• zerofk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    The original article mentions the sabotaging only as historical evidence for a trend of pushing its tech onto people. It is not saying Microsoft is currently doing it specifically to sabotage anyone. Bullshit title.

    The original article also mentions several things as fact that are not, and omits other facts, but that’s a different discussion.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Mozilla are perfectly capable of sabotaging themselves, thank you.

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      To be fair, they edited in the Microslop logo and also the Firefox icon, making a crying fox look like a narcissist hugging it’s own image, that is not completely out of blue with their recent shitty decisions

  • garbage_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Microsoft hasn’t done anything wrong. Windows is a proprietary software and they can do whatever they want

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “You’re on my property, I’m allowed to shoot you here.”

      While these “ethics” do exist, they’re extremely niche. So don’t pretend yours aren’t.

      • garbage_world@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Alternatives exist.

        If you use Windows, you agreed to the TOS.

        Don’t use it if you don’t like it.

        • IratePirate@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 minutes ago

          Personally, I don’t.

          But not everyone is able to (for lack of awareness to alternatives, technical skills, software constraints, work requirements, vendor lock-in, …). Are those people unworthy of being protected from an evil company’s wrongdoing just because they’re using the “wrong” OS?

          You’re basically arguing that corporations can do whatever they please “on their own turf”. That’s not true as far as user rights, consumer protection and anti-trust laws are concerned. And it shouldn’t be.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Windows forcing their own propriatary software as a means to destroy competing web browsers? Is it 1997 already?

  • Tharkys@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think Microslop really needs to sabotage Firefox. Firefox is doing a really good job of shooting their own selves in the foot.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Mozilla could have had a foothold but they literally added AI into Firefox, so idk how far they’re gonna get.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It defaults to local models only from what I know. You probably are responding from a device that uses embedded models already. If you are against technology how are you responding?

      • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        FR. These features are so easy to disable, when I updated Firefox recently it asked me on next load if I want the features or not… I chose not, no big deal!

        ‘AI’ is this generations Justin Bieber / Skrillex. There’s plenty to criticise but it’s becoming a bandwagon at this point.