• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s such a nonsense argument. 80% of the US lives in an urban area. That has plenty of options for walkable neighborhoods with public transportation. The reason that those don’t exist are active policy choices that people have voted for and keep voting for.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Have you even been to the US? Even most of the urban areas have horrible public transit and even worse infrastructure for biking.

      Maybe get off your high horse and engage in reality.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Maybe vote for somebody who will give you better public transport and cycling infrastructure.

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I think that’s exactly what that person is saying though. There is plenty of opportunity for good public infrastructure, but bad policy and auto lobbies have prevented them from happening. A good example is how most neighborhoods are not allowed to be located with businesses/shops/restaurants, and vice versa. This simple change would make so much more of the country more walkable

        • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          55 minutes ago

          The shitty thing is before WW2, America had some of the best public and most profitable transportation infrastructure in the world. American railroad tycoons were some of the most wealthy individuals in the nation for a time even and before that it was steamboat tycoons. As you say auto lobbyist ruined it all unfortunately and AmTrak is a sad excuse of what’s left.