• NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    First? Redhat.

    Used? Gentoo, Debian, Mepis, sidux, peppermint, mint, fedora, cachyos, puppy, damnsmall, evil entity, suse, opensuse, Slackware, arch, and who knows how many more.

    Using right now: Debian, fedora, cachyos, opensuse, Slackware. Different distro depending on need and device.

    Favorite? Real soft spot for mepis, it made it easy back in the day. Fedora right now: it always just works, there is nothing to do just update and move on. Also Debian. Because Debian.

    Worst: Ubuntu. Such a piece of crap, always breaking since first release.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 minutes ago

      TBH I have trouble telling why so many people in this thread complain about Ubuntu breaking, it always Just Works™ for me. Did they form their opinion around 2010, or are they using the six-monthly releases? I always used Ubuntu LTS (and never the default desktop).

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 minutes ago

        Started with their first release. So broken compared to everything else at that time.

        Now on new releases to this day it still throws weird errors or doesnt work as expected AT INSTALL. Usually reboots will fix some of those issues, sometimes I don’t even know if they are real issues, but it just shows Canonical doesnt make a very good product.

        Then sooner or later, with Canonical not able to keep an idea longer than 6 months, something else will break. Its just the Ubuntu way.

        Seems like their server version is better, I can’t really complain about it. I don’t have to interact with it much, but it behaves a lot better.

        Also, Xbuntu and Kbuntu somehow fared better than Ubuntu, much less problems.

  • ober@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago
    • Favorite: Gentoo
    • First Distro Used: Ubuntu
    • Distro You Want to Use in the Future: NixOS
    • Honorable Mention: Debian
    • Distro You Liked the Least: Ubuntu
    • Distro You Currently Use: Gentoo
    • The Distro You Used for the Longest Time: Gentoo
  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Favourite/Current Distro/Distro I’ve used the most: Arch btw.

    Distro liked the least: Ubuntu

    First Distro Used: Corel Linux (I am old lol)

    Honourable Mention: Pop!OS with the COSMIC desktop is pretty nice considering how new it is IMO.

    Future Distro: I’ve messed around with NixOS a bit and I kind of want to try it. I like to tinker a lot though so sometimes immutable OS-es kind of interfere with that.

  • joranm1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The first distro I used was SuSE (yes, before there was “Open” in the name 😅) on a Pentium III

    I spent many years on Arch, but it don’t think it’s the distro I used the most any longer…

    The distro I am using now is Fedora Workstation, which has been my daily driver for a dozen years now, and it’s also my favorite distro.

    The distro I’ll be using in the future may be Silverblue

    The distro I hate the most… is Ubuntu 😆 I had so many troubles over the years with this one, there was always something nonfunctional

    My honorable mention: CachyOS looks pretty nice 😉

    As for all the distros I tried… there’s way too many 😅

  • frostlytt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    favorite: chimera linux <3 currently using: gentoo least favorite: ubuntu

    ever since i tried to apt install firefox and was instead given the snap version without even being asked permission i gave up on ubuntu then and there

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Somewhat accurate for me, but I dabbled with Ubuntu, Debian and Alpine for my server so idk if that counts, otherwise my first distro was Arch but the distro I recommend to everyone as their first is Mint+Cinnamon, especially if they’re used to Windows

  • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    First: ubuntu favorite: nixos distro I like the least: ubuntu Distro I currently use: nixos distro I used for longest time: arch honorable mention: bazzite/aurora Distro I want to use in the future: redox with nixos

    i’m a recent nixos convert… I think once they improve the ux a bit it’s literally the best of all worlds. fantasic idea. UX and documentation issues take a lot of patience though… a lot.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Funny, Debian is the reason I came to Arch in the first place and never really left. I like Debian, but once you need more recent versions of something, things quickly get messy.

