• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m so tired of every job posting frothing at the mouth over AI. “We’re ai native” , “we want employees who are excited about ai tools”, “agenic workflows”

    Just fuck off.

    Even if all of this stuff was a real productivity increase, who is keeping that extra production? Not the workers!

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Because they’re blatantly using it to try and enslave us?

    Like, not even metaphorically.

  • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    People find AI to be irritating because of its flaws and failure to deliver. They are also angry about big tech suggesting that AI will force real humans out of human spaces. The arts, media, research, science, the work force etc.

    The “anxiety” is mostly fear of exactly what’s being promised at the detriment of the people expected to fund it. Anyone who’s got eyes and ears knows that the venture capital well will run dry eventually.

    There is no return on investment for the vast majority of regular every day humans living in this world at this time. Not where AI is concerned. It isn’t hard to follow what is being marketed to its conclusion. Tech Oligarchs have been saying the quiet part out loud since the begining.

    AI will replace workers. AI will replace people who make art and music, and write things. AI will replace.

    They even tell us they know it’s a flawed replacement that they can’t make better. And they pretty much tell us that they haven’t found a way to monetize it so it’s sustainable which basically means one way or another they will be looking for people to pay more for it.

    People have started thinking about what that means and naturally they don’t like it. Tech Bros are selling this dream of replacing us but we don’t have any money to pay more for a product that doesn’t produce anything worthwhile for the cost. Especially not if you’re replacing them and there is no safety net.

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s often a tacit acknowledgment to the poor quality of AI output, but that they do not care, the strategy is to flood the zone with so much garbage as to make it irrelevant. It’s a grift-conomy mindset, the focus is on “velocity” and “productivity” to the detriment of all else.

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s not AI that’s the problem. AI is an amazingly powerful tool (I’m an AI researcher).

    The problem is that it’s in the hands of psychotic technofascist greedy subhumans that want to destroy basically all of society so their stock can go up 0.001%. If we can cut out the source of the cancer, the body can begin to heal itself.

    • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Right! If you don’t count the mass surveillance boost, the autonomous killing machines they’re trying to make, the environmental impact, the pillaging of our individual experiences, and the destruction of all our shared spaces online, AI is a pretty cool tool.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The lack of regulation of AI is absolutely a serious problem, there are so many problems your comment isn’t even funny.
      Problems with people using it for health advice.
      Problems with teens using it instead of friends.
      Problems with AI giving absurdly incorrect advice to people in general, but also professionals like managers and CEO’s.
      Problems with data-centers that host these AI systems require enormous amounts of power. So much researchers have shown these data centers are drying up vast areas around the centers.

      The techno-fascists are in all sorts of business, that’s not special for AI. The problem is with AI the techno-fascists aren’t regulated in any way.
      Neither how their data centers impact the environment and the electric grid, or how AI has actual bad effects for their customers, because there is no regulation on the use or supply of AI services.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I was excited about the idea of purpose-built systems trained on specific datasets to be help find complex patterns to diagnose diseases or suggest potential molecules for specific purposes.

      Then the LLM shit started and everyone started fantasizing about intelligent “AI” just because it was able to reproduce patterns of language that seem relevant to a given input. Some of those funding it kept chasing that dream and are convinced that, if they just throw more compute at the problem, they can evolve the renaissance AGI that can do anything. Then they can fire every worker and be bazillionaires with robot slaves and never have to work another day of their lives… and fuck everyone and everything else.

      It’s amazing what we can ruin when we let greed and selfishness drive our society.

      • roux2scour@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        At 1million i could already stop working and live decent life :/. I really don’t get why past 1billion they continue to search for more

    • ace_garp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Indeed.

      To cut off their data and revenue streams, stick to Open Source, locally run, models and chatbots.

    • ag10n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s amazing how open source has benefitted the individual. The monopolization of compute is still a barrier we’ll have to crash through

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s always been that way, it’s just that until now the general public could say “well at least they pay me.”

      So ironically this rise in anxiety is itself being driven by self-interest. People were fine with those people being in charge as long as they got a comfortable lifestyle out of it. A pattern seen throughout history.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    For who is it growing? Is it the same people that use AI to “discuss” personal problems because the AI is always nice to them? (yes this is really a thing, especially with young people).
    Or people who use AI to be “creative”?
    Or the people that use AI to seek health advice?

    There are many good reasons to worry about AI, but my guess is that most the people that worry, do it for the wrong reasons.
    Apart from the bad advice, and annoying AI customer services, and possibly taking jobs and potentially being a danger to humanity because leaders trust the AI. There may be a much closer and more imminent danger.

    The movie “Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die” seemed a bit stupid when I first saw it, but goddam the movie has a point, that’s how it’s actually turning out for some people. They choose to live with an AI generated fantasy, created specifically to make them feel good!! A fantasy where they are always right, and are amazing artists, and where the AI is a better “friend” than actual friends.
    I predict that AI will be worse than any cult in taking away family and friends.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1341338/