I think thats what the strawberries mentioned are referring to

Mine looks nothing like me but even my partner says it would be weird if i ever changed it. It really is part of my identity now.

You got it wrong like me. You wake up in the body of your character, not their world.

Edit: i just realised you wake up in the body, not the world. Too bad, i put to much effort in it now.

How am i going to play Minecraft without fingers?

The proportions are decent, the handwriting is solid and consistent. Very clean and readable presentation.

If you have kids it becomes really obvious when a drawing is “childlike” vs “from a child”

I remember rumours at school that the strawberry flavour could get you instant addicted.

I doubt that is true, but I considered it a positive that people were worried about it.

Then the modern vape cartridge got invented and just like that the youth is back to paying companies to inhale poison.

Not sure what the context is to warrant this reaction. I am not part of the anti-everything-ai mob.

I fully agree on both points. Llms are here to stay and people need to learn to use them.

That said: “please check the output before you hand it out” seems like such a basic minimum.

i am actually shocked that usually smart people, including school teachers. Don’t practice this minimum of quality control.

But this wasn’t a teacher, this was “the administration” a plural of people of which any could and should have done this minimum.

At that point just hand out empty notebook instead. Its would actually be useable. It would be way less damaging to the image of the school. A School that cant write legible text in officials documents isn’t worth sending my kids too.

That is definitely the issue. And this problem is only ramping up in almost all fields.

https://www.wdrb.com/news/venecky-instead-of-kentucky-jcps-middle-school-parents-suspect-school-agendas-are-ai-generated/article_c0d3bef9-bda3-454b-8606-9cf3c5a6178d.html

I think the effect is caused because if you look you see the context and in your head segment what is going on into different parts for your brains to analyze.

The gif is quite fast so i actually think its more that paying attention makes you take in mode detail. Make it make overal seem slowerx

When you look away you lose detail to know what part is on screen. You just see it flash/cycle between them.

The harder you start analysing it, like the autist that i am, the more the brain seems to catch up and is able to measure a more subjective time.

The majority of games made by the gaming industry exist purely to create profit.

This is not the artist and developers fault, they are still passionate but their hands are tied to executive whims.

It’s genuinely almost all shit. The only good games left are indie games and older gems.

Honestly way cheaper and not requiring the latest hardware either.

I wasn’t in this picture till you mentioned this.

Were not meant to feel sorry for this person.

This is not an emotion triggering article. Its a n information warning.

The apps some use to send private messages can call the cops on you if an ai gets context wrong. Kinda a big deal.

We have been the steampunk universe all along!

The question i have,

The image is digital when it is uploaded. There is a fixed assortiment of pixels only differentiated by the contrast of shades of grey.

The instructions say to colorise.

In my head this means every pixel needs to obtain a color value, while still matching contrast with pixels around it.

What ai does instead is provide an entirely newly constructed image made up from entirely new pixels which show “google deepdream” patterns.

This is from the final result where the author was “happier” with the result and asked what i assume is an llm to not invent information that isn’t there. (Zoom in)

This is not what i would call a colorisation, it’s a colorised re-creation. I imagine a real colorisation as simply a layer of color values that combine with the exact pixels of the digital scan. Disabling that layer (using photo software) should return the exact digital original and turning the final colorisation into a black and white filter should still leave it nearly identical to the original. Anything else is a recreation for fun and fantasy purposes only.

To vent, i am so glad we convinced someone in the family not to use the “ai enhanced” version for a loved ones official funeral picture.

Actually!!

The litter of roombas is rather untidy but assuming they are themselves clean (taken out of the box just for this skit) then the room is not unclean because of their chaos.

I took it as a non serious joke riffing of a common meme.

The message isn’t but

“US Law Enforcement terrorise and kill innocent civilian(s)” sadly is.

I am sorry but It actually kinda looks to me like an ai generated advertisement for this persons book. The adapted from makes me think its not the original text which genuinely feels uncanny and convoluted like ai does.

Are we sure this person is directly involved or was ai generated self authored articles part of the small print of a advertisement contract.

Or are we sure that their qualifications make them really immune to make use of ai like this.

It’s a genuine very good youtube series that is rivalling industrial production quality and popularity, i am just using it as a very twisted example. Dont let my description stop you from watching it. Adc characters are not in any way portrayed in a sexual nature, unless you count this.

The amazing digital circus might thank part of its popularity to the nostalgia of the kidcore aesthetic featured troughout the circus.

The adult lead character pomni appears as a clown with little features that we would objectively associate with an adult wonen besides possessing the clear psychological maturity and intelligence of an adult.

The features of pomni could be described as short stature, a bright childlike color scheme, and large eyes relative to the face, a physiological trait often associated with infancy in mammals.

Now for science, is it pedophia to wank off to amazing digital circus porn of pomni and does it make a difference wether its a visual drawing or a text based work of fiction.

My point is not to convince you of annythhing just that your argument itself easily falls apart once one has to define “childlike features” into a legal/moral setting.