• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It’s going to be really, really frustrating watching Democrats campaign in support of AI companies this fall.

    But this is a good reminder. Your only power now is local, so take an interest in your neighborhood and fight for it.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      What happens when they get built anyway. Would it be legal to burn them down.

      Because a lot places voters voted to not allow them and they get built anyway.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        It won’t ever be legal, but I don’t think that’s going to matter. These data centers are threatening hundreds of communities’ basic survival, and there are so many people in this country that are struggling and ready to snap.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      7 hours ago

      So the 280-300 in the state currently that do nice things like let the internet happen, let 911 calls go through, allow universities do research on diseases, hold cancer patient records, and show California residents Lemmy should…what? Go away?

      An absolutist view of anything is typically a terrible idea. You don’t even know which very specific class of large data center you are “against.”

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        Pretty sure the user is talking specifically about AI data centers. We could even be more precise and say LLM datacenters.

        I haven’t read the article so I don’t know if the legislation makes a distinction. If not, it should. But a state-wide ban on LLM datacenters is a good idea. A nationwide ban on them would be a good idea, if it were politically feasible at this time.

        Not only is it a bubble economy based on pure speculation, and doomed to collapse catastrophically at some point, as well as putting a pinch on critical supply chains such as for compute hardware, but California has areas that are facing water shortages and they certainly don’t need big tech building giant new data centers that will hog all this water for cooling while polluting what’s left.

        Not to mention global warming and society’s outdated reliance on fossil fuels making these giant computers a terrible idea. Not only does it make electricity more expensive for residential consumers, while increasing the amount of fossil fuels being burned and the CO2 being put into the atmosphere, but the computer hardware alone creates so much heat that it has a measurable effect on the temperature of the area around it.

        I could go on. There’s lots of reasons to be opposed to new LLM datacenters. And it seems kinda disingenuous to deflect by categorizing them with every other kind of datacenter. Those other kinds of datacenters aren’t the ones people are talking about.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        Keeping them out of residential areas and limiting their impact on municipal utilities seems prudent.

        Trying to evade regulations by hiding it in a subdivision isnt cool.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Well I then I guess tech bros should stop fucking around if they don’t want to find out what an enraged Luddite’s sabo taste like.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a classic knee jerk from commenters who don’t know what they are talking about.

        A tale as old as time.

            • hansolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Fun fact: data centers existed and were incredibly important pieces of digital infrastructure long before LLMs were publicly available. You don’t even know what a data center does apparently.

              Nor do you realize that my comment isn’t about the virtues of data centers or what happens in them, but rather, having a massively under-informed opinion based largely on emotions. Hate for the sake of hate. That’s what MAGA people do. You’re really doing to double down and tell me that “oh, well, not me, I’m not like that” with a straight face?

              Downvote all you like, it doesn’t make your heart kind, or your mind work better.

              • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                46 minutes ago

                Yeah, but the scale of the current set of data centers has gotten to a point where they are becoming a problem for the communities they inhabit. If data centers stayed at the consumption levels they did decades ago, I don’t think we’d be seeing organized political action against them.

              • bthest@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                We actually have very good reasons to be telling society destroying tech speculators to take their “but muh inovashions” “diruptions bro” and fuck off and die in a slit trench.

                • hansolo@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  50 minutes ago

                  But you do realize that un-innovative, plain old data centers not for bots and AI are a thing, right?

                  You literally can’t throw your opinion at me without them.

        • hansolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          lol, I see I struck a cord ;)

          Tell me how many data centers existed in the world in 2016. Then tell me how many ran LLMs. Then if you give me a pie chart of what those 2016 data centers were used for, I might mail you a cherry pie. (warning, it will get smashed and gross and spoil before it gets to you)

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    wonder if that will change if Xavier becomes the next governor since hes a full on DINO corporate shill,.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Sadly the alternatives aren’t any better. Rather they are objectively worse.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        Found the becerra voter. Steyer is unquestionably better. All I ever hear from haters is that he’s a billionaire but if you ever look at their policies and debates then you’ll see he outright wins

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          Counterpoint: billionaires are proven liars and the scum of the earth so anything said during a debate is about as reliable as wet toilet paper.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Good they should go where there’s cheaper land value and the water flows downstream from where I live! Also any traffic needed for construction should be diverted to the point it doesn’t affect my day to day.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    65
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Its crazy how radicalized Americans have gotten towards Data centers. Very inorganic in my opinion.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      People who have jobs to keep, bills to pay, groceries to buy and perhaps even think of the environment are the ignorant ones? Okay buddy. 👌

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They are without a doubt out of their realm of expertise and to busy to look into anything.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I suspect you read “inorganic” as “ignorant”. What GP is saying is þey believe it’s not grass-roots activism.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sure, but their point still stands. You can easily make the argument that the backlash against AI and datacenters is specifically driven by people with

          jobs to keep, bills to pay, groceries to buy and perhaps even think of the environment

          And I don’t see how the backlash is inorganic. You have a new tech being shoved down peoples’ throats that is dog shit at most tasks and passable at some, which is being used to justify layoffs, make workers that keep their jobs work harder, drives up electricity costs, made computer parts unreasonably expensive, uses stupid amounts of power and water to train and outright takes any digital data not nailed down to increase the training data so it can generate shit like revenge porn, deep fakes and CSAM on major social media sites.

          If anything, I’m honestly surprised the backlash isn’t stronger and more widespread. But given the politicians this country is electing, I can only assume it’s because a large fraction of us are dumber than fucking bricks and brainlessly parrot anything their media daddies tell them.

    • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      A very specific type of data center called a scaleable private data center – mainly used by one entity, one private purpose, designed to be infinity sized-up. Not to be confused with other valuable purposed data centers. Some examples include…

      • telecommunications public sector (911, gov’t, schools, local tv & radio)
      • telecommunications private sector (global phone, tv, radio, satellite uplinks)
      • internet services (aws, cdn, db, backends)

      You can generally tell which is which. A properly planned civil infrastructure takes years or decades to plan. The other is a rush “fly-by-night” build.

    • RandomStranger@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why? Almost all large constructions with local impact has some NIMBY movement. In addition, all these datacenters are ultimately backed by the Epstein-class with the end game to replace you. Action on the national level may be lost, but on the local level things can still be done.

      • Osan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        In the long run I don’t think it would matter that much. They would just move it elsewhere potentially in someone’s else backyard but the infrastructure will still run by you and the effects/consequences are still the same. A nice looking backyard doesn’t matter when everything around it is on fire.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        7 hours ago

        For every 1 of me there is 20 of you getting rage baited by misinformation.