That’s the entire joke, at least seen from the man’s side.
These femcels actually believe that they are involuntarily celibate, when it actually comes 100% down to them not wanting the lower-90% of men in any capacity except as simps to do things for them and beta orbiters to maintain their egos.
That doesn’t make them involuntarily celibate in any way, shape, or form, it just makes them deeply delusional of their own value, and horrendously self-sabotaging.
Honestly, the hate and gender bigotry coming out of those communities make male incels look like rank amateurs. Men are so wildly behind the curve - compared to women - where gender bigotry is concerned that I’m shocked that men are even considered a problem, much less the problem.
I mean, when was the last time you heard of men advocating to kill all women except for a small, select breeding population who exists purely to keep the population maintained?
And yet, this is the fave philosophy of several of feminism’s greatest founders and writers - to bring the male population down to (depending on who is doing the advocating) either less than 1% of the population, or even lower. That men’s only purpose should be for sperm production, and so vanishingly few men would ever be needed except as a minimum level of genetic diversity. These women are lauded and widely celebrated by feminists everywhere.
Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re arguing in good faith for one more comment.
These femcels _actually believe_ that they are _involuntarily_ celibate, when it actually comes 100% down to them not wanting the lower-90% of men in any capacity except as simps to do things for them and beta orbiters to maintain their egos.
Can we agree that this comment is misogynistic on its face?
It managed to be pretty insulting to men at the same time, so I guess that’s a defense, of sorts.
Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.
If you have a problem with feminism, have a problem with actual feminism, actual feminists and actual mainstream feminist arguments. Instead of cherry-picking 3 dead women and misrepresenting them, start here instead: https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/what-is-feminism
You aren’t the tail which wags the dog in feminist circles. The man-hating gender bigots who lead all these feminist organizations are the ones who control the narrative. The more hateful, spiteful, and extreme they are, the more they get celebrated as role models for young women.
All I can say is that feminism is not a monolith. It is an incredibly fragmented ideology. There is only one thing you could honestly say that every feminist in the world 100% agrees on, and that is that sexism is bad.
I have read precisely one book about feminism, and that book is The Will to Change by bell hooks. She is maybe the most influential feminist of the 21st century. In the book she writes that hating men is bad and that it hurts the movement. She also had an incredibly simple definition of feminism: sexism is bad and we should stop it. I wonder why she is so popular.
Anyway, yeah, all that shit in your links is awful. Its also incredibly fucking fringe, and the feminist circles you’re referring to are not representative of the broader feminist movement. Your take here is nuclear, as in it’s radioactive. You couldn’t be worse at attacking feminism dude.
Anyway this conversation isn’t going anywhere so imma head out
That’s the entire joke, at least seen from the man’s side.
These femcels actually believe that they are involuntarily celibate, when it actually comes 100% down to them not wanting the lower-90% of men in any capacity except as simps to do things for them and beta orbiters to maintain their egos.
That doesn’t make them involuntarily celibate in any way, shape, or form, it just makes them deeply delusional of their own value, and horrendously self-sabotaging.
Honestly, the hate and gender bigotry coming out of those communities make male incels look like rank amateurs. Men are so wildly behind the curve - compared to women - where gender bigotry is concerned that I’m shocked that men are even considered a problem, much less the problem.
I mean, when was the last time you heard of men advocating to kill all women except for a small, select breeding population who exists purely to keep the population maintained?
And yet, this is the fave philosophy of several of feminism’s greatest founders and writers - to bring the male population down to (depending on who is doing the advocating) either less than 1% of the population, or even lower. That men’s only purpose should be for sperm production, and so vanishingly few men would ever be needed except as a minimum level of genetic diversity. These women are lauded and widely celebrated by feminists everywhere.
You literally cannot make this shit up.
Except I don’t have to. Plenty of women have blazed this path.
Most prominently:
With plenty more waiting in the wings.
Finally,
https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1gtjhrv/debunking_feminists_help_men_too_lie/
Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.
Yikes
That link? Absolutely yikes. Vanishingly few people understand how virulently misandrist feminism is.
And those authors make the worst incel out there look like a rank amateur.
Nobody ever accused you of having to spew a bunch of bullshit, misogynistic misinformation.
I gave you the names of three prominent feminist authors who worried about exactly that subject, and you are still calling bullshit?
You are really mired in anti-reality, and blind to real-world facts.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re arguing in good faith for one more comment.
Can we agree that this comment is misogynistic on its face?
It managed to be pretty insulting to men at the same time, so I guess that’s a defense, of sorts.
It appears to be your take on it.
Beta orbiters, not wanting “lower 90% of men” and other shit is 100% redpill code talk btw. They’re either an incel or an idiot.
what a sad way to go through life.
Yes, being obsessed with reality and those pesky facts and evidence is just so sad.
Idk funny meme are funny
You literally can.
Except I don’t have to. Plenty of women have blazed this path.
Most prominently:
With plenty more waiting in the wings.
Finally,
https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1gtjhrv/debunking_feminists_help_men_too_lie/
Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.
If you have a problem with feminism, have a problem with actual feminism, actual feminists and actual mainstream feminist arguments. Instead of cherry-picking 3 dead women and misrepresenting them, start here instead: https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/what-is-feminism
I wouldn’t say the feminists I know believe any of that stuff. Most of them are focused on poverty and rape and how those things affect women.
I think you need to read this.
You aren’t the tail which wags the dog in feminist circles. The man-hating gender bigots who lead all these feminist organizations are the ones who control the narrative. The more hateful, spiteful, and extreme they are, the more they get celebrated as role models for young women.
All I can say is that feminism is not a monolith. It is an incredibly fragmented ideology. There is only one thing you could honestly say that every feminist in the world 100% agrees on, and that is that sexism is bad.
I have read precisely one book about feminism, and that book is The Will to Change by bell hooks. She is maybe the most influential feminist of the 21st century. In the book she writes that hating men is bad and that it hurts the movement. She also had an incredibly simple definition of feminism: sexism is bad and we should stop it. I wonder why she is so popular.
Anyway, yeah, all that shit in your links is awful. Its also incredibly fucking fringe, and the feminist circles you’re referring to are not representative of the broader feminist movement. Your take here is nuclear, as in it’s radioactive. You couldn’t be worse at attacking feminism dude.
Anyway this conversation isn’t going anywhere so imma head out
Their other comment are full of TRP coded talk. Very unlikely this person is presenting these views in good faith just fyi.
I didn’t opt into this world and won’t be opted out by some moron either. I have mine, and anyone who does not respect that, can eat lead.
I neither care about them, nor bother them, nor am interested in them, so they better not get any ideas.