You must log in or register to comment.
Hello 🐺
According to a friend of mine that went to this year’s rust week, while he was in a video conference with his thesis professor, he almost burst out laughing cause he heard someone meow behind him
I like pleonasms.
I want to read this book.
All I want is the Table of Contents, I feel like just that on its own would be enough of a laugh for me.
Chapter Nine: Guide to Furry Slang & Colloquialisms
“Everything you didn’t want to know about cheese graters, and knots the Boy Scouts will definitely not teach you.”I am both sad and happy that I have no idea what a cheese grater is in this context.
Consider yourself lucky you don’t have a clue about it. It’s just as cursed than the fabric sample fursuit, if not more.
Do you think this book will be able to explain the concept of a “closed species”?
patent trolling but made cool and edgy because it is applied to a group that has these properties (effectively training young generations from the start that ABSOLUTELY PROPRIETARY is very cool which in turn will blow up human collaboration and innovation)
Man I wish. We’re all bland flavor, non-furry, (supposedly) non gay, people at work.
Is there an advanced white paper that describes the baby fur to Nazi fur pipeline in relation to Elon Musk?
I was going to say that the animal on the cover ought to be a human, given that furries (et. al.) are animals of a sort, and what’s on the cover should be “opposite” somehow to the reader, but then I realised that the book is for someone who presumably isn’t a furry, and so the cover should indeed be some kind of animal.
The potential problem is that the animal should be entirely unrelated. The wolf (dog? canid?) is thus a bad choice because - from what little I’ve seen - canids seem to be pretty common preferences*. Thus it ideally should be an animal that it’s incredibly unlikely anyone would identify with. Or as.
Thus, may I suggest: a paramecium
* I’m not sure “preference” is the right word here. I may need a copy of this book.
from what little I’ve seen - canids seem to be pretty common preferences
https://furscience.com/research-findings/fursonas/3-1-species-popularity/
In an online study, we collected information on more than 6,000 distinct fursonas, which were categorized into 852 unique species (which were subsequently organized for ease of presentation.)2 Many of the species listed were unique and, as such, cannot be presented in order to preserve the anonymity of our participants. In the figures that follow, such species are aggregated in the “other” categories for the most relevant group.
First, we present the data for all species. We then proceed with a group-by-group breakdown of popular categories. Within each category, “unspecified” means that the species was simply identified as the category (e.g., within the “wolf” category analysis, “unspecified” refers to people who just put “wolf” rather than any specific breed/type of wolf).
Please note that this category breakdown is not meant to reflect biological taxonomy or cladistics, but is instead meant to be a close approximation of how groups of similar species “clustered” together (e.g., the authors know that a wolverine and a badger are not “rodents,” but included them in with “small furry mammals” for ease of analysis).
Hybrid is #1, at over 14%. Then Wolf, also a bit over 14%. Then Fox, a bit over 10%. Then Dog, at 9%. The only other non-other canid category is “canine”, at about half a percent.
So say on the order of half of the fandom at most, if you assume Hybrid and Other are mostly canine. Maybe as low as a third.
