

There’s a bit at the end of the article that might be counter to the RDP that it talks about, even if it is deliberately vague.
Some middle-aged guy on the Internet. Seen a lot of it, occasionally regurgitating it, trying to be amusing and informative.
Lurked Digg until v4. Commented on Reddit (same username) until it went full Musk.
Was on kbin.social (dying/dead) and kbin.run (mysteriously vanished). Now here on fedia.io.
Really hoping he hasn’t brought the jinx with him.
Other Adjectives: Neurodivergent; Nerd; Broken; British; Ally; Leftish


There’s a bit at the end of the article that might be counter to the RDP that it talks about, even if it is deliberately vague.


I dunno. There are some of us who run Mint not because we don’t know what we’re doing but because we do* and we don’t want to have to deal with any more nonsense than we absolutely have to.
From that small cohort, there are those of us who’ll frown when all we have open is a few browser tabs and the system’s using 8GB of RAM, twice the “recommended” spec. On startup with nothing running it’s over 1GB.
It’s hard not to see it as wasteful when you’re old enough to remember perfectly good machines running on single-digit megabytes. **
* Or at least, think we do.
** Yes, things are much more complex these days. But are they really a thousand times more complex?
There’s at least a couple of puns going on here. You may already know some of the following.
First of all, Perl is a programming language that has been around since the late '80s. It was designed as a system administrating, text processing glue language with aspects of shell scripting, awk, sed, the greps and a whole host of other things.
This is the first part of one of the puns. Perl was, and may still be, used as a filter in command line pipelines.
The other pun comes from the fact that perhaps the most important Perl book, Programming Perl was published by O’Reilly who generally put some sort of apparently unrelated animal on the cover of their titles. For Perl this was a camel.
Camel is, or was, a brand of cigarettes. Therefore this is the second pun. The pack of cigarettes has “Perl” where it should read “Camel” but still has the picture of a Camel, like both the book and the cigarettes.
Cigarattes, of course, often have filters on the mouth end of them, which completes the first pun. I do not know if any Camel cigarettes have these, but that’s not strictly important. Some cigarettes do. Perl-branded Camels almost certainly would do.
The third (fourth?) pun, which may or may not be intended, is that some people think that programming in Perl is damaging to one’s health.
Listen, I’m convinced the next kernel will finally fix the bug that in rare circumstances causes my potato to spontaneously mash itself and start whistling dixie.
… or maybe I’m confusing my potato with my brain again.
… aaas long your potato has a processor better than a 486 anyway.


I’d like to believe that this means that these three pieces of software actually work and that someone in high office has decided that that is unacceptable.
Paranoid authoritarians really do not like ordinary people having access to secure communications and personal privacy. That might be an avenue they can use to organise and elect someone who isn’t a paranoid authoritarian, and that won’t do.
On the other hand, these pieces of software might already be compromised and this is all an elaborate double-bluff.
In which case it’s time for a few well placed communications over purportedly secure channels that would be guaranteed to generate an authoritarian response. Which they’ll then have to pretend they didn’t read until it’s too late.
I’m talking organising - horrors - peaceful protests. They really don’t like those. They have to use their brains, or someone else’s, in order to find a good excuse to stick the boot in.


