• rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Samsung uses monopoly tactics and government support to bankrupt smaller companies and then raise prices. They’re scum.

    RAM is so important to the world economy that their patents should be made public.

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Computer components being privatized is almost as stupid as privatizing grain in the 1500s. Sure, there are alternatives, but… Are there?

  • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In a better world, all of these technologies that get stolen by various corpo espionage and reverse engineering teams would be freely shared with the world so everyone can benefit from them, and people not in the dev teams might have improvements they can suggest.

    But instead we have a bunch of rich adult children who would rather take the ball and go home because they don’t think they’ve recieved enough praise for bringing it, and wanting to charge everyone just to look at it.

    It’s not a great metaphor, but honestly dealing with companies and governments feels a lot like dealing with children you aren’t allowed to discipline or even talk sternly to because their parents have forbidden you from interfering.

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You mean 40 years of delay for the destruction of our biosphere?

        It’s call that a win.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 hours ago

          40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines

          Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue

          • jdr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases.

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That’s why I said we don’t know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines

              With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Let’s not forget that mega corpos benefit heavily from government subsidized R&D in universities, insert themselves within the R&D and claim innovation as their own.

      Tech is built on FOSS and private corporations act like they invented butter.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents. RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

  • wedge@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Guessing they won’t get much in the way of public sympathy given they’re bending consumers over the barrel. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We need to stop them from stealing 1 corporations IP, so tech corporations can continue making monopoly money off the entire human species stolen IP!

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Proving all this in court could give Samsung a powerful weapon moving forward. Legal experts believe the company might take sworn statements straight to the US International Trade Commission, a body with the authority to block foreign products from entering the country entirely.

    Which does not help because not every country will ban them and The other manufacturers will then have less demand and therefore have to reduce their prices in order to continue selling the same amount

    Edit: Doing so may slow the rate of the price decline in the US, but it will not stop it.