The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.
“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”
I like the sounds of this. Here’s an offer:
Fuck off, and the guillotine gets put away.
Everybody wins!
If you get rid of your right to privacy, you get rid of your right to safety.
How about we compromise by saying remove them all, give back the money spent, delete all data and in exchange you don’t get the treatments due one helping enable orwillian levels of suvelance
Yup, the compromise is not sending him to Tennessee to be publically hanged.
What are you talking about?
Hey question… its illegal (I think) to suggest or call for the hanging of someone. But is it illegal to publish and support legislation calling for the execution of public figures involved in X Y Z?
If not, I call for legislation to be passed that criminalized the usage of personal data for surveillance. Data collected without permission…
I need to think this through a little more but fuck it right? Make a proposed law that people can publicly support that show just how goddamn serious people are about this shit.
Ok. You spend the rest of your life in jail, and your immediate and extended family can live.
They won’t be rich. They will be held accountable if they broke the law as well.
Or we can exterminate 50-100k people to give justice to billions.
Either option is acceptable to me.
There should be no compromising our right to privacy and these cameras need to go. Fuck Flock and their cash grab.
Need to expand from pulling down camera to pulling down Flock buildings, manufacturing sites, etc.
Can’t get manufacturing sites. They are all parts bin contract manufactured from lowest bidder garbage in China as cheap as possible. Warehousing tho
You don’t negotiate with terrorists, Nazis, or billionaires.
Interesting that he’s framing it as a balance between privacy and safety instead of privacy and security.
Flock cameras haven’t been proven to make anyone safer.
If anything they actively make people unsafe by falsely flagging drivers with a partial tag match for a stolen vehicle
Don’t forget all the stalking by many various people abusing the database and live feeds
They’ve proven that police are just dumb as fuck.
That was well known before Flock.
It’s afraid
Safety for who, exactly, Garrett? Because the common people aren’t safer with this overreach
Safety for his fellow fascist pedophile Epstein class oligarchs; from the people.
Just wait til Flocko’ween.
I’ve already picked out my costume!!
Sexy Lumberjack?
A combo costume with my partner. Going as Kylo Ren and Stimpy
It’s wild, because when I was a kid, there was this huge conservative talking point about how trading freedom for security was bad.
Conservatives will say anything to align with the in-group, to hurt the outgroup, or for personal power. They have no internal beliefs beyond those.
Conservatives are all about freedom until there’s profit involved.
I AGREE! There IS common Ground between allowing the Epstein Class to SPY ON CHILDREN and the People who think CHILD RAPISTS Spying on Children is WRONG! Maybe just a COUPLE MILLION of Taxpayer Dollars to Spy on Children as a Treat?
-Centrists!
