fascists don’t need to be authoritarian? It’s not on the list, by the way.

        • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Its been a long time since I’ve seen the movie but I always thought he was an anarchist who just wanted to burn everything to the ground.

          • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fascists coopting socialist language to obfuscate their class loyalties and goals is unfortunately fairly common

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, presenting themselves as just standing for the common man and wanting to tear down a broken system and don’t have ulterior motives is one hundred percent on brand for fascists.

            Also “waahhh, my penthouse is too nice, my job is too boring, I get paid too much and I’m a bored white man” is the narrator, the man Tyler was covering up, a weak man’s idea of a strong man. “I look how you wanna look, I talk how you want to talk, I fuck how you want to fuck.” He is literally a manifestation of what the narrator, a weak person, thinks a strong person is.

  • bequirtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The left also thinks corrupt government is a problem

    Meanwhile the right proudly advertises their love for corrupt billionaires