Neat. Don’t give them the ability to self-replicate and we’re golden.
nobody is fucking outside their species
Is this canon? They’re probably not having kids outside their species because that (probably) wouldn’t work (given the apparent lack of weird hybrids), but just plain copulation? Heck, we see that in the real world occasionally.
As for what the carnivores are eating, two possibilities present themselves: 1) The Disney Goofy / Pluto paradox is resolved by realising that one is more evolved than the other, and while they’re related species, they’re not the same species. The Zootopia world may have less evolved equivalents of the multiple sapient species, and they may be OK with eating them. 2) You don’t see any humans in their world. Does that mean they’re not there? Longpig is said to be delicious…
Pipewire is newer and emulates PulseAudio so that it can be used as a drop-in replacement. There’s literally a command called pipewire-pulse related to this.
It makes me wonder if they really have both installed or are mistaking Pipewire’s emulation for an active PulseAudio installation, and so it’s just Pipewire that’s acting up.
I’d say reboot, but being in space might be one of those times where that’s a non-starter. In which case, they’re going to have to get their hands dirty unpicking system hooks and trying to reattach them all again as and when Pipewire’s working again, assuming it doesn’t do that automatically.
I never had a problem with either Pipewire or real PulseAudio back when that was current. I had motherboard sound physically pop, requiring the purchase of a separate sound card, but never a driver issue, so I can’t even imagine what might be going on.
I never had screen tearing with NVIDIA under Mint, but for AMD I found that something needs to be added to the Xorg configuration to turn screen tearing off.
I suspect the default is so as not to limit the graphics in any way, but I can’t imagine the majority of users want it that way around, so I’m a little confused by that choice.
This website has instructions on how to fix it for Ubuntu, but I can confirm it works in LMDE too, so I assume it works across the Debian family if not elsewhere: https://davejansen.com/quick-how-to-fix-screen-tearing-in-ubuntu-with-amd-gpus/
I’m going to assume you’re not kidding, in which case, no, I mean the first letter of the command name it was called by.
There are already commands that do this. For example, on my machine, ex is the head of a symlink chain that leads to the vim text editor’s executable and if I run ex, vim will know that it was started with the name ex and will start in ex mode. ex was an editor that worked in a different way but was vim’s ancestor, so backwards compatibility is built right in for those strange people who love ex, (or have some kind of automation reliance on it being present).
Usually, the main command has a command line option that achieves the same effect as the special name. Here, vim -e is the less clever way to start vim in ex mode.
For yes, symlinking the name no to it and then calling that should arguably cause it to print n repeatedly, but it doesn’t, for historical reasons, hence my suggestion to go back in time and make it act differently.
(None of this touches on the fact that the GNU philosophy wants nothing to do with clever tricks like this. They prefer to compile separate executables for each and every use case. For example, most Linuxes have dir and vdir as variants of the ls command. Their functionality could have been implemented through this symlink trick, but instead there are three near-identical executables taking up space instead.)


Part hubris, part greed. They believe their own hype and either think that other people will believe it too or that they can force it on the unbelievers, thus leading to great profit.
Where is the profit? Enforced cloud accounts and storage mean users’ information is permanently held ransom, and users shall pay monthly to retain access to it.
They can also pick through users’ files and sell that information to data brokers and advertisers, if not also various government intelligence agencies.
Actually that last one is more about the continued ability to go on bleeding users dry, but it amounts to the same thing.


The two commands are not equivalent. sed 11q prints 11 lines whereas head’s default is 10.
Personally I would prefer head -11 in this situation as it more clearly indicates, for the sake of the meme, that something is being removed from the head.
There’s also that head seems to be ever-so-slightly quicker, perhaps proving what we already knew about thinking being quicker than speech.
TL;DR That’s what she sed?
The BeOS command line command set were all borrowed from or based upon Unix and/or Linux (IIRC many were straight from GNU), which is the basis for my comparison.
The kernel and graphics were all from-scratch and radically different from Linux, sure, but the same could be said of Linux when compared to the original Unix, or any of the BSDs.
Haiku is what grew out of the ashes of BeOS. And if you’ve never heard of that, you’re no worse off. It was another Unix-alike that was neither Linux nor BSD which showed early promise but didn’t gain enough traction.


That just means that the lowly, customer-facing peons that work for government offices don’t have access to any such master database.
Most people work for companies that hold information inaccessible to them. Other government databases would definitely be on that list.


You mean to tell me that such a database doesn’t already exist?


Sometimes the only real options are “bad” and “less bad”. An uncomfortable echo of something else we’re all familiar with, perhaps.
This does not mean that we should not criticise the less bad option, only that we should not switch to the the bad option.


Black and white 80x25 BIOS text screen with the IBM PC ROM font, not unlike the MS-DOS it sought to replace.
Everything else is fluff on top of that, possibly occupying different graphics planes available in whatever hardware is available.
Yes, technically modern PCs and Linux have moved beyond that 80x25 screen for the most part, but its immediate descendant is still in use, often during boot, but also on Ctrl-Alt-F[1-6] on many distros.
I seem to remember hearing about a town that installed cameras to
spy on citizensmonitor for crime and took them all down again when a judge enforced freedom of information legislation. That is, the public requested access to what the cameras recorded and were found to be entitled to it.It’s not true that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, but the converse is true. And dirty cops reeeally don’t like it.