• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m still counting this as a very broad win.

    The corruption is hilariously obvious now, they had no other choice.

    They’re afraid.

    Them being afraid, the lying and bullshit being undeniably obvious to anyone with ~+90 IQ, and there now being actual substantial public awareness and concern, and real organizations dedicated to combatting this corruption?

    Should have been that way a decade ago, but better late than never.

    • SteveNashFan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Boycotts don’t work when John Gamer spends hundreds of millions on microtransactions. I could never buy another EA Sports game for the rest of my life, and all it takes is one whale to wipe out ten of me boycotting. The economy of boycotting games is completely broken at scale when whales exist, and companies know how to cater to them.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Gamers are less capable of self-control than heroin addicts. Trying to get them to stop buying games is a fools errand.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          To this day I’ve still failed to talk my stepdad out of buying Madden games… even when they no longer work on Windows 10 (and of course Linux) so he’s having to upgrade… Sigh.

  • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Support for all games cannot last forever.”

    Again and again and again… Sigh… Sadly I’m sure many of the comission will just believe that shit…

    But then again, the big companies are obviously scared, that’s a good sign at least.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wrote a Python script that says “lol” last week.

      50 years from now, it’ll still be runnable, and it’ll still say “lol”.

      Unless I update it to say “Ubisoft sucks dick”.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you don’t update it to say “Ubisoft sucks dick,” you don’t support games!

  • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If I buy a physical board game, I can keep playing it as long as I still have the game in my possession. Video games should be no different.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, until their internal ram failed and you needed to do a full RPG in one sitting, but I guess that’s true of board games losing pieces or breaking.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          That is what archival copies and emulation exists to protect. In case your physical copy that you purchased becomes damaged and as a result is no longer usable, you still have the legal right to access the digital content you paid for. You have the legal right to make your own backup copies. You cannot distribute the copy, and are only entitled to one (at a time), and must destroy the copy if you sell or give away your physical copy. Basically the physical copy acts like a proof of purchase.

          Nintendo does not know the law and asserts their own creative interpretation is correct, but the letter of the law is very clear.

    • godsammitdam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Games (and software) are one of the few forms of media and free speech that are subject to this.

      Hence why streaming, e-books, etc come in to push in convenience while removing ownership/independence.

      I see it tangentially related in how it operates similar to fossil fuels/renewables. The industry wants you to keep buying. They can’t control the sun, wind, etc, so you don’t need to rely on them.

      Same kinda thing here, they want you to rely on them and keep buying the newest thing. And if they delete your old version, welp, guess you better come get the new one (especially when they “remaster” it with 0 effort and slap it on a new digital storefront.)

      I just hate the profit motive lol