It’s likely Marge did the actual writing and let Homer take the credit.

https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gnome-to-have-stronger-dependency-on-systemd.98260/

Cousinizer.

It’s not the binary. It’s that the logs it writes are in binary so can’t be read without a program.

That’s the joy of open source though: you can stop it.

Not really. Unless you are prepared to devote your life to changing the source code to what you want, you have to accept it. And because you forked you are no longer downstream and will have to spend the rest of your life keeping up with patches.

It’s not much different than Windows. You could write a OneDrive uninstaller but you will have to spend the rest of your life with patches every time MS updates and breaks your uninstaller.

If your favorite thing is being ruined and you can’t stop it, I can understand frustration being displayed as anger.

It’s the same when Windows users get angry at things like OneDrive. It’s forced on them and they don’t want to have to work around removing it like people having to work around how Gnome is integrated into systemd.

Ok, I’ll capitalize the first letter and add an exclamation point to the end. Happy?

I bet brute force hash checkers assume the first letter is capitalized because of current password policies.

There are many legitimate complaints. Bundling a bunch of services into a single binary goes completely against Unix philosophy. Systemd changing from text to binary logs is my pet peeve.

Copying how Windows does things isn’t necessarily the best.

Yes all those features (compression is one of many ) are stupid, few if any actually use them, and it unnecessarily complicates everything.

I even hate edid. It keeps kvms from working.

I honestly don’t know what you are arguing about. If someone has $100 it is technically worth more than $100. If they give you that $100 you now have that $100 which is also technically worth more than $100. It’s the same $100 + unspecified future value either way.

If you argue the $8.4 trillion in net worth of Billionaires is worth more than the $8.4 T, then if that $8.4 was taken from them it is also worth more.

Display Port has fancy features like Display Stream Compression where the driver compresses the image going to the screen.

The solution would be for MS to move those features into Windows rather than allow manufacturers flexibility in implementation. MS would get bad publicity for monopoly and then have to deal with fixing Windows for every off brand monitor because the manufacturer didn’t follow the standard exactly.

What is it motivated by?

So it doesn’t change anything. You get $30k and yes that $30k is worth more because it can generate maybe $3k in investment income for you a year. It’s still only $30k.

The productive capacity of the accumulated capital owned by US billionaires exceeds $31k/person/year.

If that was true then taking all their capital and distributing it would be more than $31k/person/year for each individual receiving their share of the 8.4 Trillion.

Because baseline food and shelter is much more expensive in many cities where 80% of the population lives. That’s why minimum wage is $30k in major cities.

The UBI baseline is supposed to be $12000 per year. The premise is it covers food and shelter.

Oh no, I’m TOO old to recognize a meme for old people.

Minimum wage in many US cities is $15/hr which is $30k/year.

Even at federal minimum wage of $7.50, that means not just taxing Billionaires at 100% but taking everything will give you 2 years of UBI before there is no money.

Dramatically increasing debt and letting Democrats up the mess has been the consistent Republican strategy since Reagan.

How do you get UBI without issuing checks from the Treasury. There isn’t enough tax money that can be taken from Billionaires to sustain UBI.

Not just tax a percentage, but take every penny of every Billionaire in the US. Net worth of all US billionaires is 8.4 Trillion.

270 million US adults.

= 31k per person. Once.

That’s 31k one time. Then there is no money for next year.