• zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s not AI that’s the problem. AI is an amazingly powerful tool (I’m an AI researcher).

    The problem is that it’s in the hands of psychotic technofascist greedy subhumans that want to destroy basically all of society so their stock can go up 0.001%. If we can cut out the source of the cancer, the body can begin to heal itself.

    • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Right! If you don’t count the mass surveillance boost, the autonomous killing machines they’re trying to make, the environmental impact, the pillaging of our individual experiences, and the destruction of all our shared spaces online, AI is a pretty cool tool.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The lack of regulation of AI is absolutely a serious problem, there are so many problems your comment isn’t even funny.
      Problems with people using it for health advice.
      Problems with teens using it instead of friends.
      Problems with AI giving absurdly incorrect advice to people in general, but also professionals like managers and CEO’s.
      Problems with data-centers that host these AI systems require enormous amounts of power. So much researchers have shown these data centers are drying up vast areas around the centers.

      The techno-fascists are in all sorts of business, that’s not special for AI. The problem is with AI the techno-fascists aren’t regulated in any way.
      Neither how their data centers impact the environment and the electric grid, or how AI has actual bad effects for their customers, because there is no regulation on the use or supply of AI services.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I was excited about the idea of purpose-built systems trained on specific datasets to be help find complex patterns to diagnose diseases or suggest potential molecules for specific purposes.

      Then the LLM shit started and everyone started fantasizing about intelligent “AI” just because it was able to reproduce patterns of language that seem relevant to a given input. Some of those funding it kept chasing that dream and are convinced that, if they just throw more compute at the problem, they can evolve the renaissance AGI that can do anything. Then they can fire every worker and be bazillionaires with robot slaves and never have to work another day of their lives… and fuck everyone and everything else.

      It’s amazing what we can ruin when we let greed and selfishness drive our society.

      • roux2scour@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        At 1million i could already stop working and live decent life :/. I really don’t get why past 1billion they continue to search for more

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          58 minutes ago

          Maybe it’s because I’ve only ever had at most a comfortable income but I truly don’t understand the mentality of needing so much money.

          I don’t get paid as much as my peers but I make enough to be comfortable. I am my own department and, aside from emergencies and other high priority situations, I manage myself and choose what to work on when. I have a decent work life balance. Because I make enough to be comfortable (in large part because my landlord promised not to raise our rent - early in the COVID lockdown - if we were “good tenants” and has managed to keep true to her word) I don’t feel the need for more. That balance is worth not making the 20% more a year I might get somewhere else because I can’t guarantee I won’t have a shitty boss that doesn’t let me have that work/life balance.

    • ace_garp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Indeed.

      To cut off their data and revenue streams, stick to Open Source, locally run, models and chatbots.

    • ag10n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s amazing how open source has benefitted the individual. The monopolization of compute is still a barrier we’ll have to crash through

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s always been that way, it’s just that until now the general public could say “well at least they pay me.”

      So ironically this rise in anxiety is itself being driven by self-interest. People were fine with those people being in charge as long as they got a comfortable lifestyle out of it. A pattern seen throughout history.