• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 hours ago

    One notable exception: temperature ranges for electronics. The electronics may be shit, but they will still work when the soldier is an ice popsicle or a roasted piece of meat.

    • TomMasz@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This describes most of the Internet. Which, naturally, was a orginally a (D)ARPA project.

      • scytale@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Unfortunately in this case meets requirements just means it ticks a box. The meme is talking about people thinking military grade is top of the line. Like how the cheapest tire you can buy is legal and meets regulations, but it doesn’t mean it’s good.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          The same way building contractors advertise their work with “everything built to code”. Yeah, building code is the bare minimum requirement for something to be legally put on the market. Building to code isn’t a brag. It’s saying “we do everything as cheaply as possible. If we cut any more corners, the house would literally be illegal to sell.”

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s more like “meets” requirements

        And usually it’s specifically functional requirements. Unless it was spelled out, it was considered and or was designed out / shitty to save cash

  • TheMuffinMan@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As someone who works in defence & surveillance as a systems engineer (so by every measure a civilian), I’m still the one on the right… military grade hardware is a fucking nightmare to integrate into larger systems.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not Pixar, it’s Disney.

      Pixar got its animation start when John Lasseter got fired from Disney for promoting CG animation over the traditional hand-drawn animation. He moved over to the Lucasfilm CG studio, which was later renamed “Pixar.”

      Through Pixar (after Steve Jobs bought it from George Lucas), Lasseter and his team proceeded to not only revolutionize CG animation, but to create incredible unique stories with it. They were seen as a real competitor to Disney for a while. They only started making sequels when they started collaborating with Disney.

      Eventually, Disney realized the money to be made from CG animation, so they bought out Pixar. Now it’s a Disney product and their ideas are bankrupt once again. We don’t get original stories anymore, just a bunch of unnecessary sequels and garbage films that were probably written by AI.