    My journey was: Ubuntu, Debian, ChrunchBang, ArchBang, Arch. Not a big fan of distro hopping, so I’ll probably stay like this or try Fedora if ever I want something non-rolling again.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    And take and red hat here then Slackware… It’s hard to believe you haven’t tried fedora.

    And if you like arch, try cachyos, it’s the same but with more compilation optimization: performance for free.

  • cybervegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Favorite: Debian Stable (For my uses, it was the least trouble)

    First: Slackware (1995, installed from floppy disks, also a short stretch in 2009)

    Current: Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE) (Using because I need to support users on stock Mint)

    Distro you liked the least: Novell SuSE (Used in a corporate setting)

    Distro you want to use in the future: Unknown

    Distro you used for the longest time: Debian Stable (15 years)

    Distro everyone likes but I don’t: Ubuntu

    Honorable mention: DietPi (RaspberryPi and SBC focused OS)

    Over time, I’ve used quite a lot of different distros: Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise, Scientific, CENTOS, Fedora, Mandrake, Damn Small, Puppy, CrashBang, Raspbian, Bazzite, to name just the ones I can remember off the top of my head now.

    • Mistiygirl@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      23 hours ago

      oh come on. I don’t ever say it outside of meme contexts. I just personally enjoy rolling releases and don’t really like the corporate feeling of Fedora, so i’m left with only really Arch as a good option.

      • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Just lighthearted poking, I don’t have anything bad to say about anyone’s choices. I didn’t mean any offense. Sorry if that was its tone.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fedora is corporate? I nearly spat my coffee ;-)

        I’m flashing back to working with suse on unitedlinux and the challenges we had. If you want a very Corporate distro, it’s right there.

        Never again.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            57 minutes ago

            Other way around mostly…

            Fedora trys stuff first.

            Funny that it’s not a rolling distro, yet it is often ahead of my cachyos box. It’s astounding how fast fedora puts stuff out yet never any effort on my part to manage it. Unlike cachy or even arch.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    OpenSUSE got me onto Linux and was such a great option for a first distro. I still think about changing back sometimes. I’m surprised it doesn’t get recommended more often.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      SUSE has always kind of been of an also ran in the eyes of a lot of users. I have tried the stable versions before Tumbleweed and I have even used Tumbleweed for a while. It’s a solid choice and the user base is awesome.

      I really, really, wanted to love SUSE, but there is just something about it that I just don’t vibe with. It’s a good distro and offers a lot. But it’s just a bit uncomfortable like a suit jacket that doesn’t quite fit right through the shoulders.

    • hobbit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      openSUSE Tumbleweed is my daily driver. I recommend it to most people. It’s a nice balance of leading edge and stability. Plus, snapper makes it easy to rollback if an update borks something.

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m always curious about what you all do with your OS 😅 I mean sure why not but for me it was (after 6 months before going for it) like a weekend check out and then my pc became an 'ol Linux box (boxes, laptops etc followed) and it just chugs on?

    • kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes! What is the appeal? Why switch all the time? I just install the OS, tweak everything to work, then let it be. I clearly am not enough of a nerd. My whole Linux adventure started with distros, that were said to be easy for beginners… and I did not move past that, because stuff works?

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 minutes ago

        I’ve hopped around a lot when I first got into Linux (mostly to check out different desktops, see what the fuss is about rolling releases, and trying to get a little more performance). Haven’t done any of that for about 5 years, I’m actually planning on moving from Ubuntu to Debian because of Canonical’s corporate bullshit, but there’s just too much annoying work to do to recreate my setup on a new install.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To be fair, some of these responses are clearly going back 20+ years and only have 8 total “hops”. In that time a typical windows user would have gone through 7-10 different versions of windows depending on how lucky they got with stuff like ME and 8…

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That seems like a very plausible explanation! I tried mint 16 and didn’t do the jump because it was not up to it just yet. Being a linux nerd 10-20 years ago and the differences were probably huge between distros, and they changed all the time too.

          Smart thinking!