• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    What is funny is that its not even better now compared to then. It used to be super fast and found everything on the web in an instant.

    And today, well, you know how Google search is…

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Google once stated that their primary goal was to get you off of Google property as quickly as possible- IE deliver your search result and get you where you want to go. That was the exact opposite of every other major website at the time (search engines, ‘portals’, etc) which wanted to keep you in.

      It’s what made Google great. They were laser focused on the best search experience.

      Now their search kinda sucks, it’s all AI and fuzzy logic and whatnot and even with quotes and Verbatim it STILL doesn’t just search for what I typed in not what you thought I wanted

  • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s what happens when companies go public. The ideals of the company go out the door and they care about is profits

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    become a monopoly by roleplaying as ethical and efficient

    fuck your userbase because they don’t have nearly as good alternatives

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yeah, that’s how the internet worked out. Everything started out awesome to attract huge numbers of users, then slowly started collecting more and more of our data to use and sell while ramming in more and more ads.

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I mean, I get it, servers cost money, traffic costs money.

    But there’s a little gray zone between going broke and sucking out every cent possible. Isn’t making enough money enough?

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Shareholders need ever increasing value or they will sell their shares. In the US at least, it is illegal to not provide shareholders with value. The only way to reliably get value is to fuck over your customers at every turn and fire half of your employees every few years

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Then you would still have private equity firms fucking everyone over, but with even less regulatory oversight.

          I think publicly traded companies should be nationalized under an independent and thoroughly-audited oversight body accountable to the taxpayers, and any profits generated should be distributed to fund public works, social services, welfare benefits, and civil sector orgs.

          And the idea of infinite growth needs to be abandoned entirely. These major internet companies need to be viewed as a public utility, and their goal should be to provide stable, reliable, quality services rather than churn an endless profit. This can only be done after nationalizing them though.

            • Photonic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The US can’t even ban elected officials from trading stocks. It has a president who openly brags about his own grift and nobody does a thing. I don’t think it’s going to happen soon…

    • tabris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In the word of Jim Stephanie Stirling, “They don’t just want a lot of money. They want all the money.”

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      When you’re a Trillion Dollar company, you don’t need MORE money. You make enough to make everything run without additional income.

      But obviously a trillion dollars is still not enough. We need more.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Google (www.google.com) is a pure search engine - no weather, no news feed, no links to sponsors, no ads, no distractions, no portal litter. Nothing but a fast-loading search site. For now. Give it a decade.

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I remember before ai I would just find what I needed with the.first link. Now I need to scroll past 3 ad links. Even duckduckgo has sponsored links.

    • libewa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Unlike Google, Lemmy (and Mastodon etc.) are FLOSS, so if one instance enshittifies, we can move, even to different ones, fediblock that instance, and continue on. This is the problem with Bluesky: You cannot (realistically) self-host all the ATProto infrastructure, or federate with anyone while not using some service from Bluesky.