Visually… it just functions like a copy blocker, which news sites have tried forever to fight plagarism.
The original text is still in the website’s source, in plain text.
…I don’t even understand what its supposed to accomplish. Just make copy-paste more difficult for humans, or agents looking at the page visually? The raw page source is the thing that’s scraped, AFAIK.
It’s 100% scrappable. Nothing there stops me for scrapping the true text. It’s a very minor inconvenience at most. I would even argue that’s more of a pain for users and developers than for scrappers.
I just did. To allow screen readers which is what AI would do if this became a common block it uses this:
" Pressing it sets the reader’s browser to solving a compute-heavy puzzle: JavaScript and a few seconds of processing, more than most mass scrapers are willing to spend."
Which is exactly the method already addressed in the article:
" requiring computationally expensive systems to access the content"
Try looking up how ShieldFont actually works. Or look at the code yourself; it’s open source.
I just tried the demo.
Visually… it just functions like a copy blocker, which news sites have tried forever to fight plagarism.
The original text is still in the website’s source, in plain text.
…I don’t even understand what its supposed to accomplish. Just make copy-paste more difficult for humans, or agents looking at the page visually? The raw page source is the thing that’s scraped, AFAIK.
I’m looking their demo website https://shieldfont.org/demo/
It’s 100% scrappable. Nothing there stops me for scrapping the true text. It’s a very minor inconvenience at most. I would even argue that’s more of a pain for users and developers than for scrappers.
What stops you is the javascript puzzle, I agree it’s not worth it for the inconvenience but the idea is at least interesting
I just did. To allow screen readers which is what AI would do if this became a common block it uses this:
" Pressing it sets the reader’s browser to solving a compute-heavy puzzle: JavaScript and a few seconds of processing, more than most mass scrapers are willing to spend."
Which is exactly the method already addressed in the article: " requiring computationally expensive systems to access the content"
OK cool, thanks. What I saw in demos a week or so ago seemed “fuck those screen reader folks”. Would be good if it’s not as bad as that.